Jeremy's Debts

[Jane]

Ha Ha april think my reply should have been to Caroline just modified my post but you beat me to it think I am going mad

Hehehehee !!!Welcome to the club

[Caroline]

I still didn't get an answer to my suggestion in the moderators thread.

Are you aiming this at 'just' me? I can't speak for others but I didn't see you post in the mod thread and ONLY saw it AFTER it was pointed out that you (and a few others) had access to the mod board. You just said you PM'd NGB and he thought it was a good idea so you did get an answer or are we all meant to comment? I guess you don't realise it but you are showing bias towards me simply because I changed my mind and that's fine, I can live with that.

[No-Bits]

Are you aiming this at 'just' me? I can't speak for others but I didn't see you post in the mod thread and ONLY saw it AFTER it was pointed out that you (and a few others) had access to the mod board. You just said you PM'd NGB and he thought it was a good idea so you did get an answer or are we all meant to comment? I guess you don't realise it but you are showing bias towards me simply because I changed my mind and that's fine, I can live with that.

Still can't believe you didn't answer Grahame though.    :D

[Caroline]

Caroline are you not too fond of dogs then but I know you are as Emerson said "the only way to have a friend is to be one"  don't think Scipio is looking for friends he is passionate about what he believes happened at WHF and does make some good points he does throw some insults but do what I do don't take them on board  he is not a bad guy and puts up some funny posts especially fat ladies shakin their booty running after him down the street

Hi Susan, the dog comment is from something I read and ever since I read it, I keep hearing it mentioned by other people. I'll explain another time 

[Caroline]

Still can't believe you didn't answer Grahame though.    :D

Ill wear a horse hair coat for a week!! 

[grahameb]

Are you aiming this at 'just' me? I can't speak for others but I didn't see you post in the mod thread and ONLY saw it AFTER it was pointed out that you (and a few others) had access to the mod board. You just said you PM'd NGB and he thought it was a good idea so you did get an answer or are we all meant to comment? I guess you don't realise it but you are showing bias towards me simply because I changed my mind and that's fine, I can live with that.

No I'm not aiming it at you Caroline. If you saw my original complaint you will see that I was addressing all the moderators.
I'm not showing bias towards you because you have changed your mind. I was just making an observation that I used to enjoy reading your posts because they were not only powerful but contained substance as well. I just vthink its a pity that you appear to have limited your scope a bit that's all. It's easy to swim with the flow and agree with the guilters, who think they've got the case all sewn up. But I see problems with the case that others either don't seem aware of, or are unwilling to face them?
But as for me since you've changed your stance I don't find the forum so interesting now.

[Jan]

Do you remember I suggested a little green thumbs up for a good post ?

Well perhaps we could think of a special smiley for when someone is being RUDE and PERSONAL and you perceive their post as offensive ?

But unfortunately there are certain people who might make it a personal challenge to see how many they could accumulate , but then that would just about sum up their mentality.

[Alias]

Do you remember I suggested a little green thumbs up for a good post ?

Well perhaps we could think of a special smiley for when someone is being RUDE and PERSONAL and you perceive their post as offensive ?

But unfortunately there are certain people who might make it a personal challenge to see how many they could accumulate , but then that would just about sum up their mentality.

We used to have that - and people got really upset, when they saw that they had gotten a lot of "dislikes". Some crazy poster (who is not here anymore) sat up all night to "smite" certain people as many times as possible. I think you could use that function once per hour.
A lot of hassle about the "smites". 
I thought it was rather funny and didn´t mind being "smited". 

[Jan]

We used to have that - and people got really upset, when they saw that they had gotten a lot of "dislikes". Some crazy poster (who is not here anymore) sat up all night to "smite" certain people as many times as possible. I think you could use that function once per hour.
A lot of hassle about the "smites". 
I thought it was rather funny and didn´t mind being "smited". 

yes I had been told that before - which is strange as it works on other forums - but maybe they are not as controversial as this one

[No-Bits]

We used to have that - and people got really upset, when they saw that they had gotten a lot of "dislikes". Some crazy poster (who is not here anymore) sat up all night to "smite" certain people as many times as possible. I think you could use that function once per hour.
A lot of hassle about the "smites". 
I thought it was rather funny and didn´t mind being "smited". 

Sorry 'bout that. 

[Alias]

Sorry 'bout that. 

HAHAHA! So it was YOU!
Harters, I know who it was.... wasn´t you....
But we can make a new poll about whether we should have the smite thing back, and you can get to sit up all night smiting us! 

[scipio_usmc]

HAHAHA! So it was YOU!
Harters, I know who it was.... wasn´t you....
But we can make a new poll about whether we should have the smite thing back, and you can get to sit up all night smiting us! 

I personally think it would be silly and pointless.  They have it on many comment sections of news sites and it usually just reflectts childish behavior and often stifles subtance instead of encouraging it.

I was going to say it sounds corny and immature even before I heard about someone sitting there smiting on purpose all night long, good grief.

As is it now if you like a post you have to respond and say so and hopefully express why, that is superior to an anonymous thumbs up or down.

[Caroline]

yes I had been told that before - which is strange as it works on other forums - but maybe they are not as controversial as this one

It was a disaster - dummy's everywhere!! 

[Caroline]

No I'm not aiming it at you Caroline. If you saw my original complaint you will see that I was addressing all the moderators.
I'm not showing bias towards you because you have changed your mind. I was just making an observation that I used to enjoy reading your posts because they were not only powerful but contained substance as well. I just vthink its a pity that you appear to have limited your scope a bit that's all. It's easy to swim with the flow and agree with the guilters, who think they've got the case all sewn up. But I see problems with the case that others either don't seem aware of, or are unwilling to face them?
But as for me since you've changed your stance I don't find the forum so interesting now.

On the one hand, I see lots of problems but also, on the other, see that Jeremy did a lot of suspicious things and I don't want to ignore either hand that's all.

[No-Bits]

HAHAHA! So it was YOU!
Harters, I know who it was.... wasn´t you....
But we can make a new poll about whether we should have the smite thing back, and you can get to sit up all night smiting us! 

 

We brought it back quite recently,  I think after discussing it with Caroline, she thought it would liven the forum up a bit (she wasn't on the forum when it was originally in play). It was soon apparent that the majority of people on this forum are whinging, whining, petty children.  So it got dumped again.

Although, being a whinging, whining, petty child myself, I quite liked the system.  :D