The found hacksaw:

[susan]

Adam  I don't think him or an accomplice used a silencer it would all be over too quickly this also applies to Sheila if she had murdered her family she would not have used a silencer that evidence would not stand up in Court today it was contaminated handled by all and sundry Taff Jones used it as a paper weight.

[Caroline]

Thank you. But I was asking Susan as she said she did not believe a word about it.

You didn't specify but as it's a discussion board, you also don't get to control who answers.

[Adam]

Adam  I don't think him or an accomplice used a silencer it would all be over too quickly this also applies to Sheila if she had murdered her family she would not have used a silencer that evidence would not stand up in Court today it was contaminated handled by all and sundry Taff Jones used it as a paper weight.

I have no idea whether the silencer would be submitted as evidence at trial now.

Evidence for criminal trials can be found  weeks or months after a crime and presented at trial. Evidence can be found by anyone.

There is no deadline and no one knows when new evidence will be found.

[Adam]

I assume Jeremy has tried to get the silencer evidence thrown out at appeals.

He has tried everything else with it.

[susan]

Adam I agree but this silencer was passed from pillar to post the relatives had taken it home and IMO cannot be treated with any credence whatsoever

[Adam]

Adam I agree but this silencer was passed from pillar to post the relatives had taken it home and IMO cannot be treated with any credence whatsoever

Well they took the silencer and lots of other things home. Then handed it to the police.

[susan]

Adam they did not hand it to the police straight away they should not have removed it from the property but informed the police of their find and let them deal with it. It is not correct for relatives to be removing evidence from the scene of the crime.

[Adam]

Adam they did not hand it to the police straight away they should not have removed it from the property but informed the police of their find and let them deal with it. It is not correct for relatives to be removing evidence from the scene of the crime.

Oh well. They took it home. Nothing sinister in that.

[susan]

Adam big mistake on the part of the relatives you just can't remove evidence from a crime scene as how can it be proved that is where it came from in the first place.

[Adam]

Adam big mistake on the part of the relatives you just can't remove evidence from a crime scene as how can it be proved that is where it came from in the first place.

Well Basil Cock and BW were also at WHF. Together with the relatives. The silencer fitted the rifle. There had to one at WHF.

[Mr. Gee]

Well Basil Cock and BW were also at WHF. Together with the relatives. The silencer fitted the rifle. There had to one at WHF.

Neither of them saw the silencer in question, or the finding of it.

[lookout]

 That wouldn't be permitted in court today.
 1) Contamination.
 2) The police didn't find it.

[Caroline]

That wouldn't be permitted in court today.
 1) Contamination.
 2) The police didn't find it.

Not all the evidence has to be found by police but what is suspicious is that only the day previous they had mentioned the silencer, Jeremy had been question about a silencer  - then low and behold ..... they find the silencer. It's a bit like the 'Holy Grail' (the Monty Python version!).

[Adam]

Not all the evidence has to be found by police but what is suspicious is that only the day previous they had mentioned the silencer, Jeremy had been question about a silencer  - then low and behold ..... they find the silencer. It's a bit like the 'Holy Grail' (the Monty Python version!).

Who did the relatives mention the silencer to the day before ? Have you got a source please ?

Finding the silencer for a WHF rifle inside WHF is no mystery.

[Caroline]

Who did the relatives mention the silencer to the day before ? Have you got a source please ?

Finding the silencer for a WHF rifle inside WHF is no mystery.

Common knowledge for those who can be bothered to read AE's statements.