The Threat.

[Jane]

I honestly don't know how it works, as you said before you have to be careful esp with the Leverson inquiry, maybe this has made people think a bit more what they write?  Is mentioning Ngb and  Jackie liabel and not mentioning full names? Not sure.

Justice, I'm not certain that Jackie's name was ACTUALLY mentioned.

[nugnug]

I've just had a thought, I might be wrong. But there is a barring of news reports on Jeremy here in England, could that same barr be affecting his book? 

well thats news to me when did that happen.

[andrea]

Bambers wasn't in the news much anyway. So why a ban? Where did you read that, Patti?

[Patti]

From the official website: I said ban, but maybe I meant blanket...

"Jeremy Bamber has a legal team in place for his application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, all of whom are experienced with a proven track record in human rights cases and complex criminal appeals. They include a Solicitor, Barrister and QC all of whom give their time pro-bono. Jeremy does not require any further legal representation. There is currently a blanket ban on new information being released into the media, which is under review. Jeremy has a further two lawyers who work on his sentencing and prison law. Jeremy’s legal teams do not engage with media in any form. If you have legal or media enquiries"

[Patti]

It could mean new evidence I am not completely sure...

[ngb1066]

There are indications that there is some form of injunction in place preventing publication of allegations against certain people.  It is suggested that it is some form of anonymised superinjunction which means that even reporting the existence of the injuction is prohibited. I have no direct knowledge of this so I do not know if it is correct information, and if I did know I might be precluded from posting the information.  Certainly legal issues have prevented or at least delayed the publication of two books dealing with the case.

   

[nugnug]

i think it means the capaghn team cant release anything the media

[ngb1066]

i think it means the capaghn team cant release anything the media

I think it means that the campaign team have decided not to release information about the new submissions.  In the past they have publicised the basis for the submissions but that policy has changed.

 

[nugnug]

so theres no legal reason that anything cant be published then.

[ngb1066]

so theres no legal reason that anything cant be published then.

If there is an injunction it will prevent publication of certain things, but it could not be wide enough to prevent any discussion of the case.

[nugnug]

who could get an injunction i doubt if a court would be wiling to grant one to the campaghn team.

[ngb1066]

who could get an injunction i doubt if a court would be wiling to grant one to the campaghn team.

I agree and I do not think that the campaign team are suggesting that they have obtained an injunction.  An injunction could have been obtained by a police officers or officers involved in the case, by one or more of the relatives or by Julie Mugford.  My guess is that it is police officers.

[Mr. Gee]

August 20th.  Here is the message:


Re: (No subject)
« Sent to: JackiePreece on: August 20, 2014, 05:03:PM »
« You have forwarded or responded to this message. »ReplyQuoteDelete
Hi Jackie

I'm keeping a low profile at present, I have sustained a lot of pressure off the establishment and the cops, they have done their utmost to get the book banned and they don't know what is in it! They even tried to kill me off on the internet, hoping someone would come forward claiming to know details of the book. No one else, other than publisher and solicitor  does. If we make it into print, it won't be out until next year now. Still a few battles to fight yet I would think.

You can contact me at [email protected] its the email address most people come through and gets checked most frequently. I receive about 100 emails a day, all need a response, so please bear with me if you don't get an immediate response. Keep fighting and don't let them drown you out.

Paul H

Well! If he had that information from the authorities and the cops and they tried to get him killed off on the internet, then why does he blame Bamber and his "disciples" for sending the death threat letter? Surely the obvious people to look to are those who tried to get the book banned?

[Jane]

I agree and I do not think that the campaign team are suggesting that they have obtained an injunction.  An injunction could have been obtained by a police officers or officers involved in the case, by one or more of the relatives or by Julie Mugford.  My guess is that it is police officers.

Neil, after 30 years, I imagine that many who were in a position of command will have moved on in one way or another!!!!. I believe it's customary for police to retire at 55 so even those who were new recruits at the time must be getting to their "sell by" date.

[Mr. Gee]

This bit I find intriguing,

They even tried to kill me off on the internet

Which appears to imply that someone put out rumours that he was dead? If that is so then Jackie is certainly in the clear of putting out that rumour since she is the one he sent the email to.
As ngb has said, it looks as if a super injunction has been put in place to stop him mentioning certain people? I hate these injunctions and super injunctions because it seems as if they are a luxury only to be enjoyed by the rich or the influencial. It might also prevent vital information being published that the general public ought to know?