A Call To Essex Police From Neville? - The poll

[Caroline]

Feel free to discuss the reason behind your vote.

[guest154]

No.

The evidence clearly shows what it is, and that isn't a call from Neville.  It even states where the information came from, Nevilles son Jeremy.

[lookout]

It was done while Jeremy was trying to ring his father back. Jeremy couldn't get through because his dads' phone was engaged,which was Neville calling the police soon after he'd phoned his son.

[nugnug]

well that would stand to reason but wouldn't explain why theirs no record of it.

[lookout]

Those dial phones seemed to take an age when you were in a hurry.No push button immediate action then,it was a slow process of dialling 7 numbers and waiting each time for the dial to go back to nought before you could ring the next number. I'd imagine Jeremy would have tried a couple of times before he realised he wasn't going to get through.

[scipio_usmc]

well that would stand to reason but wouldn't explain why theirs no record of it.

Are you the one who voted undecided?

[guest154]

It was done while Jeremy was trying to ring his father back. Jeremy couldn't get through because his dads' phone was engaged,which was Neville calling the police soon after he'd phoned his son.

What document/evidence/statement is this based on?

[scipio_usmc]

It was done while Jeremy was trying to ring his father back. Jeremy couldn't get through because his dads' phone was engaged,which was Neville calling the police soon after he'd phoned his son.

But what makes you say there was a call at all?

The phone was found off the hook when police entered.  That alone explains why Jeremy and police would get a busy signal if trying to call.

[lookout]

What document/evidence/statement is this based on?

It isn't. It's my own way of thinking because we had such phones in the house at the time,and to just press either one button,or a few today,is a doddle to what it used to be.It was time consuming too if you got a number wrong because you had to start all over again. They certainly weren't the quickest of communicators,the old dial-up phones.

[lookout]

But what makes you say there was a call at all?

The phone was found off the hook when police entered.  That alone explains why Jeremy and police would get a busy signal if trying to call.

Because I knew those old phones,we had them ourselves.So the phone was off the hook ? None of us know why at that juncture,but I don't look upon it as being suspicious.

[scipio_usmc]

Because I knew those old phones,we had them ourselves.So the phone was off the hook ? None of us know why at that juncture,but I don't look upon it as being suspicious.

You used Jeremy getting a busy signal to suggest Nevill was on the phone with police as Jeremy tried to call.  But he could have gotten the busy signal simply because the phone was left off the hook, it doesn't mean a call was being made.

Why do you believe a call was made by Nevill to police?

[Caroline]

It isn't. It's my own way of thinking because we had such phones in the house at the time,and to just press either one button,or a few today,is a doddle to what it used to be.It was time consuming too if you got a number wrong because you had to start all over again. They certainly weren't the quickest of communicators,the old dial-up phones.

And yet Neville is supposed to have used it to call Jeremy and then later to call police but using the 999 number which would have been quicker. Your reason seems to support Neville NOT having used it rather than having used it.

[No-Bits]

No.
Nothing suggests there was a call. It is nonsense.

The bonkers claim was originally that Nevill spoke to Bonnett and Jeremy spoke to West. It was only after people realised that the number 1990 recorded on the log was actually West's PC number that more people realised the devious attempt to mislead. The log was even published in a newspaper claiming Bonnett's log to be from a conversation with Nevill.

Now, that has finally been realised, we now have the member known as 'Reader' attempting to convince people that it was actually West that spoke to both Nevill and Jeremy and he used the single log to record and merge both conversations. 

It's all very desperate and I can't even begin to explain why people are sucked in by any of this. 

Each to their own though. 

[Caroline]

No.
Nothing suggests there was a call. It is nonsense.

The bonkers claim was originally that Nevill spoke to Bonnett and Jeremy spoke to West. It was only after people realised that the number 1990 recorded on the log was actually West's PC number that more people realised the devious attempt to mislead. The log was even published in a newspaper claiming Bonnett's log to be from a conversation with Nevill.

Now, that has finally been realised, we now have the member known as 'Reader' attempting to convince people that it was actually West that spoke to both Nevill and Jeremy and he used the single log to record and merge both conversations. 

It's all very desperate and I can't even begin to explain why people are sucked in by any of this. 

Each to their own though. 

The fact that it even goes against what the OS says is quite odd. The whole event has been rewritten to try and make it fit - and it 'still' doesn't fit!

[lookout]

You used Jeremy getting a busy signal to suggest Nevill was on the phone with police as Jeremy tried to call.  But he could have gotten the busy signal simply because the phone was left off the hook, it doesn't mean a call was being made.

Why do you believe a call was made by Nevill to police?

I believe Neville called the police when Jeremy tried ringing back his father and found the phone engaged. Which meant someone at WHF was using the phone,and it wasn't Jeremy !