A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll

[No-Bits]

I thought there would be thousands of voters ?

Not the first time that you've been mistaken, nor the last I suspect. 

[nugnug]

wouldent there have to be thousands of members for that.

[Caroline]

wouldent there have to be thousands of members that.

Exactly Nugs! Jackie is trying to be sarcastic towards a comment I made about thousands of people thinking Jeremy guilty. However, obviously I was talking about in the population as a whole, not in respect to the forum. She didn't really think it through though and it's kind of back fired - but she's no doubt used to that! 

[No-Bits]

Exactly Nugs! Jackie is trying to be sarcastic towards a comment I made about thousands of people thinking Jeremy guilty. However, obviously I was talking about in the population as a whole, not in respect to the forum. She didn't really think it through though and it's kind of back fired - but she's no doubt used to that! 

For whatever reason, it does seem to be a regular occurrence.   

[nugnug]

Exactly Nugs! Jackie is trying to be sarcastic towards a comment I made about thousands of people thinking Jeremy guilty. However, obviously I was talking about in the population as a whole, not in respect to the forum. She didn't really think it through though and it's kind of back fired - but she's no doubt used to that! 

i cant see the point of all this because the fact thousands of people do or do not think something doesn't make it true.

[No-Bits]

i cant see the point of all this because the fact thousands of people do or do not think something doesn't make it true.

It doesn't, but that's Jackie for you. 

[Reader]

The poll is currently indicating that about a third of those who voted are either undecided or believe that the evidence points to a call from Nevill to EP. That suggests this issue is far from being an open and shut case.

[guest154]

The poll is currently indicating that about a third of those who voted are either undecided or believe that the evidence points to a call from Nevill to EP. That suggests this issue is far from being an open and shut case.

I'd  like to see what evidence they base it on, one of the people who has voted YES bases it on the fact the phone was engaged, that's not evidence it is just wishful thinking and I don't see how you can base a phone call from Neville on that.

Why do you think the legal team haven't used this phone call from Neville in the appeals?

[Caroline]

The poll is currently indicating that about a third of those who voted are either undecided or believe that the evidence points to a call from Nevill to EP. That suggests this issue is far from being an open and shut case.

Actually as Curious made a mistake, the 'No' vote is 11 and the 'yes' vote is 2. In terms of the forum, it's pretty clear what the majority of 'active, regular' posters think - even if you do choose to be in denial about that also.

[Reader]

I took that into account in my calculation. I calculated 5/16, which is about 1/3.

[nugnug]

how many members have actully voted and what diffrence does it make anyway.

[guest154]

how many members have actully voted and what diffrence does it make anyway.

Who is trying to make a difference or saying that this makes any difference. It's a poll asking forum opinion on a certain matter, nothing more and nothing less.

[susan]

Hello Mat  quite right it is no more than that is is not going to hinder or help Jeremy Bambers case just opinions of posters on the forum at the time.

[scipio_usmc]

The time 3:36 is in Pc West's log, the time 3:26 is in Jeremy's interview, and the time 3:35 is in Pc Saxby's statement. Despite the court label on Bonnett's log, there are no specific references to the log's content until much later (2004?). It's very unlikely that Mr Rivlin had seen it, as he would have noticed that it commences without mentioning Jeremy and gives Sheila's age as 26. Curiously, Bonnett's COLP statement gives virtually no details of what Pc West said to him. There are no references to Bonnett's log in the 2002 appeal judgement.

You are just playing more games.  3:36 came from West.  3:26 came from bonnett's log that was a trial exhibit.  All you are doing is demonstrating you will distort to try to pretend you have some basis for your claims though you have none.

You can't even claim to be arguing in good faith anymore.   Your suggestion that West wasted his time taking all the information he previously obtained from Nevill all over again from Jeremy in order to conceal Nevill's call from Jeremy in case in the future police wanted to pretend Nevill's call never happened is so absurd that I am still amazed you made it.  Your credibility has gone to zero on this issue.   

[susan]

Caroline I am still trying to figure out Reader's calculation in my eyes the NO vote is ahead.  Wonder if the same will happen in Scotland