« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 78 79 [80] 81 82 ... 101   Go Down

Author Topic: The Threat.  (Read 103612 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1185 on: October 29, 2014, 06:28:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 29, 2014, 06:24:PM
Not blaming you are anyone for the article, certainly didn't say that.
What she says is
"I have available to me a huge database of over 100,000 email address and I could probably give you loads of free advertising and marketing." 
Now if you can't see that - then that is fine.

For the sake of forum harmony, best I not say. But the comment was "I'd watch my back with posts like that if Bamber is ever released."

LOL............I know I have seen it Mat. She is telling him that she has available to her a huge data base.  Where dose that sentence indicate that she is offering it to him?


Who said that to you Mat. Pm me.
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1186 on: October 29, 2014, 06:30:PM »
Quote from: Patti on October 29, 2014, 06:28:PM
LOL............I know I have seen it Mat. She is telling him that she has available to her a huge data base.  Where dose that sentence indicate that she is offering it to him?


Who said that to you Mat. Pm me.

Why else was she mentioning it? I have a colour printer at work, paper shredder, even a wireless keyboard and mouse. But I don't tell people about it when I email them.
She insinuated it Patti - it's very clear why.

Feel free to PM me and ask, Patti - but of course on the condition that it remains between us.
Logged

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1187 on: October 29, 2014, 06:31:PM »
Quote from: Patti on October 29, 2014, 06:23:PM
He was clever enough not to name her April, but the implication was strong enough to those who knew who he meant.




Then how did he know who was her employer, Patti? HE thought he knew who it was and so must the employer or he wouldn't have said she was hanging onto her job by a thread.
Logged

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1188 on: October 29, 2014, 06:32:PM »
Quote from: Mr. Gee on October 29, 2014, 06:19:PM
Who was it who told you to watch your back?

Grahame I imagine Mats threat is about as genuine as the PH one

Logged
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1189 on: October 29, 2014, 06:37:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 29, 2014, 06:24:PM
Not blaming you are anyone for the article, certainly didn't say that.
What she says is
"I have available to me a huge database of over 100,000 email address and I could probably give you loads of free advertising and marketing." 
Now if you can't see that - then that is fine.

For the sake of forum harmony, best I not say. But the comment was "I'd watch my back with posts like that if Bamber is ever released."

Which does not equal: She sent a letter (written on a typewriter.... :P :P :P - who does that these days... must be a very old person) with death threats against me. Yet PH contacts a newspaper strongly indicating that Jackie, Jeremy and to some degree, NGB are behind it. He does that without any proof whatsoever.

Is that person posting on the forum now? I would like to know who says such things, I don´t care about "forum harmony". It is non existent as it is!

Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1190 on: October 29, 2014, 06:39:PM »
Quote from: Alias on October 29, 2014, 06:37:PM
Which does not equal: She sent a letter (written on a typewriter.... :P :P :P - who does that these days... must be a very old person) with death threats against me. Yet PH contacts a newspaper strongly indicating that Jackie, Jeremy and to some degree, NGB are behind it. He does that without any proof whatsoever.



I didn't say that it did.  :-\
Logged

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1191 on: October 29, 2014, 06:41:PM »
Quote from: April on October 29, 2014, 06:31:PM



Then how did he know who was her employer, Patti? HE thought he knew who it was and so must the employer or he wouldn't have said she was hanging onto her job by a thread.

She told him April in the PM she sent him. That PM was posted on here by NGB and NGB had to go back to the post because it revealed where she worked. NGB amended it.  :-\
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1192 on: October 29, 2014, 06:42:PM »
Quote from: Patti on October 29, 2014, 06:41:PM
She told him April in the PM she sent him. That PM was posted on here by NGB and NGB had to go back to the post because it revealed where she worked. NGB amended it.  :-\

That was the PM she accused an admin of hacking her account and sending. It was only when the actual PM was posted it became clear there had been no hack. Because as you say, the PM contained her work details and information no admin could know.
Logged

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1193 on: October 29, 2014, 06:48:PM »
Quote from: Patti on October 29, 2014, 06:41:PM
She told him April in the PM she sent him. That PM was posted on here by NGB and NGB had to go back to the post because it revealed where she worked. NGB amended it.  :-\



Would that be the one which she said was in reply to his, in which he supposedly told her he wanted her to contact him?
Logged

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1194 on: October 29, 2014, 06:50:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 29, 2014, 06:42:PM
That was the PM she accused an admin of hacking her account and sending. It was only when the actual PM was posted it became clear there had been no hack. Because as you say, the PM contained her work details and information no admin could know.

Mat I am not going round the houses with you on this. I have said what I think and that is that. I am not going to be drawn into any argument of who said where and when.  What has happened has happened and there is nothing we can do about it.  Only PH has that ability.

I feel that this is getting stressful for all the members on this forum and its causing unnecessary rifts.
Logged

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1195 on: October 29, 2014, 06:58:PM »
Quote from: neil on October 29, 2014, 05:05:PM
Are you saying, that if Jackie had not had a pop at MD on the open forum, he would not have disclosed the content of their private exchanges, to the newspaper?

No! I'm saying her name couldn't have been drawn into ANYTHING because there would be nothing to draw her in.
Logged
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1196 on: October 29, 2014, 06:59:PM »
Quote from: April on October 29, 2014, 06:48:PM


Would that be the one which she said was in reply to his, in which he supposedly told her he wanted her to contact him?


No idea April, from what I gather it was her first to PH and he replied to her but then said he had no contact with her, but had told her to email him and murder archives.....I think his post was just as confusing.

Its like blinking question time on here lol
Logged

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1197 on: October 29, 2014, 07:03:PM »
Quote from: neil on October 29, 2014, 05:48:PM
I read it.  Caroline suggested that had this spat not occurred, Jackies name would not have been mentioned in the newspaper article.  I wonder how she can be so sure.

Err because that's not what I meant at all - that's your slant. People are good at doing that here!! I have repeated several time now that if Jackie hadn't tried to discredit MD, her name couldn't have been mentioned, he would have had no reason to mention her.
Logged
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1198 on: October 29, 2014, 07:11:PM »
Quote from: Patti on October 29, 2014, 06:59:PM

No idea April, from what I gather it was her first to PH and he replied to her but then said he had no contact with her, but had told her to email him and murder archives.....I think his post was just as confusing.

Its like blinking question time on here lol


But was he telling a specific person, OR was it as I believe, a round robin? He didn't give a personal email address. He made it clear that he received 100's of emails. He said replies could be lengthy but don't give up. He said to keep up the good work and signed himself Paul H. This was an impersonal letter that could have been sent to ANY one of the senders of the 100's on emails he receives.
Logged

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #1199 on: October 29, 2014, 07:12:PM »
Quote from: Caroline on October 29, 2014, 07:03:PM
Err because that's not what I meant at all - that's your slant. People are good at doing that here!! I have repeated several time now that if Jackie hadn't tried to discredit MD, her name couldn't have been mentioned, he would have had no reason to mention her.

It's black and white and cannot be disputed PH lied to a newspaper
Logged
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill
Pages: 1 ... 78 79 [80] 81 82 ... 101   Go Up
« previous next »