The family trying to show Jeremy in a bad light

[JackiePreece]

Let's focus then on one of Anne Eatons statements

'Granny Speakman had photos of all the family but I don't think she had a photo of Jeremy amongst them'


what was the point of that statement other than trying to show Jeremy in a bad light'

No proof that Jeremys photo wasn't there so what was the purpose of Annes statement

In other statements Jeremy is described as a poof? does that make him a murderer?

[nugnug]

i wonder what relvance being a poof had to the case my guess is none at all witch makes me wonder why she said it.

[lookout]

Speaking of photos',who was it that tore the one with the twins on it ? You don't do things like that, well a normal person doesn't anyway. Why the little boys ? What did they do to anyone ?

[nugnug]

but why point out there was no photos of Jeremy unassuming this is true of course.

[lookout]

but why point out there was no photos of Jeremy unassuming this is true of course.

There would have been,but were probably burned.

[nugnug]

well as they stayed with the granny and got all her stuff when she dies so they would have controll oover the photos.

[Alias]

Well, I hope granny Speakman had a photo of Jeremy along with all the other family members prior to the murders - if she didn´t, that would have been just mean and low!
I hope that Ann is referring to the time after the murders, where everyone thought Jeremy had done it.

Colin Caffell writes in his book that there was so much hate from the family while each individual was testifying at the trial. He actually worried that those strong expressions of pure hate would harm the prosecution´s case and make the jury feel sorry for Jeremy!

[lookout]

 What a horrible lot of people.

[nugnug]

Well, I hope granny Speakman had a photo of Jeremy along with all the other family members prior to the murders - if she didn´t, that would have been just mean and low!
I hope that Ann is referring to the time after the murders, where everyone thought Jeremy had done it.

Colin Caffell writes in his book that there was so much hate from the family while each individual was testifying at the trial. He actually worried that those strong expressions of pure hate would harm the prosecution´s case and make the jury feel sorry for Jeremy!

i am sure she did have a photo of him.

[Alias]

i am sure she did have a photo of him.

I think so too. It would have been too mean not only towards Jeremy, but also towards her daughter, June, who´s son it was!

[nugnug]

i think there trying to make out that granny dident like Jeremy to justify them getting his share of granny's money.

[scipio_usmc]

What a horrible lot of people.

Hatred towards someone who murdered their loved ones is quite natural and doesn't make them horrible.  Do you realize that for defending a killer for such absurd reaosns that you do, that peopel could consider you horrible.

You are in a glass house and should not be casting stones.

I have challenged you to provide a sound basis for asserting Jeremy is innocdent but you can't you have none so relaly ar ein no position to attack anyone.

[lookout]

Gawd------------here we go.

[Alias]

Quote from Colin´s book. I don´t quite understand him, how can he basically excuse Jeremy who allegedly killed his sons; but in any case, he is not as hateful as the relatives.

"So what else did I see of myself as I looked into those eyes - into the eyes of a cold-blooded murderer? Part of the key has to be in the fact that there had been many occasions I had also wished his sister dead - as I did the night of the killings - and times I had felt murderous towards his mother for the way in which she violated everybody, especially her daughter. Had June still been alive and continued the abuses to my children that I am now more aware of, I myself might have been tempted to kill her. In that respect, Jeremy had saved me the trouble and was standing trial for something I had also wished for.
How then could I stand as an accuser?"

[lookout]

Thanks for that,Alias.