The Threat.

[tyler]

I did see the posts floating around and did not see that - I only saw her offer her log in details from here so her pms could be checked

So I would not like to comment on that , especially as that is a very serious allegation , and from an employers point of view could result in dismissal.

I did not see her offer her work log in details either? She offered her forum password to ngb so that he could check her messages.

[Caroline]

I did not see her offer her work log in details either? She offered her forum password to ngb so that he could check her messages.

Sorry Tyler, but she did give him her work details. I'm sure Jackie will confirm it.

[Patti]

I have a SEEN the PM in question, it was posted here by NGB - you obviously weren't here at the time. Jackie KNOWS she gave PH her login details - ask her.

No need to shout!lol  It does not say that at all. I have no idea where you got that from. All she says is that I will send you my work details....it never mentions a login.

I suppose it helps me to say the above because I have access to the post that NGB posted. 

[Caroline]

No need to shout!lol  It does not say that at all. I have no idea where you got that from. All she says is that I will send you my work details....it never mentions a login.

I suppose it helps me to say the above because I have access to the post that NGB posted. 

There were two messages posted, the second one actually contained her login details. NGB and Jackie can both confirm it - I'm not making it up Patti, it was posted here by NGB who took out the sensitive parts of the email (user name and password) before posting it.

[JackiePreece]

Sorry Tyler, but she did give him her work details. I'm sure Jackie will confirm it.

Caroline you have not replied to my message where I asked if PH got paid for the lies he put in the paper and if they have misquoted him has he made a complaint against the newspaper

[JackiePreece]

There were two messages posted, the second one actually contained her login details. NGB and Jackie can both confirm it - I'm not making it up Patti, it was posted here by NGB who took out the sensitive parts of the email (user name and password) before posting it.

Once again Caroline PH did not have access to ANY sensitive information Or I am sure he would have put it in the newspaper wouldn't he

[Caroline]

Caroline you have not replied to my message where I asked if PH got paid for the lies he put in the paper and if they have misquoted him has he made a complaint against the newspaper

Actually, I did reply to it - I said I haven't had any contact with PH over this and have no idea if he was paid or not. But now you are here - can you now confirm that you gave PH your WORK login details?

[Caroline]

Once again Caroline PH did not have access to ANY sensitive information Or I am sure he would have put it in the newspaper wouldn't he

I'm not saying he did and the article clearly states that. However, you did give him your work login details, correct?

[Mr. Gee]

It was posted by NGB when he looked into Jackie's claim about PH contacting her first.

Could I remind you that Jackie has been quite open about this and that her pm's are only on the open forum because she gave permission for him to do so. Indeed no one would be able to critisise her if it were not for her openess about all this. May I also add that on the other hand PH hasn't been so open about this in that he has not published the alleged threatening letter, but has chosen rather to freely throw accusations about willy nilly and without proper judgment and due consideration.

[Mr. Gee]

So PH was confused when he told my company I had sent him sensitive information which he couldn't provide?
Then he was further confused when he told the newspaper the same story

How much was he paid by the newspaper Caroline?
I take it you have asked him ?

Indeed Jackie I can see his obvious intentions here. People can say things in a certain way for it to sound as if the person offering them something legitimate is doing so in an underhanded way. As can be seen in his use of the words "sensitive information".

[Caroline]

Could I remind you that Jackie has been quite open about this and that her pm's are only on the open forum because she gave permission for him to do so. Indeed no one would be able to critisise her if it were not for her openess about all this. May I also add that on the other hand PH hasn't been so open about this in that he has not published the alleged threatening letter, but has chosen rather to freely throw accusations about willy nilly and without proper judgment and due consideration.

I am asking her to confirm that she gave PH her login details because people are suggesting that she didn't. A simple 'yes' would suffice. The reason it's important is that it has been suggested that PH lied about what was offered, it could also be that the offer was ambiguous and that he misunderstood.

[Mr. Gee]

It does not say that Caroline....I have looked. I would not lie to you. She gives NGB her login details not PH...

BTW Jackie never mentioned a data base PH did.

Yes I remember that. Perhaps what Caroline saw was Jackie offering ngb her pm login details? Personally I can't remember Jackie offering PH her login details? If I could I would say so.

[Mr. Gee]

I am asking her to confirm that she gave PH her login details because people are suggesting that she didn't. A simple 'yes' would suffice. The reason it's important is that it has been suggested that PH lied about what was offered, it could also be that the offer was ambiguous and that he misunderstood.

I agree a simple yes or no would suffice. But I have a hunch that you still would not believe her?

[Caroline]

Yes I remember that. Perhaps what Caroline saw was Jackie offering ngb her pm login details? Personally I can't remember Jackie offering PH her login details? If I could I would say so.

Jackie isn't denying it and there are others who know and saw the PM posted here. I'm not referring to her offering NGB her forum login details, I am referring to her offering PH her work login details.

[Patti]

Its not what the PM says but I wont be a parrot in keep repeating myself.  I have checked and checked and checked and there is no mention of Jackie saying that she will send him her log in details.  It would be rather a silly thing to do.

What she says is

"I will send you my work details, so you can see what I do"

As anyone can see it does not mention log in details nor does it mention anything about her giving him access to anything.  :D