The Threat.

[nugnug]

You try to make it sound like a strange series of events, but since that's not how it actually happened... 

thats eactly how it happend his book got delayed and in the mean time he found evedence that made him change his stance well at least im asuming he found evedence.

so if hes find overwheling evedence of jeremys guilt during the delay hes very lucky the book was delayed.

[Patti]

well its a bit funny he says hes found new evedence that the case is a possble moj.

hes about but somthing or someone helds up the publication of the book.

during the delay he suddenly finds abslute proof of guilt now dont you think thats a rather seres of events.

Yes in 2013 his book was due to be published in the autumn, then it got delayed and he told us that is was due out in the spring and now its not going to published until August 2015....So if there is anything legal holding this book up, how can he keep saying when it is to be published. It does not make any sense to me.....

[guest154]

MD told us not to believe everything that you read on the internet, when there was an article printed about the book and an apparent few comments from him.

MD didn't speak about the contents of the book even on here often, he kept his cards close to his chest. The delay in publishing could be for a million reasons. I don't see how Nuggsy can say when the new evidence was found, just an attempt to make MD sound dodgy.

Nuggy's own posts is confusing.

well its a bit funny he says hes found new evedence that the case is a possble moj.
during the delay he suddenly finds abslute proof of guilt


 

[nugnug]

well thats the thing if hes changed his stance to guilt i cant see how there can be who would want to.

[nugnug]

Yes in 2013 his book was due to be published in the autumn, then it got delayed and he told us that is was due out in the spring and now its not going to published until August 2015....So if there is anything legal holding this book up, how can he keep saying when it is to be published. It does not make any sense to me.....

that's a long time to wait when you write for a living.

[guest154]

Yes in 2013 his book was due to be published in the autumn, then it got delayed and he told us that is was due out in the spring and now its not going to published until August 2015....So if there is anything legal holding this book up, how can he keep saying when it is to be published. It does not make any sense to me.....

Books are delayed all the time. It could be the publishers want to wait for a better time to market it? 30th anniversary coming up. It could be a legal issue that is holding it up. Which is what I've heard/posted about.

[nugnug]

what legal reason would there be to hold up a book that's agreeing with the verdict of a court of law.

[Jan]

There could be a few reasons - he must have lawyers looking over the book to see if there is anything libellous that cannot be proved by evidence. Perhaps that took longer than he thought.

Or perhaps someone sent him some evidence after he had finished the first draft?

I thought at one stage he thought JB was going to make another application and he was waiting for that , but now it looks like the 30 year anniversary is the target.

[guest7363]

thats eactly how it happend his book got delayed and in the mean time he found evedence that made him change his stance well at least im asuming he found evedence.

so if hes find overwheling evedence of jeremys guilt during the delay hes very lucky the book was delayed.

Mr Harrison said he began researching the case suspecting there may have been a miscarriage of justice but has since come to the conclusion that the police got the right man. Its just like another well known writer did, like a lot of people on this forum did, researched the case and realised that Bamber was guilty.

[Jan]

what legal reason would there be to hold up a book that's agreeing with the verdict of a court of law.

well  my post where he was very critical of EP might give a clue.

[Alias]

There could be a few reasons - he must have lawyers looking over the book to see if there is anything libellous that cannot be proved by evidence. Perhaps that took longer than he thought.

Or perhaps someone sent him some evidence after he had finished the first draft?

I thought at one stage he thought JB was going to make another application and he was waiting for that , but now it looks like the 30 year anniversary is the target.

Oh, my Gawd, your profile picture! LOLOLOLOLOL Old dear!

[Caroline]

Reading this thread back, it sound 'fanatical'.

[Jan]

Mr Harrison said he began researching the case suspecting there may have been a miscarriage of justice but has since come to the conclusion that the police got the right man. Its just like another well known writer did, like a lot of people on this forum did, researched the case and realised that Bamber was guilty.

I think he did say that the silencer evidence was dodgy though and that is a MOJ - But I agree if that was done just to get a guilty man then there is a moral and legal dilemma.

personally I would not want JB released on a technicality,

[Jan]

Oh, my Gawd, your profile picture! LOLOLOLOLOL Old dear!

Glad you get the joke ! Old dear with no sense of humour ehh?

[nugnug]

There could be a few reasons - he must have lawyers looking over the book to see if there is anything libellous that cannot be proved by evidence. Perhaps that took longer than he thought.

Or perhaps someone sent him some evidence after he had finished the first draft?

I thought at one stage he thought JB was going to make another application and he was waiting for that , but now it looks like the 30 year anniversary is the target.

the application wouldn't stop him writing or publishing anything god knows how much was published while the last one was going on.

thats a long time for them the lawyers to take fact checking.