The Threat.

[Mr. Gee]

So it has to be someone from the forums then - which is why the forums were mentioned.

Why do you say it "has to be someone from the forum"? Just because PH mentioned he forum? If you ask me Caroline that is an enormous leap of faith on your part to make that deduction when PH professes himself that an investigation as to who sent the alleged letter that it would go nowhere?

[Caroline]

Why do you say it "has to be someone from the forum"? Just because PH mentioned he forum? If you ask me Caroline that is an enormous leap of faith on your part to make that deduction when PH professes himself that an investigation as to who sent the alleged letter that it would go nowhere?

Because NGB was mentioned.

[lookout]

There you go then Lookout....It has to be someone who is aware of who is who. 

Of course it is,Patti. Someone after a quick buck. People aren't always what they seem.

[Patti]

I don't understand the question, if the letter mentions NGB, PH knows his real name.

I think you do understand the question Caroline.  It mentions NGB or his real....either way it mentions him. 

[Mr. Gee]

Because NGB was mentioned.

What you mean in the letter or in PH's article about the letter?

[Caroline]

It would be interesting to know if the person used the name NGB or his real name. If it was NGB then it is clearly someone from the forum, if it was his real name, then it is less clear (although still possible).

[ngb1066]

I didn't say it didn't mention your name but does it mention your REAL name or screen name? Have you seen the letter?

It refers to me by my real name.  My screen name is not mentioned, nor is this forum.  I have not seen the letter, although I would certainly like to see it.  As I said in my original post in this thread the reporter read me the parts which referred to me.   

[Caroline]

What you mean in the letter or in PH's article about the letter?

The letter

[Caroline]

It refers to me by my real name.  My screen name is not mentioned, nor is this forum.  I have not seen the letter, although I would certainly like to see it.  As I said in my original post in this thread the reporter read me the parts which referred to me.

OK, so it's someone who knows your real name - still doesn't really help given that many people here know your name.

[lookout]

OK, so it's someone who knows your real name - still doesn't really help given that many people here know your name.

I didn't up until a few months ago,and I've been here over 2 years. I don't take that much notice,nor do I ask questions. I only know Mikes' and Pattis' name.

[Mr. Gee]

OK, so it's someone who knows your real name - still doesn't really help given that many people here know your name.

You said in a previous post that if it refers to Neil as ngb then it is clear that it is some one from this forum. The you say if he uses his real name then it "still" doesn't really help given that many people on this forum know his real name.
Why I wonder do you appear to try to implicate this forum, seeing that the red forum use both names as well? Why can't it be that forum and not this one? Nothing is "clear" about this affair at all, so why keep jumping to conclusions?

[ngb1066]

OK, so it's someone who knows your real name - still doesn't really help given that many people here know your name.

The contents of the letter make it clear it was not written by a supporter of Jeremy Bamber.  It was quite clearly intended to harm him and at the same time to harm two other people.  Fortunately most people have seen through it.

 

[Caroline]

You said in a previous post that if it refers to Neil as ngb then it is clear that it is some one from this forum. The you say if he uses his real name then it "still" doesn't really help given that many people on this forum know his real name.
Why I wonder do you appear to try to implicate this forum, seeing that the red forum use both names as well? Why can't it be that forum and not this one? Nothing is "clear" about this affair at all, so why keep jumping to conclusions?

It can be someone from either forum(s) past or present. If it were someone involved in the campaign, I very much doubt they would have mentioned NGB, the very fact that he is mentioned (to me) means it has to be someone who uses the forums.

[Caroline]

The contents of the letter make it clear it was not written by a supporter of Jeremy Bamber.  It was quite clearly intended to harm him and at the same time to harm two other people.  Fortunately most people have seen through it.

 

But you have only been read extracts - I don't agree, I think it's a supporter but unless he takes things further which I strongly suggest he does, we will never know and they will most likely dream up another plot.

[ngb1066]

But you have only been read extracts - I don't agree, I think it's a supporter but unless he takes things further which I strongly suggest he does, we will never know and they will most likely dream up another plot.

I was read extracts and I have read the summary of the rest of the letter in the article.  The combination of factors, already fully canvassed here, together with some other details surrounding this, make it clear that the letter was not written by a Bamber supporter.  There is no plot, other that one to discredit Jeremy Bamber and two others.