Surely The Timings Are Incorrect?

[Jane]

Dear Lyla, dear Lyla 

Heheheheheheheheheheeeeeeeeeeee :D Thas a owl int thar bookit. Did I get the accent right?

[lookout]

an'ole----------not a owl.

[Caroline]

Heheheheheheheheheheeeeeeeeeeee :D Thas a owl int thar bookit. Did I get the accent right?

Not quite  more like "thez a howl n'me bukut" 

[Caroline]

Is it Liza or Lyla?

[lookout]

Liza. and 'enrey

[Jane]

Is it Liza or Lyla?

I've always known it as Liza.......................but I like Lyla better

[scipio_usmc]

Whether the contents of phone log 3.26am, amount to HEARSAY, or provided Jeremy with an ALIBI, one thing is certain, and that is that there were no submissions or legal arguments made during the course of the trial, which beggars belief if the contents if the 3.26am lig had been disclosed, or were known about at that time...

As Caroline points out Bonnett's log was used at trial.  Far from the contents of all the logs establishing an alibi for Jeremy they simply detial the same things police said at trial.

The logs don't provide any basis to suggest let alone establish that Nevill spoke to Bonnett. Indeed your claim is that the log was doctored though you have no proof to support your claim.

You don't seem to have any follow through, you just change the subject when someone confronts you. It's like playing whack a mole.  The same moles pop up in the future periodically.  You need new moles it is getting boring.

[JackiePreece]

Actually no one hit the ban button on you - it was connected to IP's which were triggered when Adam was banned but trust you to assume it was on purpose  You're not that important Jackie, no conspiracy! Oh and twice included yesterday!

Perhaps you should try addressing the subject at hand and stop trying to orchestrate things round to whatever point you think fit. Power trip? I think it's you who feels they have some special role in this case but you're just another member.

I'm sure Jeremy doesn't care one way or another that Susan or I think he's guilty, after all, we just join the thousands others who think the same. Perhaps you should ask him ....... oh I forgot, he doesn't write to you anymore either.

Try answering the question at hand being as you never even attempt to answer any case related question but I guess you think you're above that.

Question was (just in case you forgot).

Say Neville did call the police ..... he called Jeremy at 03:10, if he called Bonnet at 03:26 what was he doing for the 16 minutes between calling Jeremy and calling Bonnet? Why is the information exactly the same as on Jeremy's log (different words used - same info), why was the line engaged when Jeremy tried to call back if Neville didn't call the police until 16 mins later and still engaged when West tried calling? Then of course there is the notion that the call was never mentioned to anyone - a call that proved that EP's initial take on the case was correct - Sheila was guilty and Jeremy was innocent. Why would this call be kept secret?

Caroline can you explain what you mean by thousands?
Where did you get this figure from exactly?
You are a moderator on a forum and you are trying to mislead people who view this forum
You are exactly the same as Skippy and Adam with misleading information

[scipio_usmc]

Caroline can you explain what you mean by thousands?
Where did you get this figure from exactly?
You are a moderator on a forum and you are trying to mislead people who view this forum
You are exactly the same as Skippy and Adam with misleading information

There are many millions who believe he is guilty so I guess you are right about her being sloppy with her estimate.

[Jane]

There are many millions who believe he is guilty so I guess you are right about her being sloppy with her estimate.

I'd be VERY surprised if, by now, there were HUNDREDS of thousands, let alone millions, so it could be that there are two of you who are estimate sloppy.

[JackiePreece]

There are many millions who believe he is guilty so I guess you are right about her being sloppy with her estimate.

Another ridiculous statement
Where is your or Carolines source for thousands or millions

[JackiePreece]

Thank you April

Its the story of Jeremys life making 'stuff' up

[nugnug]

i would guess most people do as no opinion poll has every done its imposable to say ethere.

i was actully suprised how many actives supporters he had when i first started reading about the case.

when someones convicted of crime most people will just assume they did it but when they know the facts of case they may be less certain.

[guest154]

There isn't exactly massive public outrage when it comes to the Bamber case. This is a Bamber forum and there are only 10/15 people posting in his defence.

[Jane]

Thank you April

Its the story of Jeremys life making 'stuff' up

Jackie, I fear that this is groveling apology time to Caroline because I had thought it was Scipio's, IMO, rather over expansive "millions" that I was doubting more than the possibility of her "thousands."

I am MORE inclined to believe that Jeremy is guilty but have long noticed that there are aspects of this case which remain the same whether Jeremy is innocent or guilty. They have different meanings according to how one sees Jeremy. What infuriates me -and this is what prompted me to respond to Scipio's post- is seeing people attempting to make him MORE than guilty, ie suggesting that MILLIONS believe it so. Perhaps it's more about point scoring -Scipio LOVES to argue so maybe as long as he believes he's won, the topic isn't important- he even seems to disagree with some of those who support his belief in Jeremy's guilt. It appears Jeremy isn't guilty unless one shares in Scipio's version of guilt.