A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll

[lookout]

It's time for closure on this.

And it's time for the people who clicked on 'yes' to retract. Although you are all perfectly entitled to still believe Bamber is innocent. 

Even Bamber himself testified that Neville did not call the police. Changing his mind decades later.

It was impossible for either of them to make a 3.36am phone call. Read my thread on page 1.

Therefore there was one call made at 3.26am. Jeremy meeting the police at WHF 22 minutes later.

Closure my eye.How do you think Jeremy feels ?

[scipio_usmc]

Closure my eye.How do you think Jeremy feels ?

Jeremy regrets making the mistake she did that got him busted and still hopes to find some claim that could fool a court into thinking he is innocent.

 

[lookout]

At one time he wouldn't have been convicted unless it was a majority vote 12/12.
Two people during the mass murder trial,thought he was innocent.Why do you think that was ?

[Jane]

At one time he wouldn't have been convicted unless it was a majority vote 12/12.
Two people during the mass murder trial,thought he was innocent.Why do you think that was ?

Lookout, would that not have been going back to the time when murder was a hanging offence? I know that you still favour this as a form -the ULTIMATE form- of punishment so I can understand how difficult it would be for you to take on board the possibility of Jeremy's guilt.

[lookout]

Lookout, would that not have been going back to the time when murder was a hanging offence? I know that you still favour this as a form -the ULTIMATE form- of punishment so I can understand how difficult it would be for you to take on board the possibility of Jeremy's guilt.

April, I'm really not sure when,or why this " unanimous decision " came about. It may possibly have been since the 60's when Mr Pierrepoint " retired ",I don't know.
 

[lookout]

No matter what,I can't accept that Jeremy is guilty. In my mind,there's absolutely nothing that pins it on him at all. I'm at an utter loss to even come up with anything like a hint of him having done it.

[Jane]

No matter what,I can't accept that Jeremy is guilty. In my mind,there's absolutely nothing that pins it on him at all. I'm at an utter loss to even come up with anything like a hint of him having done it.

I understand. I feel EXACTLY the same about JM...................in reverse, of course. I think she's ALMOST as guilty as Jeremy and I HATE that she's allowing him to do some of the time she, IMO, should be doing, but I DO have to ask myself if I'm being entirely fair in my assessment of her and looking at it from an entirely emotional stance. In which case, I may well have got it wrong..................but I hope I haven't.

[susan]

April don't think you have it wrong about JM or Jeremy Bamber.

[scipio_usmc]

No matter what,I can't accept that Jeremy is guilty. In my mind,there's absolutely nothing that pins it on him at all. I'm at an utter loss to even come up with anything like a hint of him having done it.

Everytime the evidence is posted that proves his guilt it is criticized as being too long and dismissed by you for no vlaid reaosn.  You can't refue the evidence and thus feel he is innocent for that reason you just refuse to face he is guilty because you do't want to.

[scipio_usmc]

I understand. I feel EXACTLY the same about JM...................in reverse, of course. I think she's ALMOST as guilty as Jeremy and I HATE that she's allowing him to do some of the time she, IMO, should be doing, but I DO have to ask myself if I'm being entirely fair in my assessment of her and looking at it from an entirely emotional stance. In which case, I may well have got it wrong..................but I hope I haven't.

At best one can suspect that after Jeremy told Julie of his intentionas that she encouraged him to go through with it.  There is no evidence she actually helped plan it nor is it likely she did so.  She might have encouraged him but then again might not we don't know for sure we just suspect she may have.

For sure we know that she initially tried to help cover for Jeremy by omitting information and not telling police things that they clearly would have liked to know right away.  She certainly deserves scorn for that.  She knew he was responsible but protected him anyway.  A lot of people cover for loved ones but it still doesn't make it right.   


   

[Alias]

What do you call a person who HAS to have the last word ??

Annoying. 

[Jane]

What do you call a person who HAS to have the last word ??

ADAM

[Adam]

ADAM

Wrong.

[Jane]

Wrong.

Adam wrong? Hmm, I can go with that.

[Jan]

Adam - your post said it is time to have closure on all this - but you have had closure.

You have not asked a single  question that you yourself had not made up your mind what  the answer is before you post.

So you already have closure - you know 100% in your mind that Jeremy is guilty - so your closure is the most simple of all.

Don't post anymore and find yourself another case to read about.