Author Topic: The Threat.  (Read 103602 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #390 on: October 22, 2014, 07:39:PM »
that about sums it up. Like I said guilty or innocent Jeremy is not stupid - There is no way that he would risk everything by being connected with something like that.
As far as I know, he has never been involved in anything of this nature before; why would he start now at fifty three? Unlikely. Besides, he is not that stupid that he wouldn´t know it would harm him big time. Jeremy is out of the equation as far as I am concerned.
There have been other books about him with a negative stance - the authors have not received threats. There have been newspaper articles about him with a negative stance  - the journalists have not received threats.
This is BS.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #391 on: October 22, 2014, 07:40:PM »
How many will have read that and will be taken-in by it ?? Typical of the gutter press.
 

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #392 on: October 22, 2014, 07:44:PM »
Susan/Grahame can we draw a line under neath all of this please. Otherwise I will start to remove posts. 

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #393 on: October 22, 2014, 07:44:PM »
How many will have read that and will be taken-in by it ?? Typical of the gutter press.

Very true. Sensationalism, but I can see where the paper is coming from: business, they want to sell copies.
What I have a problem with is that "someone" fed this to the newspaper, in the process implicating Jeremy Bamber, Jackie and NGB.
Why, you have to ask yourself.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #394 on: October 22, 2014, 07:47:PM »
Very true. Sensationalism, but I can see where the paper is coming from: business, they want to sell copies.
What I have a problem with is that "someone" fed this to the newspaper, in the process implicating Jeremy Bamber, Jackie and NGB.
Why, you have to ask yourself.

Do you think its a ploy to cause as much disruption as possible to NGB, Jackie and this forum?
 


Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #395 on: October 22, 2014, 07:50:PM »
Mr Gee have not got a clue what that post means when I said I had not had abuse I got abuse from some not John and Tim when they thought I was Jackie Preece I got abuse on here from Mat and Vidvic would not speak to me and many others once it was cleared up I was not her everything was fine with me and has been ever since in fact Vic apologised to me and we became good friends so stop trying to cause trouble your Christian teachings are slipping.  I must admit I have Patti and Bridget to thank for making things good for me and I have not forgotten that.  Patti went on Red  and spoke to John and Tim about this post which I quote said "Susan Ingham is under investigation" now this was awkward for me the fact that **************** is my sister and it was not fair on her that is why after that I dropped the Ingham but all this was down to mistaken identity. I have never been abused by xxxx or xxxx and I will not say a word against them why would I.  You of course know me by my proper name as do others on Red and Blue.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2014, 09:59:AM by ngb1066 »

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #396 on: October 22, 2014, 07:52:PM »
Do you think its a ploy to cause as much disruption as possible to NGB, Jackie and this forum?

I do think it is someone holding a grudge against those three people. The two of them are connected to this forum, so maybe.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #397 on: October 22, 2014, 07:54:PM »
Mr Gee have not got a clue what that post means when I said I had not had abuse I got abuse from some not John and Tim when they thought I was Jackie Preece I got abuse on here from Mat and Vidvic would not speak to me and many others once it was cleared up I was not her everything was fine with me and has been ever since in fact Vic apologised to me and we became good friends so stop trying to cause trouble your Christian teachings are slipping.  I must admit I have Patti and Bridget to thank for making things good for me and I have not forgotten that.  Patti went on Red  and spoke to John and Tim about this post which I quote said "Susan Ingham is under investigation" now this was awkward for me the fact that ************ is my sister and it was not fair on her that is why after that I dropped the Ingham but all this was down to mistaken identity. I have never been abused by xxxx or xxxx and I will not say a word against them why would I.  You of course know me by my proper name as do others on Red and Blue.

