The Threat.

[Mr. Gee]

lookout did you get a tip off or do you usually read the Scottish Sunday Express

Ngb showed me the article, but I didn't post it on the forum because I foresaw all this which is going on now.

[Mr. Gee]

i wonder what they ment by you have allready dodged one bullet.

I think the only person who could answer that one nugnug is Paul Harrison?

[Jan]

Is it not libel or slander  by printing the article in a paper without having proof that Jeremy is behind it?

Because if it is actually a Jeremy hater stirring things up then surely he has played right into their hands ?

Of is it not possible to be libelled or slandered when you are already in prison?

Neil - do you think your name would have been mentioned if you had not been invited to comment?

[nugnug]

what beats me is that somone could take objection to a book before they have even had a chance to read it.

and that makes me think there objection isnt genuine.

[Jan]

what beats me is that somone could take objection to a book before they have even had a chance to read it.

and that makes me think there objection isnt genuine.

That's true , and he may think he has found the true answer - but he may not have - or it could purely be his gut feeling - not proof  but as you say no one will know until the book comes out.

[ngb1066]

Is it not libel or slander  by printing the article in a paper without having proof that Jeremy is behind it?

Because if it is actually a Jeremy hater stirring things up then surely he has played right into their hands ?

Of is it not possible to be libelled or slandered when you are already in prison?

Neil - do you think your name would have been mentioned if you had not been invited to comment?

It is technically libellous of Jeremy, but the problem he faces is that as someone convicted of mass murder he is deemed not to have a character to defame.  He would therefore not get anywhere.

I think the journalist was obliged to invite me to comment if he intended to use my name in the article.  He clearly intended to use my name as it featured prominently in the letter and I can understand that he needed to find out what my views were.  To say I was shocked is an understatement.

 

[Jane]

what beats me is that somone could take objection to a book before they have even had a chance to read it.

and that makes me think there objection isnt genuine.

Well, Nugs, it COULD be someone who can't read and feels embarrassed by it OR it COULD be someone who took exception to what they THOUGHT the book might have to say.

[Jan]

It is technically libellous of Jeremy, but the problem he faces is that as someone convicted of mass murder he is deemed not to have a character to defame.  He would therefore not get anywhere.

I think the journalist was obliged to invite me to comment if he intended to use my name in the article.  He clearly intended to use my name as it featured prominently in the letter and I can understand that he needed to find out what my views were.  To say I was shocked is an understatement.

 

I can see why . I think it is disgusting  that you have been dragged into and associated with what is a criminal act.

[nugnug]

this was clearly the intention of the writter.

[ngb1066]

this was clearly the intention of the writter.

Yes, I agree it was.

[Jane]

I can see why . I think it is disgusting  that you have been dragged into and associated with what is a criminal act.

But at least Neil can defend him self, which is more than Jeremy can do. Despite I think he's guilty, not for a moment do I believe he's involved in this. As a Cat A prisoner, all his outgoing and incoming mail will be checked. If he was discovered to have been embroiled in anything CLOSE to this EVIL act, I feel certain that any credits he'd earned for himself would be removed.

[Caroline]

But at least Neil can defend him self, which is more than Jeremy can do. Despite I think he's guilty, not for a moment do I believe he's involved in this. As a Cat A prisoner, all his outgoing and incoming mail will be checked. If he was discovered to have been embroiled in anything CLOSE to this EVIL act, I feel certain that any credits he'd earned for himself would be removed.

I have to agree, I don't think he would be involved in this, it's obviously extremely damaging to him.

[lookout]

Ngb showed me the article, but I didn't post it on the forum because I foresaw all this which is going on now.

You should have told me,Mr G,then I wouldn't have let on. I could have just sat with steam coming out of my ears instead.  I had no idea it would have had the reaction it did. I'll keep mum in future.

[JackiePreece]

Once and for all I must make it clear I did not write the letter and it's not something I would ever consider doing.
I am disgusted by the letter and it should be properly investigated by the police. I do not believe this is a letter written by a Bamber supporter, it was written by someone wanting to harm Jeremy and trying to implicate me at the same time.
I want to find out wrote the letter because whoever did this should be prosecuted.

[ngb1066]

You should have told me,Mr G,then I wouldn't have let on. I could have just sat with steam coming out of my ears instead.  I had no idea it would have had the reaction it did. I'll keep mum in future.

Do not worry Lookout.  It was bound to be posted at some stage.