The Week of the Murders

[No-Bits]

Caroline you have been bullied since you changed your stance to guilty.  Don't let them get to you as you do a great job and the forum would be a sorry state without you.  You have some good loyal friends on here who will always support you because you are a nice fair minded person. XXX

I'd also like to add that she did a very good job even before she changed her stance.
Obviously other admins and mods also do a very good job.

[Caroline]

She tries, and you answer back. So not bullying then.

Which is why I said 'tries' is there something wrong with your eyesight?

[ngb1066]

I don't think that Alias is a 'proper' moderator? But I for one certainly think that she should be. Alias is intelligent,level headed and very lovely,but also assertive which,I feel is an important requirement as a moderator. Having Alias as a moderator would also balance out our current moderators regarding the guilty/innocence stance and would be fairer. Imo.

Alias has full moderator powers and I have invited her to use them at any time she feels it appropriate.

[susan]

Harters Shame shame

[Adam]

Which is why I said 'tries' is there something wrong with your eyesight?

I have excellent eyes. Why are you mentioning my eyes ?

And why is everyone talking about you being bullied ? You just said she tries. You will answer back and all you're buddies will rally round you. So no bullying.

Other posters have said you over moderate me. Saying I am not allowed to say 'thread already created' or provide links to threads to answer someone's question.

Then saying 'no one, and I mean no one is interested in reading you're threads'. Then banning me when I respond.

Over moderating me is another form of bullying.

[No-Bits]

Harters Shame shame

Well it's a thankless task isn't it. It beats me why people make the effort, although it's great that they do.

[Caroline]

I have excellent eyes. Why are you mentioning my eyes ?

And why is everyone talking about you being bullied ? You just said she tries. You will answer back and all you're buddies will rally round you. So no bullying.

Other posters have said you over moderate me. Saying I am not allowed to say 'thread already created' or provide links to threads to answer someone's question.

Then saying 'no one, and I mean no one is interested in reading you're threads'. Then banning me when I respond.

Over moderating me is another form of bullying.

Oh I see - we're chewing a few sour grapes are we?  Bite hard Adam!! 

[Caroline]

Well it's a thankless task isn't it. It beats me why people make the effort, although it's great that they do.

I'm beginning to wonder that myself!

[Caroline]

I'd also like to add that she did a very good job even before she changed her stance.
Obviously other admins and mods also do a very good job.

Thanks Harters - it's nice to be appreciated 

[susan]

Caroline I told you other posters respected you when you were on the innocent stance just as much as where you are now.

[Adam]

Adam I guess you have been on a different forum than the rest of us.  I now feel and I have suspected you are here to cause unrest on the forum as you disagreed with me when I said Jeremy Bamber was innocent then when I changed my stance you still disagreed with me.

I disagreed with you at the weekend over Julie being forced to tell lies by the police.

The police had nothing on her and she approached the police herself, Liz Rimmington inviting Stan Jones over. Julie being in the room.

I created a thread yesterday explaining why Julie did not not speak for 30 days. Another issue people are always criticising her for. I welcome you're opinion on the thread.

[Caroline]

Caroline I told you other posters respected you when you were on the innocent stance just as much as where you are now.

Thanks Susan 

[susan]

Adam I remember last week jansus put up a post to you in which she said "Adam why are you arguing with Susan she is on your side" but hey ho I don't mind you disagreeing with me that is your right but Caroline is a great Mod and is a tremendous asset to this forum and I have seen where you have referred to other posters as stupid and an idiot.  I prefer to discuss the case instead of all this petty backing biting that seems to have started of late

[Jan]

Adam I did not put you on ignore because you highlighted Jeremys guilt .

Harters you  say that people should be thicker skinned - then why have forum rules at all?

If a post breaks the rules then It should be pointed out.

People ahould be able to debate without being rude and personal , and calling posters liars or dis-honest is IMO out of order and against the rules.

[ngb1066]

Adam I did not put you on ignore because you highlighted Jeremys guilt .

Harters you  say that people should be thicker skinned - then why have forum rules at all?

If a post breaks the rules then It should be pointed out.

People ahould be able to debate without being rude and personal , and calling posters liars or dis-honest is IMO out of order and against the rules.

I agree.