Read the article again. Some things were nagging at me.
This mostly:
"The anonymous letter - written with a typewriter and posted in Essex last month - warns: "Jeremy is close to getting out now and he will not allow you to harm or deny him the opportunity to gain the freedom he deserves.
"He may still be inside but Mr super cop he's still a powerful man and ... he is influential with people outside who he will have destroy you and whatever claims you try to make in your book or anyone else that obstructs his path to freedom come to that.
"We will make sure he gets his way and do what it takes so back off, Jeremy's going to get you.""
First, a typewriter! Blimey, it sounds like something out of an old crime novel. Who uses a typewriter these days?!
Secondly, isn´t it a little presumptious to think that some obscure writer from Orkney Islands has so powerful information that he could keep Jeremy Bamber behind bars - where he is anyway, and most probably will stay for many years to come - if not until the day he dies.
How can this author of an unpublished book "deny him the opportunity to gain (....) freedom."?
"Obstruct his path to freedom..."
Thirdly,
"But Mr Harrison said his book will "finally bring closure" and prove Bamber's guilt beyond doubt when it is published ahead of the 30th anniversary of the slayings next August."
Errrr, there IS closure - it happened almost thrity years ago! Again, JB is behind bars - what is it that this author needs to prove?
Or is it just that he wants to sell books?
Runs and hides.

and more

and a
