Any other examples of jilted woman testifying against former lovers ?

[Jane]

Desperate, pathetic post. And wrong

Even Jeremy has only given one reason - he apparently jilted her.

That would be describing your own posts, then, I guess.

[Adam]

No I don't and I have n idea what you're rambling on about. No one is talking about JULIE'S cheque book FRAUD!!

So how was Julie talking to the police keeping her out of prison ?

[Jane]

Anyway.

There is only one example of a jilted woman testifying against a former lover. This was ten years later. The man, Chris Huhne got convicted.

Julie testifying against an innocent man because she was (apparently) jilted is in a minority of.....er one.

Probably NOT. We can rest assured you won't be going out of your way to fin d proof of something you have no wish to see proved.

[Jane]

So how was Julie talking to the police keeping her out of prison ?

Did you read the WS Jansus posted? Probably not. I guess it doesn't fit with what you think.

[Adam]

Probably NOT. We can rest assured you won't be going out of your way to fin d proof of something you have no wish to see proved.

I did have a quick look and found one case. The woman testifying ten years later, not 30 days.  The man, Huhne,  still being found guilty.

I thought Jeremy's supporters and people that dislike Julie would find more to back up their own theories.

[Adam]

Did you read the WS Jansus posted? Probably not. I guess it doesn't fit with what you think.

I did read it. It is saying nothing about the police knowing about Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud prior to Julies WS being completed.

But nice try.

[Jane]

I did have a quick look and found one case. The woman testifying ten years later, not 30 days. 

I thought Jeremy's supporters and people that dislike Julie would find more to back up their own theories.

 With your thought processes as your only frame of reference, you probably find it difficult to get your head round what others might think

[susan]

Adam we will tell you when you are a little older you are far too young just now

[Jane]

I did read it. It is saying nothing about the police knowing about Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud prior to Julies WS being completed.

But nice try.

But as you know, or maybe not, Susan Battersby didn't commit a cheque book fraud. And it was decided NOT to press charges against Julie because her testimony was important. What was it about a nice try?

[Adam]

But as you know, or maybe not, Susan Battersby didn't commit a cheque book fraud. And it was decided NOT to press charges against Julie because her testimony was important. What was it about a nice try?

That is correct. And the right thing for the police to do. They had to look at the big picture.

But Julie was not forced into speaking, as people on here used to always claim.

The police knew nothing about Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud until after she had completed  her WS.

[susan]

Adam why do you have a need to keep referring to it as a minor cheque book fraud.  It appears that you are trying to convince yourself that it was just MINOR.  No cheque book fraud is minor it is FRAUD.

[Jane]

Adam why do you have a need to keep referring to it as a minor cheque book fraud.  It appears that you are trying to convince yourself that it was just MINOR.  No cheque book fraud is minor it is FRAUD.

Diversionary tactics, Susan. He uses them deliberately to take the thread off course.......................especially when he's not winning, he resorts to wind ups.

[Caroline]

So how was Julie talking to the police keeping her out of prison ?

Seriously? You don't know the answer to that?

[Jane]

Seriously? You don't know the answer to that?

He doesn't actually believe Julie did anything wrong, Caroline. It was all Jeremy and Susan Battersby. Poor, misunderstood Julie, eh?

[Adam]

Seriously? You don't know the answer to that?

I don't. That is why I asked the question.

When she spent a month compiling her WS, the police knew nothing about Susan Battersby's 1984 minor cheque book fraud.

She told the police about Jeremy's caravan break in. The police had no idea.  Jeremy admitted to this after the police asked him. So something Julie said was right then.

But I do not understand how Julie approaching the police was her way of staying out of prison.