The trial. A brutal highlighting of guilt ?

[Mr. Gee]

Try reading the list I posted yesterday on the 1992 report thread.

1) Two police officers were permitted to falsify evidence in favour of the prosecution.

2) The key evidence for the moderator had not been maintained,allowing the paperwork for two moderators to be merged,in order to bolster the prosecution.

3) One of the relatives had lied about the whereabouts of rifle and moderator,then police fabricated that evidence.

4) There was collusion between the police and the relatives in fabricating evidence.

5) Statements were edited without the presence of a witness,including a forensic scientist.

6) EP omitted to include logs from the scene which could have assisted the defence and given Jeremy an alibi.

7) Jury directly asked if the relatives had a motive,but were told that they were wealthy in their own right. Later discovered that it was untrue,as they had few assets and little land. Jeremy had been unaware at the time,but he would have inherited most of all their assets directly through his mother and father.

8 ) Chief constable Simpson chose not to act on both findings even though he'd been informed.

9) As a result the Police Complaints Authority also had colluded to deceive the public to maintain trust in the police and by using PII,made sure that many documents remained hidden from the defence and the public.

Just the TIP of the iceberg in complaints about this disgusting tin-pot investigation.

 

[lookout]

 That's better thanks Mr G.

[Adam]

Sources please. Unless these are made up.

How did the police and relatives work together to fabricate evidence ?

The only evidence the relatives had was the silencer. There has already been a thread showing it was impossible for the relatives to correctly fabricate evidence on a silencer. Are you saying the relatives asked the police to get the lab technicians to expertly contaminate the silencer.

All the three parties involved are taking a big risk here. The relatives on being charged and put in prison. Ditto the police & lab technicians, who had no financial motive.

[Adam]

This thread is about the brutality of the trial in exposing the attempted frame by and certain guilt of Jeremy.

Even 16 years later the COA said the 'jury were right'.

Do people believe the trial exposed this ?

[lookout]

 I'm aware of what the thread is about you cheeky young pup.

Just because something doesn't fit in with your answers !!

[Jan]

Sources please. Unless these are made up.

How did the police and relatives work together to fabricate evidence ?

The only evidence the relatives had was the silencer. There has already been a thread showing it was impossible for the relatives to correctly fabricate evidence on a silencer. Are you saying the relatives asked the police to get the lab technicians to expertly contaminate the silencer.

All the three parties involved are taking a big risk here. The relatives on being charged and put in prison. Ditto the police & lab technicians, who had no financial motive.

Adam it was not impossible for the family to fabricate the evidence at all. It may be unlikely - but definitely not impossible - I don't care what your thread says.

And I don't know how many times we have to repeat this - if we knew what the full story was with the silencer / silencers then we would not all be on this forum would we?

You tell me why the police took silencers from the family for the court hearing without telling them why and they came back with evidence stickers on ? ( source Rb COLP interview)

Why is there a document on here ( and no I am not going to post it again) where it says DB reported the silencer on 10/9/1985? 

Why when the family had been going on and on about it being JB from the second day , when they found out it was human blood on the outside ( blood grouping was not an accurate science in those days ) did the police change their minds straight away? this was very quickly after the silencer was handed in. Especially if when they went in there were two shots and a "staged body"?

[lookout]

 It's like talking to a sponge.

[Jan]

It's like talking to a sponge.

Not at all! a sponge absorbs things This is more like throwing a boomerang , at a rubber wall.

[Adam]

Adam it was not impossible for the family to fabricate the evidence at all. It may be unlikely - but definitely not impossible - I don't care what your thread says.

And I don't know how many times we have to repeat this - if we knew what the full story was with the silencer / silencers then we would not all be on this forum would we?

You tell me why the police took silencers from the family for the court hearing without telling them why and they came back with evidence stickers on ? ( source Rb COLP interview)

Why is there a document on here ( and no I am not going to post it again) where it says DB reported the silencer on 10/9/1985? 

Why when the family had been going on and on about it being JB from the second day , when they found out it was human blood on the outside ( blood grouping was not an accurate science in those days ) did the police change their minds straight away? this was very quickly after the silencer was handed in. Especially if when they went in there were two shots and a "staged body"?

I will find my thread on how it is impossible for the relatives to plant incriminating evidence on the silencer.

The simple facts with the silencer are -

There is no reason why the police would find the silencer in the first three days. It was in a box, underneath & behind other boxes, guns and dartboards at the back of the gun cupboard. It was murder/suicide. Thread already created.

The relatives looked for & found a silencer. BW & BC were also at WHF.

The silencer was handed into the police shortly afterwards.

The police took it to be tested.



The rest is all Chinese Whispers.

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5328.0.html

[lookout]

Not at all! a sponge absorbs things This is more like throwing a boomerang , at a rubber wall.

Of course.

[Alias]

Not at all! a sponge absorbs things This is more like throwing a boomerang , at a rubber wall.

Or banging your head against a brick wall!
Adam knows I have him on ignore, and usually on working days, I just cannot face the repetitions! During weekends - sometimes I have the energy to take it head on! 

Jan, are those your feet - in pink, polkadot rubber boots? Cute!

[Jane]

Or banging your head against a brick wall!
Adam knows I have him on ignore, and usually on working days, I just cannot face the repetitions! During weekends - sometimes I have the energy to take it head on! 

Jan, are those your feet - in pink, polkadot rubber boots? Cute!

Isn't it AMAZING how tolerable he becomes when one has him on ignore :D

[Alias]

Isn't it AMAZING how tolerable he becomes when one has him on ignore :D

A bliss, absolute bliss! 

[Jan]

Or banging your head against a brick wall!
Adam knows I have him on ignore, and usually on working days, I just cannot face the repetitions! During weekends - sometimes I have the energy to take it head on! 

Jan, are those your feet - in pink, polkadot rubber boots? Cute!

yes those are my real feet in spotty pink wellies.