Author Topic: Why would he?  (Read 10593 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #30 on: August 01, 2014, 06:28:PM »
Because innocent men don't need alibis. Jeremy made no mention of any kind of alibi. It is only the gulters and the cops who have used that expression in regard to Bamber.

His alibi was that he was home and his proof was being home to receive a call from Nevill.  The fact you are either too dishonest to admit this too  dumb to realize is says volumes about you.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2014, 06:29:PM »
How could a non alibi be an alibi? If it is not accepted by others then surely it must have occerred to him that it would be a crap alibi. I cannot see any way he could call that an alibi. Has he at any time used the word alibi in regard to the phone call? Or has he at any point used the phone call as a means of defense in order to try and prove that he didn't kill his family?

Of course it's an alibi, his father called him which means he wasn't at the ram when his father was alive, hence, if he was elsewhere, he couldn't have killed him. The fact that it's full of holes means nothing but people argue in support of the phone call quite regularly so, some people obviously believe it and if you think Jeremy is innocent, then you have to believe it. How is it in any way a 'non-alibi'?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2014, 06:30:PM »
Who described him as an actor?

He was described as such at the trial.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #33 on: August 01, 2014, 06:31:PM »
Of course it's an alibi, his father called him which means he wasn't at the ram when his father was alive, hence, if he was elsewhere, he couldn't have killed him. The fact that it's full of holes means nothing but people argue in support of the phone call quite regularly so, some people obviously believe it and if you think Jeremy is innocent, then you have to believe it. How is it in any way a 'non-alibi'?
Show me where Bamber claimed any kind of alibi.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #34 on: August 01, 2014, 06:31:PM »
He was described as such at the trial.
The copper claimed he said it period.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #35 on: August 01, 2014, 06:33:PM »
thats not an albi he needs one for the whole night.

That's the best he could do - he couldn't have one for the time of the murders if he's guilty.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #36 on: August 01, 2014, 06:34:PM »
The copper claimed he said it period.

It was also said at the trial.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #37 on: August 01, 2014, 06:35:PM »
It was also said at the trial.
Who at the trial said it?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2014, 06:36:PM »
That's the best he could do - he couldn't have one for the time of the murders if he's guilty.

he could of aranged an abli with julie mugford he could of got her to come down so she could say he was with her all night.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #39 on: August 01, 2014, 06:37:PM »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #40 on: August 01, 2014, 06:39:PM »
Who at the trial said it?

He was called 'a consummate actor' by Alderidge (or it could have been the judge).
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #41 on: August 01, 2014, 06:45:PM »
He was described as such at the trial.



By whom
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #42 on: August 01, 2014, 06:47:PM »
I imagine whoever planted the silencer evidence made them.

So you are saying he was set up?

You must have an opinion on who?
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #43 on: August 01, 2014, 06:48:PM »
So you are saying he was set up?

You must have an opinion on who?

I have already said that I think Jones instigated the silencer.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #44 on: August 01, 2014, 06:51:PM »
His alibi was that he was home and his proof was being home to receive a call from Nevill.  The fact you are either too dishonest to admit this too  dumb to realize is says volumes about you.

as ive stated before thats not an albi he needed one for whole night and he could of easly got one if he knewneeded it.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2014, 06:53:PM by nugnug »