Author Topic: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?  (Read 3716 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #30 on: September 24, 2014, 11:36:AM »
Obviously June had her reasons for not wanting to leave Sheila alone with the twins whilst at the farm. We can only speculate as to why. Jeremy has said that she was prone to physically abusing them. June told Pam that Sheila wasnt showing any interest in them and obviously children have needs. June wouldnt have been available to be on hand for them 24/7. In London,Sheila only had the twins at weekends. June would have no control over that situation. Perhaps this was another reason she would have liked for her to relocate to Essex. Something that Jeremy says Sheila did not want to do,and I believe that.

Jeremy said Sheila did not want to relocate. Source please.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #31 on: September 24, 2014, 11:38:AM »
Thank you.

I have thanks. But have never read any of the numerous claims you made in you're posts in this thread.

The other people who never provided sources - Lookout and Grahame. They didn't have them.
Which part of my post are you disputing? I will direct you to the relevant statements.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #32 on: September 24, 2014, 11:38:AM »
I believe the conversation took place,its just that no-one can know WHEN it took place. I think the problem is,is that some are confusing 'foster carer' with 'child minder'. The twins had previously been cared for by 'day fosterers'. What are 'day fosterers' if not child minders?  June had used them for her own children when they were young and there is a statement somewhere where it is stated that June had been enquiring around the village that week for childminders. Also,Jean B has since admitted that childcare had been being discussed that week. Colin did not have formal custody of the children. Maybe June and Nevill were thinking long term, that if they could relocate Sheila back to Essex,then childcare would be needed for the children at weekends when the twins visited Sheila,and I would imagine they were aiming for Sheila to get better and have the twins returned to her full time. Children need their mothers,and Colin neeed to work. Once Sheila became ill,it has been said that June would not leave Sheila alone with the twins.And between running various farms,a caravan park,church and charity work,caring for sick relatives etc,it just would not have been possible for June,at 61 years to care for two lively six year olds. Attempting to make plans for Sheila and the boys which would have no doubt brought about changes for everyone could have unnerved either Sheila or Jeremy or both,which may have had a bearing on the murders. So I dont really see how conversations about foster caring/childminding could be proof for either Jeremy or Sheila's guilt/innocence. Imo.

June had been enquiring at the week of the massacre about child minders. Source please.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #33 on: September 24, 2014, 11:39:AM »
I believe the conversation took place,its just that no-one can know WHEN it took place. I think the problem is,is that some are confusing 'foster carer' with 'child minder'. The twins had previously been cared for by 'day fosterers'. What are 'day fosterers' if not child minders?  June had used them for her own children when they were young and there is a statement somewhere where it is stated that June had been enquiring around the village that week for childminders. Also,Jean B has since admitted that childcare had been being discussed that week. Colin did not have formal custody of the children. Maybe June and Nevill were thinking long term, that if they could relocate Sheila back to Essex,then childcare would be needed for the children at weekends when the twins visited Sheila,and I would imagine they were aiming for Sheila to get better and have the twins returned to her full time. Children need their mothers,and Colin neeed to work. Once Sheila became ill,it has been said that June would not leave Sheila alone with the twins.And between running various farms,a caravan park,church and charity work,caring for sick relatives etc,it just would not have been possible for June,at 61 years to care for two lively six year olds. Attempting to make plans for Sheila and the boys which would have no doubt brought about changes for everyone could have unnerved either Sheila or Jeremy or both,which may have had a bearing on the murders. So I dont really see how conversations about foster caring/childminding could be proof for either Jeremy or Sheila's guilt/innocence. Imo.

It has been said June would not leave Sheila alone with the twins. Source please.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #34 on: September 24, 2014, 11:40:AM »
Which part of my post are you disputing? I will direct you to the relevant statements.

Page 2 has other source requests. Thank you.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2014, 11:45:AM »
Jeremy said Sheila did not want to relocate. Source please.
Sheet 3 of Jeremy's 7th August statement in the statement thread.Sorry,dont know how to link it.

