Author Topic: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy  (Read 14979 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #90 on: September 25, 2014, 08:08:PM »
So now we have 3 unpublished books and Jeremy is" solicitorless". Mmmmm.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #91 on: September 25, 2014, 08:12:PM »
well hes not solicitousness hes sacked his solicter so i asume hes got a new one i mind.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #92 on: September 25, 2014, 08:17:PM »
Not so easy to come by for nothing,nugs.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #93 on: September 25, 2014, 08:21:PM »
But it isn't readily apparent that he's guilty. If a known schizophrenic murderer who killed his partner and their little boy in a frenzied knife attack can get away with  being allowed to appeal for the estate which was left after her death,then why can't someone hear Jeremy out once and for all.?
After all,the Bamber murders was supposed to have been the worst crime of the century and it must have been expected to have received a unanimous verdict,so why wasn't it ?

What DOES happen when and if a person IS telling the truth and ends up in this situation ?

The evidence is ploud and clear.  There is considerable evidence that Sheila can't have killed herself, can't have killed anyone else, that Nevill can't have called Jeremy and that Jeremy lied about leaving the gun and bullets out before leaving the house.  Evidence proves he staged the bullets after he murdered eveyrone.

You just don't want ot face the eivdence so you simply say it doesn't exist.  You can't refute it you just lie and say there is none.  That just makes you living in a sad state of denail it doesn't sugges tJeremy is innocent.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #94 on: September 25, 2014, 08:27:PM »
well hes not solicitousness hes sacked his solicter so i asume hes got a new one i mind.



I don't imagine there's a queue of solicitors' firms knocking on his door to take over.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #95 on: September 25, 2014, 08:30:PM »
The evidence is ploud and clear.  There is considerable evidence that Sheila can't have killed herself, can't have killed anyone else, that Nevill can't have called Jeremy and that Jeremy lied about leaving the gun and bullets out before leaving the house.  Evidence proves he staged the bullets after he murdered eveyrone.

You just don't want ot face the eivdence so you simply say it doesn't exist.  You can't refute it you just lie and say there is none.  That just makes you living in a sad state of denail it doesn't sugges tJeremy is innocent.





So where is ALL this evidence that puts Jeremy in the picture then ?

Either June or Neville shot Sheila.

I'm far from being a saddo or an idiot ! I'm telling you that the murders were carried out by the three adults inside the farmhouse after Jeremy had left.!!

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #96 on: September 25, 2014, 08:32:PM »
nugnug maybe the Campaign Team think they can manage I read ages and ages ago on a site I was on Jeremy Bamber Is Innocent that a guy on the CT said he was in the middle of preparing the submissions :'(

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #97 on: September 25, 2014, 08:55:PM »


I don't imagine there's a queue of solicitors' firms knocking on his door to take over.

he might have one allready that might be why he sacked simon mckay.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #98 on: September 25, 2014, 09:10:PM »
So where is ALL this evidence that puts Jeremy in the picture then ?

Either June or Neville shot Sheila.

I'm far from being a saddo or an idiot ! I'm telling you that the murders were carried out by the three adults inside the farmhouse after Jeremy had left.!!

The evidence has already been posted numerous times, you keep saying it is too long to read or that you simply refuse to believe it.  That just means you are living in denial and you just proved it lound and clear with you claim that June or Nevill killed Sheila.

Even if one of the parents killed Sheila why would they kill their spouse and they surely would have to have committed suicide then.  Neivll coudl nto have shot himself in the head 4 times to commit suicide.  June can't have shot herself multiple times to comit suicide.

They especially can't have shot and killed themselves with a rifle that was no where near their bodies and then after dying have place it near Sheila.   

What you are demonstrating is that you refuse to face Jeremy committed the murders and will accept anyone except him committed the murders no matter how silly and contrary to the evidence such claim is.

You are not operating on the basis of facts and evidence simply bias.  You choose to live in denial.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33783
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #99 on: September 25, 2014, 09:13:PM »
The evidence has already been posted numerous times, you keep saying it is too long to read or that you simply refuse to believe it.  That just means you are living in denial and you just proved it lound and clear with you claim that June or Nevill killed Sheila.

Even if one of the parents killed Sheila why would they kill their spouse and they surely would have to have committed suicide then.  Neivll coudl nto have shot himself in the head 4 times to commit suicide.  June can't have shot herself multiple times to comit suicide.

They especially can't have shot and killed themselves with a rifle that was no where near their bodies and then after dying have place it near Sheila.   

What you are demonstrating is that you refuse to face Jeremy committed the murders and will accept anyone except him committed the murders no matter how silly and contrary to the evidence such claim is.

You are not operating on the basis of facts and evidence simply bias.  You choose to live in denial.




Have you forgotten about the children?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #100 on: September 25, 2014, 09:14:PM »
nugnug maybe the Campaign Team think they can manage I read ages and ages ago on a site I was on Jeremy Bamber Is Innocent that a guy on the CT said he was in the middle of preparing the submissions :'(

well actually need a solicter to make submissions though its best if it is done by solicter.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #101 on: September 25, 2014, 09:17:PM »
Have you forgotten about the children?

No I assume she was asserting Sheila killed the kids before the parents killed her.  Of course she attacks June enough that she could have suggested June killed them too.  I think it is sufficient to point out the problems with either parent committing suicide without needing to complicate matters with who killed the boys.


Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #102 on: September 25, 2014, 09:22:PM »
nugnug you are right it is better if a Solicitor makes the submissions but the Campaign Team were preparing them I read that from the guy doing them maybe this is why the split occurred.

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #103 on: September 25, 2014, 09:31:PM »
Ngb is Gareth Peirce still practising?
You could telephone Birnberg Peirce & Partners and ask about her! Their number is 020 7911 0166.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Simon McKay No Longer Representing Jeremy
« Reply #104 on: September 25, 2014, 09:33:PM »
personally i thought mckay on to much work for one man to handell anyway.