Jeremy's Debts

[Caroline]

i admit you have a point there the only thing i can think of is being woken up at that time of the morning he wasnt really with it.

i think he did offer an explantion for this himself it might be on his websight.

Well, if I wasn't with it, I'd still think of calling 999 first once I had decided to involve the police.

[nugnug]

i think jeremy did give some explantion for this somewhere if i can find it.

[scipio_usmc]

i think jeremy did give some explantion for this somewhere if i can find it.

He gave several DIFFERENT explanations for such.  The one he gave at trial was he didn't think that Nevill's call was urgent but eventually he came to change his mind.

[grahameb]

He gave several DIFFERENT explanations for such.  The one he gave at trial was he didn't think that Nevill's call was urgent but eventually he came to change his mind.

Could you please post those different explanations?

[grahameb]

Yes, I understand that but, he did make the decision to call the police so Social Services would have found out anyway so why not call 999? He wouldn't have had to search for the number and it would have been an immediate response.

He had an immediate response anyway. But why is it even an issue if he didn't dial 999? It doesn't make sense to question it.

[grahameb]

Crispy would certainly hear Sheila going crazy with a gun. But it seems June didn't, being shot through the neck with her head on the pillow.

Sheila preferred to shoot her sleeping sons 8 times, brutally beat and shoot Neville and shoot June. But did not fire a single shot at at Crispy.

Which of course if Bamber did hate the dog would have done anyway. So what's your point? The dog was found hiding under the bed. Which of course poses the question where was the dog originally?

[No-Bits]

Eh? I haven't met him!! I wrote and asked him a few questions!! 

Is he aware of this forum and what sort of discussions take place? Is he aware of individual members of this forum?

Just curious really.

[grahameb]

That's three people sticking the knife into Caroline  since she dared speak up- how dare she be honest with how she is feeling. What a bitch.

So you are implying that I am not honest? Because I choose to be neutral I am accused and mocked continually for being so. But a classic biased person sees suspicion in everything Bamber said and did. I don't go over entirely because I believe there are still legitimate questions to be asked. But it appears to me that every one in the guilty party can only look at things from one side. Which cannot be good. I can and do question things on both sides and I am mocked for it. That is the kind of people those who believe him to be guilty are keeping company with.

[nugnug]

hes certanly aware of the forum im not sure about the discussion.

this was jailed before the internet was invented so i doubt he really understands what forums are.

[Caroline]

Is he aware of this forum and what sort of discussions take place? Is he aware of individual members of this forum?

Just curious really.

Yes, he knows about the forum, he doesn't like it and I don't know if he knows about individual members, if he does, it's not from me.

[No-Bits]

So you are implying that I am not honest? Because I choose to be neutral I am accused and mocked continually for being so. But a classic biased person sees suspicion in everything Bamber said and did. I don't go over entirely because I believe there are still legitimate questions to be asked. But it appears to me that every one in the guilty party can only look at things from one side. Which cannot be good. I can and do question things on both sides and I am mocked for it. That is the kind of people those who believe him to be guilty are keeping company with.

Neutral?  lol

There's no shame in admitting that you are a 'GULLIBLE' you know.  :D

[grahameb]

Is he aware of this forum and what sort of discussions take place? Is he aware of individual members of this forum?

Just curious really.

Yes he is aware of this forum and he doesn't agree with it. He has asked Mike to stop it. This is the reason why Scott Lomax will not join this forum. He thinks it is against Jeremy's wishes and so will not join.

[guest154]

So you are implying that I am not honest? Because I choose to be neutral I am accused and mocked continually for being so. But a classic biased person sees suspicion in everything Bamber said and did. I don't go over entirely because I believe there are still legitimate questions to be asked. But it appears to me that every one in the guilty party can only look at things from one side. Which cannot be good. I can and do question things on both sides and I am mocked for it. That is the kind of people those who believe him to be guilty are keeping company with.

Well firstly......Neutral? I am shocked you even had the nerve to type that word to be honest.


I think it is clear I was talking about Caroline - I said "Caroline." I said "SHE"... I didn't mention the honesty or lack of honesty of anybody else.

You say you're mocked for being neutral and questioning things - but you do the same to Caroline.

[Caroline]

So you are implying that I am not honest? Because I choose to be neutral I am accused and mocked continually for being so. But a classic biased person sees suspicion in everything Bamber said and did. I don't go over entirely because I believe there are still legitimate questions to be asked. But it appears to me that every one in the guilty party can only look at things from one side. Which cannot be good. I can and do question things on both sides and I am mocked for it. That is the kind of people those who believe him to be guilty are keeping company with.

I don't think for one moment you're being dishonest but what I don't understand is if you are neutral, why you 'seem' to have a dig at me when I'm simply expressing what I also believe? I'm not biased it's just what I believe - I can't help my beliefs no more than you can help yours and good debate questions everything.

[nugnug]

Yes he is aware of this forum and he doesn't agree with it. He has asked Mike to stop it. This is the reason why Scott Lomax will not join this forum. He thinks it is against Jeremy's wishes and so will not join.

does he really understand the internet though.

im he was jailed before its invention and prisnors arnt allowed access to it.