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2014, 11:52:AM »
Sheet 3 of Jeremy's 7th August statement in the statement thread.Sorry,dont know how to link it.


Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #37 on: September 24, 2014, 12:24:PM »
Is it possible that he wanted attention from her?



Tyler, the particular behaviours that I indicated suggest that he did? Might he have believed his needs were sacrificed to Sheila's?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #38 on: September 24, 2014, 12:29:PM »
Jeremy said Sheila did not want to relocate. Source please.





Get Claire Powells' book and you'll get ALL the sources you need ! A few shocks too.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #39 on: September 24, 2014, 01:49:PM »
Well said Tyler :)

There is of course a statement from Colin's mother in the archives relating to child care.  I will go look for it,.  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Well remembrred Patti, I knew I hsd seen something like that.
Excellent post tyler, all you say about the child care discussion makes perfect sense and is backed up by CC's mother's statement. Some see June and Nevill as interfering, control freaks but it's very possible they were just trying to sort out the best possible solution to safeguard the twins and help out all involved.
We have no idea what Sheila thought of their proposals or whether she was even listening as according to Jeremy she didn't appear to be involved in the conversation at all.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #40 on: September 24, 2014, 01:55:PM »
Sheilas' mood at the time was the calm before the storm. Deep in thought.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Conversation about fostering. Did this take place ?
« Reply #41 on: September 24, 2014, 06:47:PM »
Jeremy is the only witness to this conversation.

A lot seemed to go on in the short period Jeremy was at WHF, the evening before the massacre.

It was late,  Sheila & June should have eaten. Neville tired after a long day.  Rather than being in bed, or in other rooms they were all apparently sitting in the kitchen.

Jeremy seemed to simultaneously notice rabbits, load the rifle, go outside, and hear discussions about fostering.

Other posters have said Sheila's medical condition meant she was most likely to react in an aggressive way straight away if fostering was mentioned.  Rather than be unresponsive and then suddenly go crazy hours later, unprovoked.

Colin Caffell had custody of the children, so Neville & June would have to speak to him. I have never read that they did.

Wasn't Sheila going to move into Jeremy's cottage ? Meaning Neville, June and other relatives would be nearby and able to assist? Something June and Neville would love doing. Not sure why fostering was needed as the twins spent most of the time with CC anyway.

I suppose Jeremy had to say something that people would think would act as a trigger for Sheila. The Folkes's said Sheila seemed happy enough at the time. I would be happy living rent free in London and going on a free summer holiday.

Sadly for the defence,  the judge said Sheila's non responsiveness to the alleged fostering conversations meant it cannot be used as a reason for the later outburst.

Do other people believe the fostering conversation took place ?

There are 2 different questions really when did it take place and what was actually discussed during it?

Jeremy tells different stories of what was discussed.  A first he made it sound like the kids would be taken away from Sheila and that is what he told Collin- that June and Nevill planned to have Sheila give the kids up for adoption.

But Jeremy later changed to saying they just talked to her about part time foster care and that she had little reaction to it. There is support that they were in fact considering part time foster care help so this is actually plausible while them arranging for Sheila to give up custody is not.

I tend to think they did have the conversation but that Jeremy might have lied about when they had the conversation. He might have made up that it was the night of the murders just to support his claim that Sheila did it they could have told Sheila prior in the day or a prior day even.   

I find it interesting that he said she had little reaction as opposed to saying she flipped out. If he was making up the conversaiton he would have made up that she blew up as well.  So I tend to think it did happen and that she did have little reaction though it probably happened a different time than he claims and his later account of it just eing about par ttim eforste rcare is what really was discussed.
 
He walked back a lot of his initial claims to police the night of the murders such as that they were going to force her to give up custody.  He did relate such lies to Collin hough and even told Collin there was a heated argument that was ongoing as he left.  Interestingly enough though that is not what he put in his statement.  In his statement he said she had little reaction and Nevill said they could discuss it further another time.  He decided to lie to Collin to get Collin to believe that Sheila did it. 

   
When it took place
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry