The Threat.

[nugnug]

to test this as proof you would have to have a retrial.

[Jan]

if affter somone was convicted you found further proof they were guilty surely the best thing to do wouuld be to confront them with it in hope they would finnaly give up.

or as I said before - hand it over to the authorities make it public ASAP to save any more appeal attempts and save the tax payers money.

[JackiePreece]

It is clear to see PH reaction when things don't go his way.
Disgraceful is an underestimate and most of what has gone on has not even been posted on the open forum.
It is likely he pestered the Campaign Team for information and they got fed up with the demands.
I would expect anyone writing about a suspected MOJ would be an honest person as someone's life is the subject of the publication.
This book if ever published is unlikely to give an honest opinion on the case

[Mr. Gee]

well he might of forgot i suppose.

If that is so nugnug then why condemn Jackie if she forgot ?

[Roch]

This book if ever published is unlikely to give an honest opinion on the case

Even if it also dared to expose EP and the prosecution witnesses?  Not that I'm saying it will do that.  I have no info what the content will be in respect of these interested parties in the case.

[Patti]

Just to remind members. THIS was Jackie's PM to PH


Posts: 2629
View Profile  Email  Personal Message (Offline) (No subject) « Sent to: Mason Doyle on: August 01, 2014, 11:05:PM » « You have forwarded or responded to this message. » ReplyQuoteDelete Mason,

I need to be in contact with you because I want to start a big campaign when your new book comes out.

I work for a publisher in Loughton and we run 5 different magayzines

One called Government Business.

I have available to me a huge database of over 100,000 email address and I could probably give you loads of free advertising and marketing

I will send you my work details, so you can see what I do

Incidentally the owner of my company lives in Maldon

Jackie


---------------------

Which is what the article says.

I think we can safely say that there is a massive difference in which the article said that he was offered access.  I totally agree that Jackie said she had access.  Jackie has been falsely represented in that article no matter how you look at. 

Jackie's PM below:

"I have available to me a huge database of over 100,000 email address and I could probably give you loads of free advertising and marketing" 

as opposed to the article which reads below:

"She offered to give him access to a database of over 100,000 email addresses, including potentially sensitive contacts within the Home Office and other government departments."

[Mr. Gee]

I think we can safely say that there is a massive difference in which the article said that he was offered access.  I totally agree that Jackie said she had access.  Jackie has been falsely represented in that article no matter how you look at. 

Jackie's PM below:

"I have available to me a huge database of over 100,000 email address and I could probably give you loads of free advertising and marketing" 

as opposed to the article which reads below:

"She offered to give him access to a database of over 100,000 email addresses, including potentially sensitive contacts within the Home Office and other government departments."

How terrible and twisted. Still Harrison did apparently tell us never to believe everything we read in the newspapers.

[Mr. Gee]

Clearly defamation isn't it? If that were me I'd be having my solicitor on to that. Jackie could have lost her job over it!

I agree, but solicitors cost money tyler. If it were me I'd be hopping mad and certainly have a solicitor send him a letter warning him of possible legal action.
In fact I am hopping mad about it now. I'm sick and tired of all this mud slinging at Jackie.

[nugnug]

you might be able find one who would do it on spec.

[Mr. Gee]

you might be able find one who would do it on spec.

I spent half an hour with a solicitor once. She told me nothing I didn't know myself and it cost me £120.

[Patti]

If I was Jackie I would get someone who is good at drafting letters up and address it to the newspaper concerned. This has caused Jackie a great deal of unnecessary stress along with the added pressure regarding her position at work.  I would insist on a written apology.

There is no doubt that the PM from Jackie did not say that and that PM was posted here on the 19th September.

Then if I was Jackie I would leave it at that, because her job is more important to her than any argument on a forum. 
 

[Mr. Gee]

If I was Jackie I would get someone who is good at drafting letters up and address it to the newspaper concerned. This has caused Jackie a great deal of unnecessary stress along with the added pressure regarding her position at work.  I would insist on a written apology.

There is no doubt that the PM from Jackie did not say that and that PM was posted here on the 19th September.

Then if I was Jackie I would leave it at that, because her job is more important to her than any argument on a forum. 

I agree Patti. That is what I would do myself. How could anyone do that after offering them publicity for their book? Betrayal is a word that is quite inadequate to describe what Harrison did to Jackie. Personally I think I will boycot his book.

[Patti]

I agree Patti. That is what I would do myself. How could anyone do that after offering them publicity for their book? Betrayal is a word that is quite inadequate to describe what Harrison did to Jackie. Personally I think I will boycot his book.

Hi Mr Gee

We have to consider whether it was the reporter who got the wrong end of the stick or he was told a lie. 

I would go to the source and that is the reporter, for he is the one that penned the article in the first place. 

I'm going to buy his book... lol

[Jan]

IMO - I still don't think it is right to publish accusations about  Jackie or NGB , but if they wanted at least they would have some re-course

To accuse Jeremy outright , when he has no right to reply I don't think is right. I find the whole thing bizzare tbh.

[Patti]

IMO - I still don't think it is right to publish accusations about  Jackie or NGB , but if they wanted at least they would have some re-course

To accuse Jeremy outright , when he has no right to reply I don't think is right. I find the whole thing bizzare tbh.

Yes Jan I agree, Jeremy has neither the means or the power and I hope that those that read the article can see it for what it is....