The Threat.

[Roch]

Its a cheap way of not naming anyone dont you think?

Yes I think you are right there.  It is.

[guest7363]

I think it might be a good idea to withdraw from saying Guiltiers' and innocenters' it causes a divide. Us and them, or them and us., 

Maybe we should have a poll to find out how the members feel about it....

Patti you have enough on your plate moderating this forum without added pressure my dear. Your doing it splendid though

[guest154]

The day you joined the forum YOU sent me a threatening message
It was the same day Jeremy had his application to appeal turned down and you said on the open forum you already had prior knowledge of the decision

Ngb is most welcome to check that PM and can have my password anytime

I didn't join the forum that day, so you're wrong for starters.
I didn't send you a threatening PM, I very likely told you to piss off accusing me of being other people.

NGB is welcome to check your account, Jackie. I don't really care.

Yes, we would have acted if told of this.  It is never acceptable to make threats, whether direct or veiled, by PM.

It was very likely modded.  Didn't mean in any way to give the impression that the comment was allowed to stand, but just that it was posted. It wasn't PM it was said on the open board.

[Patti]

I didn't join the forum that day, so you're wrong for starters.
I didn't send you a threatening PM, I very likely told you to piss off accusing me of being other people.

NGB is welcome to check your account, Jackie. I don't really care.

It was very likely modded.  Didn't mean in any way to give the impression that the comment was allowed to stand, but just that it was posted. It wasn't PM it was said on the open board.

Sounds like you have had a bad day Mat....

[Alias]

Sounds like you have had a bad day Mat....

We all do from time to time. Laughed yesterday when you told us you had gone shopping with your top inside out! 
The worst I have done on a bad day was to bring two garbage bags on the subway! I was going to work and forgot to throw them in the bin outside at home! OHHHH, when I found out I had to get off and throw them away!!! 

[Mr. Gee]

I don't remember if I reported it. It was when I first joined the forum.  I'll PM you because  the person will jusrt deny it and it will lead to more problems.

Think people missed the main point behind my post though, wasn't that I was bothered by the comment, was saying that having had something like this said to me on the board I can understand why MD didn't go to the police, nothing the police could/would do.

If you knew who it was the police could do something if it was a direct threat to your life. When I went to the police about two abusers, one actually told me to expect a visit from him the police didn't do anything because they said he didn't actually saythat he was going to kill me. So probably if this person whoever he was said to you that you should watch your back if Bamber ever got out then the police wouldn't/couldn't do anything unless he actually threatened you that he was going to kill you, because Bamber is never likely to get out anyway? In any case I have never heard of him streaten anybody myself.

[Mr. Gee]

The day you joined the forum YOU sent me a threatening message
It was the same day Jeremy had his application to appeal turned down and you said on the open forum you already had prior knowledge of the decision

Ngb is most welcome to check that PM and can have my password anytime

I don't remember mat theatening you Jackie?

[Mr. Gee]

I think it might be a good idea to withdraw from saying Guiltiers' and innocenters' it causes a divide. Us and them, or them and us., 

Maybe we should have a poll to find out how the members feel about it....

The guilters always use the word "supporters" which is just as divisive as the word guilters. So how are we going to describe each other. The divide is there in the first place and will not go away just because we use euphamisms.

[Neil]

If you do not recall the "spat", how can you possibly make the above comment?  Where did I display anger towards Paul Harrison?  I was courteous at all times in my dealings with him.  In response he bombarded me with aggressive emails, making demands, at a time I was not even online.  I took the trouble to investigate the issue which led to his anger and I posted an accurate and unbiased report on what had happened.  He then made threats against me and the forum and he repeated them to others.  It was only after all this that I imposed a ban, not in anger but following calm reflection.  I explained this here at the time.

You appear to wish to defend Paul Harrison at all costs, now suggesting that I was just as much at fault as him over this.  It is almost tribal on here at times.

I was on line at the time.  It was expertly dealt with by NGB.  It was all very fair, well balanced and transparent.  It was quite obvious that NGB was making a great effort to be totally impartial.

 I remember being rather surprised that Mason Doyle reacted in the way he did, towards NGB.

[nugnug]

the big mystory to me is why he was bothred about what a few forum posters said about him online.

[Neil]

The guilters always use the word "supporters" which is just as divisive as the word guilters. So how are we going to describe each other. The divide is there in the first place and will not go away just because we use euphamisms.

I agree. 

[Neil]

the big mystory to me is why bothred about what a few forum posters said about him online.

Yes, I thought that too.

[JackiePreece]

I don't remember mat theatening you Jackie?

Grahame I will take a screenshot and send it to you

Maggie saw it immediately I got it

I forwarded it straight on

It was on the lines of watch your back

[Mr. Gee]

I agree.

Hi Neil, I think there are those members on here where these issues aren't just black and white? In my case for instance I believe there are other issues to be taken into consideration that would have had a bearing on the case. I am hoping (although not sure if I'll e alive next August?) that Harrison's book may iron out some of these issues concerning the police investigation?

[Mr. Gee]

Grahame I will take a screenshot and send it to you

Maggie saw it immediately I got it

I forwarded it straight on

It was on the lines of watch your back

I'm afraid I am not very good at remembering things like that. When people threaten me I usually take it with a pinch of salt and then dismiss it as being silly.