Susan, are you sure it is wise to mention your sister´s name here? I wouldn´t!
« Last Edit: October 23, 2014, 10:00:AM by ngb1066 »

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #398 on: October 22, 2014, 07:56:PM »
Patti I apologise I am done now with Grahame for good so don't worry it is over with.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #399 on: October 22, 2014, 08:03:PM »
Alias when I joined the forum I had only been on the internet for three months and my friend said not to use my own name here in the Highlands as it is quite unusual.  My sister who has since died said to use her name as she does not do the internet but that is why I was so upset when the post was put up on Red but have to say John and Tim were brilliant and removed it very quickly and  I will always be grateful to them for that .  When I joined the forum in my sheer ignorance I was not aware my name would be posted up with each post otherwise I could have been Snowdrop or Rose anything but her name.  Once I changed my username to Susan all was well thank goodness.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #400 on: October 22, 2014, 08:04:PM »
Very true. Sensationalism, but I can see where the paper is coming from: business, they want to sell copies.
What I have a problem with is that "someone" fed this to the newspaper, in the process implicating Jeremy Bamber, Jackie and NGB.
Why, you have to ask yourself.





It's someone with an unnatural " hatred " for all three. I have a bad feeling about it.
Jeremy is hated for who he is,and not so much what the writer says he's done.
 Jackie because she's an easy target to mimic,as the ploy is to make everyone think it's her.
NGB,really and honestly I've no idea,apart from the fact that he's been in contact with Jeremy in the past,but it's no reason to involve him in any mud-slinging.

I'm going to say that the person who went to the trouble of causing this mayhem,is unhinged and has to be really hard up to tell such lies. 

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #401 on: October 22, 2014, 08:07:PM »
I was asked a question by Janus and Caroline said she was also curious...so, I answer the question and it's completely ignored.  Please, don't ask if you cannot have the courtesy to even acknowledge a reply.

Hi AA, sorry, I had to go out so have only just seen this. I wasn't ignoring you.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #402 on: October 22, 2014, 08:11:PM »
As far as I know, he has never been involved in anything of this nature before; why would he start now at fifty three? Unlikely. Besides, he is not that stupid that he wouldn´t know it would harm him big time.

When I first joined  ***** warned me of two things.
1). I believe he is guilty, so never ever write to him. Because you have to include your address and she had heard many times where addresses had been passed on to the campaign team and that this is where abuse started.
Same for when people are supporters and fall out with him.
2). She told me never to join the facebook pages.

Not saying that has to do with THIS letter, because although i do believe it was by a supporter I don't think Bamber had anything to do with it, but it's food for thought about who we give our personal details to in the future.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #403 on: October 22, 2014, 08:12:PM »
Alias when I joined the forum I had only been on the internet for three months and my friend said not to use my own name here in the Highlands as it is quite unusual.  My sister who has since died said to use her name as she does not do the internet but that is why I was so upset when the post was put up on Red but have to say John and Tim were brilliant and removed it very quickly and  I will always be grateful to them for that .  When I joined the forum in my sheer ignorance I was not aware my name would be posted up with each post otherwise I could have been Snowdrop or Rose anything but her name.  Once I changed my username to Susan all was well thank goodness.

I remember that well Susan. I was a moderator at the time and I went to great lengths to have that thread taken down a full days negotiations if I am correct. John as always obliged and while doing so took some more threads down. It was a difficult time as I remember just prior to the truce.

Please can we end all of this now..... :(

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: The Threat.
« Reply #404 on: October 22, 2014, 08:22:PM »
When I first joined  ****** warned me of two things.
1). I believe he is guilty, so never ever write to him. Because you have to include your address and she had heard many times where addresses had been passed on to the campaign team and that this is where abuse started.
Same for when people are supporters and fall out with him.
2). She told me never to join the facebook pages.

Not saying that has to do with THIS letter, because although i do believe it was by a supporter I don't think Bamber had anything to do with it, but it's food for thought about who we give our personal details to in the future.

Mat I am not sure you should be revealing this sort of information about *****. She supported Jeremy quite strongly If I remember rightly. It was not until her real name was revealed and her personal details of where she worked that she refrained from posting on here. Those details however were not revealed on this forum.

I cannot and will never understand how someone can gain confidence in a poster then at the same time reveal that posters details. It not cricket Mat is it?

I have been friends with you since day and yet I have never ever asked you a personal question. Yet on the other hand I have revealed all my hand to you.  I have nothing to hide you see, what you see is what you get....Yeah I am a grumpy bugger sometimes, we all are...I am only human with the normal feeling that go with it. 

So please forgive me if I strike through the name you have mentioned. 
« Last Edit: October 22, 2014, 08:23:PM by Patti »