The Threat.

[maggie]

Morning. 
Does seem strange. It seems like a way of letting Harrison wonder what else people know about him and how they've found out.


Not trying to alter your point. Although it's a very broad point. Only John called Bamber a non-entity, so not sure why you mentioned "so many who believe him guilty" to be wasting their times and have better ways to spend their lives - guess you just felt like throwing a stone at the guilters.

I'm not 'throwing stones' at anyone just widened the argument a bit but was responding to
A particular post. I'll ask you the same question, why do you spend so
much time debating about someone's guilt .... He's in prison for the rest of
his life what's the point?  Surely you have better things to do?

[lookout]

Morning Susan, the " split "/division was already there anyway,but I prefer not to call it that. The more adult way of looking at the case and what it entails,is, or should be,a " difference of opinion ".  Two entirely different forms of viewpoints. One,a childish " them and us ",the other being debate.
This is of course, my own take on the forum.

Although I have one or two books on the case,I prefer to follow my own thoughts and not those of authors who write of" history repeating itself",unless they were actually,physically there at the scene and were able to account for every detail which they wrote.

However,if by any chance I ever see any more snippets,I'll keep them under my hat.

[Adam]

A post from Red.

I crossed out the names as both are current posters on Blue.

Seems like Harrison's claim has a 'ring of truth' to it.

[susan]

Maggie I spend so much time debating Jeremy Bamber's guilt as I believe he is guilty.  I would like to see conclusive evidence  that would put to bed the idea he is in prison for a crime he did not commit and I think Paul Harrison can provide that evidence.  This is just my take on it and my explanation why I am on this forum it is not to argue with posters Maggie think how boring it would be if we were not here

[lookout]

How dare they ! Stalked ? Well I suppose they know their own tricks best !!

[guest154]

I'm not 'throwing stones' at anyone just widened the argument a bit but was responding to
A particular post. I'll ask you the same question, why do you spend so
much time debating about someone's guilt .... He's in prison for the rest of
his life what's the point?  Surely you have better things to do?

It's an interesting case, Maggie. I can't speak for the rest of the guilters but I personally find it interesting to see what the next attempt will be by Bamber to secure his release.  Guilters are no more guilty of wasting there time here than the supporters as nothing said here will make a difference to the case.

Your veiled insult of "Surely you have better things to do" would make sense if this is all I did, but the board is only something I access in my spare time - I'm sure the rest of the guilters have better things to do too  - as no one is on the board all the time.

But you obviously feel strongly enough about the case to spend a lot of your time here - so since you're questioning why me, and the guilters, are here - why are you here? What piece/pieces of evidence convince you to protest innocence for a convicted child killer? I guess there must be something you feel strongly about for you to do this.

[Jane]

A post from Red.

I crossed out the names as both are current posters on Blue.

Seems like Harrison's claim has a 'ring of truth' to it.

It seems that having two named people isn't enough. Could this be why you tried to implicate Jansus?

[Patti]

Not at all Susan------------no " split " in the forum.Why should there be.? That's purely autosuggestion.
In other words-----------unless you want there to be ?

Lookout you did nothing wrong. If you had not posted it someone else would have. 

[susan]

lookout wow how strange a post from you has now appeared from the Sunday Scottish Express it was not on when I spoke with you yesterday you said you got your information from latest news on Jeremy Bamber I can assure you that would not bring up this Paul Harrison story.  Now lookout I am neither blind nor stupid and wonder why you have found it necessary to include this post as an extra.  Remember I know exactly what is going on and I find it quite insulting to say the least.

[lookout]

Lookout you did nothing wrong. If you had not posted it someone else would have. 

Thanks Patti. 

[lookout]

Excuse me,Susan ??

[guest154]

I'm not 'throwing stones' at anyone just widened the argument a bit but was responding to
A particular post. I'll ask you the same question, why do you spend so
much time debating about someone's guilt .... He's in prison for the rest of
his life what's the point?  Surely you have better things to do?

Well I did reply to this, but it seems to have been deleted. 

[Patti]

Patti the only thing lookout did wrong was not to tell the truth about her source.  It is an insult to my intelligence the feeble source she gave me I know exactly what went on and I find it disappointing and very sad .

I will tell you now Susan that Lookout has not lied about where she got her source from it is freely available on the internet. Anyone could have found it by googling. I am not sure what you are trying to say.

Any further attacks on each other and the thread will be locked. By all means discuss the newspaper release and its contents.

[lookout]

Patti the only thing lookout did wrong was not to tell the truth about her source.  It is an insult to my intelligence the feeble source she gave me I know exactly what went on and I find it disappointing and very sad .

Susan there's just been a post of yours implicating me in the Scottish Express newspaper,and as I tried to highlight the quote to answer it----------------it VANISHED ??
That's why I've just asked the question " Excuse me "".What's going on ?

It began with " Wow " ?

[lookout]

 Someone's using your ID,Susan.