0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
that makes it even more unlikely then. Why would he be that stupid - it does not make the crime any less horrific? OR, LIGHTBULB MOMENT , does that in her mind excuse her still supporting him and sleeping with a murderer for a month because he had not done it by his own hands ?If she was a fantasist and attention seeker then in her own mind that meant she was not really an accessory because he was not the person who had carried out the murders. Hmmm now that does sound more likely. She was going to help the police get him put away but protect her involvement at the same time.
Of course it doesn't make it any less horrific in your or my eye's but maybe it did to Jeremy. I still say he made up the hit man story so that if she blabbed, it could be shown there was no hit man and Julie would be discredited.
I will read his WS soon. Should be interesting.
possible - but quite complicated - I would of thought that if he ever thought she would blab then he would not have told her in the first place . Especially not the words she alleges on the night of the murder .
You mean you haven't read it already? How then can you make any balanced judgments on the matter?
Quite easily thank you. There is a lot of information online. And some good unbiased books. You should try reading one.
I don't think the books you have read could be unbiased or you would be capable of looking at things from both sides.
There is no such thing as an unbiased book, the writer can't help (no matter how hard he/she tries) from influencing how the information is presented. Even history books are biased, depending on the source of the info.
I have. In the meantime I should read Jeremy's statement if I were you and instead of relying on biased books you should do your own research for a change.
I am agreeing and its obvious which way the books are biased that Adam has read.Sometimes it is obvious of the bias just from the title.
