Peter Eaton

[nugnug]

i notice poor old sheila hasnt got any shares.

[Alias]

i notice poor old sheila hasnt got any shares.

If she did do illegal drugs - which seh admitted to her doctor she did, she would have sold them to get cash - probably. June and Nevill would have known that.

[nugnug]

she only dope like jeremy did she wasnt a smack head.

[Jane]

If she did do illegal drugs - which seh admitted to her doctor she did, she would have sold them to get cash - probably. June and Nevill would have known that.

She was so rarely at the farm that she wouldn't have become VERY rich from it.

[nugnug]

well i know you wouldent want somone like sheila involved in running the company but you would think they might of given her a 1 percent share or something.

[Alias]

She was so rarely at the farm that she wouldn't have become VERY rich from it.

Sorry April, don´t think I understand? 

[Jane]

Sorry April, don´t think I understand? 

For Sheila to have been able to sell any drugs which were being grown, legally or otherwise, at WHF she would have had to be there on a regular basis to collect them.

[nugnug]

if Jeremy was resentful i cant see any rational reason for him to be.

seems sheila had more to complain about.

[Alias]

For Sheila to have been able to sell any drugs which were being grown, legally or otherwise, at WHF she would have had to be there on a regular basis to collect them.

I was talking about shares. It seems like Nevill and June had given Jeremy some Shares, but not Sheila. Maybe they were afraid she would just sell them for a quick buck (for drugs possibly.)

BTW, was thinking anout the Cannabis allegedly grown by Jeremy at the farm. First of all, how could he do that without Nevill finding out? We have recently seen that the farmland they had at their disposal was not that extensive.
Secondly, how could there have been enough of it for anyone to make a good profit? Julie was supposed to have sold the pot that came out of this. Is this another myth? Was what she was selling rather smuggled into the country?

[scipio_usmc]

It seems clear from everything I have read that Peter Eaton was branded a thief by BW but it seems like monies stolen by him has been brushed aside which seems extraordinary considering what has been said about Jeremy

Is it accepted that he was dishonest

Everything you "accept" is the complete opposite of reality.

Her allegations that she suspected he was doign wrong were never substantiated and in fact th eonly person who coudl have been cheated was Ann's brother because they ended up splitting the estate equally.  Since Ann's brother never complained he was cheated the same assumption is that he wasn't.

[nugnug]

thats if the shares were salable assets some company's have rules that you cant sell the shares without approval.

[scipio_usmc]

Re # 30, jansus, where is this from?

I hope you copied/pasted it and din´t type it all. In any case, thanks. 

from jeremy's website

[Alias]

thats if the shares were salable assets some company's have rules that you cant sell the shares without approval.

Who knows, perhaps she had the option of getting shares as well as Jeremy, but preferred cash. Seems to me that the Bambers went out of their way to treat their children equally (and very, very well financially).

[scipio_usmc]

i notice poor old sheila hasnt got any shares.

Sheila wasn't farming.  Jeremy farmed to get the bulk of Nevill's farm assets.  In exchange for farming he was given a share and would receive more down the line until he took over. If he gave up famring while they were alive then he would not be given more and upon death there would be a choice- if he farmed he would get most of the assets with just a small sum of money going to Sheila but if he gave up farming then they would split the proceeds 50/50.

That is part of why he wanted Sheila dead.  With her alive he would have to keep farming because if he stopped farming she would get half.  With her dead he could quit farming and get it all.

 

 

[nugnug]

well even if thares couldent be sold there would be the divendends though and think a 20 percent share would bring in a fair annual dividend.