Was Sheila Caffell set up by her brother Jeremy Bamber?

[Kaldin]

Why exactly?   They are the words which I choose to use and are edited and adapted in most cases to fit with the relevant thread being discussed on this forum.

Because you are using the words of someone else and presenting them as your own. It's not difficult to use the quote button here to make it clear that you are quoting someone else.

Like this.

It's also polite to include a link to the document you are quoting so others can read it for themselves.

Wrong again Kaldin.  I am merely repeating points of law and established fact which has been the subject of a criminal trial and thereafter confirmed to be beyond reproach as a means to answer questions.  I do not require to link to any document unless asked to do so by the original poster or if referred to specifically in my reply.

I will only link to a document if it is prudent to do so. Politeness has nothing to do with it.

I can only conclude that you are a plagiarist then. You're not even putting the words of others in speech marks. Perhaps others think they are your own words so they wouldn't ask for a link.

[smiffy]

Kaldin...


yourself and others may be interested to know that the poster "sandy" is also the poster known as "john"..real name john braes lamberton

he has a very bad record on several forums and is banned from many. He is well known for using multiple usernames and being very deceptive and disruptive.

[John]

So sorry smiffy/nugnug, did I expose your game-play.   

[Roch]

Kaldin...


yourself and others may be interested to know that the poster "sandy" is also the poster known as "john"..real name john braes lamberton

he has a very bad record on several forums and is banned from many. He is well known for using multiple usernames and being very deceptive and disruptive.

As in Sandy4?  So you're saying he is both John and Sandy?  And he's saying you are both Smiffy and nugnug? 

[Kaldin]

This forum seems to have gone to pot. 

[Alias]

Kaldin...


yourself and others may be interested to know that the poster "sandy" is also the poster known as "john"..real name john braes lamberton

he has a very bad record on several forums and is banned from many. He is well known for using multiple usernames and being very deceptive and disruptive.

As in Sandy4?  So you're saying he is both John and Sandy?  And he's saying you are both Smiffy and nugnug?

Maybe they´re all the same person with a hefty Sybil syndrome... 

[nugnug]

if you read bothe my posts and smiffys you may notice we dont agrea on a fair amount of things

are all these guess the poster games really helpfull.

[smiffy]

I am not nugnug or the real life person lamberton claims I am.

you may find stuff about John Lambertons multi user name activity...disruptive postings and lies on several forums.  "sandy" and "john" are one and the same...he may even use more names here..it would be par for the course...If I can identify any more I will let you know.

wrongly accused person forum;

   
http://forum.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/index.php


nugnugs "mycrimes" forum;    http://mycrimesforum.myfastforum.org/index.php


shirley mckie forum;      http://shirleymckie.myfastforum.org/forum1.php

READ ABOUT HIM THERE IN THE PAST


glasgow innocence; (I disagree with many there) but they know of him SO HERES THE LINK

http://glasgowinnocence.myfreeforum.org/forum1.php

if in doubt go check him out... a terrible reputation.
He has wrecked other forums in the past and created a forum himself that got closed down due to its malicious abusive content.

[Kaldin]

Perhaps all this could go in a new thread so that people can discuss the crime without all this disruption. 

[nugnug]

guilty or innocent i think jeremy bamber does deserve to be the center of attention on his own forum.

and he seems to be in serious danger of getting sidelined.

[sandy]

Why exactly?   They are the words which I choose to use and are edited and adapted in most cases to fit with the relevant thread being discussed on this forum.

Because you are using the words of someone else and presenting them as your own. It's not difficult to use the quote button here to make it clear that you are quoting someone else.

Like this.

It's also polite to include a link to the document you are quoting so others can read it for themselves.

Wrong again Kaldin.  I am merely repeating points of law and established fact which has been the subject of a criminal trial and thereafter confirmed to be beyond reproach as a means to answer questions.  I do not require to link to any document unless asked to do so by the original poster or if referred to specifically in my reply.

I will only link to a document if it is prudent to do so. Politeness has nothing to do with it.

I can only conclude that you are a plagiarist then. You're not even putting the words of others in speech marks. Perhaps others think they are your own words so they wouldn't ask for a link.

I really don't understand what you are on about Kaldin.  I can post edited text anywhere I desire, it is good practice to use the same words as were used at the trial and later. Consistency is the order of the day.

[Kaldin]

Why exactly?   They are the words which I choose to use and are edited and adapted in most cases to fit with the relevant thread being discussed on this forum.

Because you are using the words of someone else and presenting them as your own. It's not difficult to use the quote button here to make it clear that you are quoting someone else.

Like this.

It's also polite to include a link to the document you are quoting so others can read it for themselves.

Wrong again Kaldin.  I am merely repeating points of law and established fact which has been the subject of a criminal trial and thereafter confirmed to be beyond reproach as a means to answer questions.  I do not require to link to any document unless asked to do so by the original poster or if referred to specifically in my reply.

I will only link to a document if it is prudent to do so. Politeness has nothing to do with it.

I can only conclude that you are a plagiarist then. You're not even putting the words of others in speech marks. Perhaps others think they are your own words so they wouldn't ask for a link.

I really don't understand what you are on about Kaldin.  I can post edited text anywhere I desire, it is good practice to use the same words as were used at the trial and later. Consistency is the order of the day.

Fine, but please put the copied text in a quote box and post a link to wherever you got it from.

[sandy]

If it is copied text fine but if it is edited text then no as it is my version.

[Kaldin]

If it is copied text fine but if it is edited text then no as it is my version.

You're quoting from the appeal document but you're not making it clear that you're doing that, and you're not quoting the source. That's very bad form.

[sandy]

Do you ever quote from documents Kaldin and sometimes forget to link to them?