Author Topic: the hitman  (Read 15467 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: the hitman
« Reply #240 on: September 17, 2014, 06:12:PM »
jansus I agree both are excellent posters and so is Caroline who seems to be in the firing line just now since she changed her stance.  Hope it can be all sorted out.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the hitman
« Reply #241 on: September 17, 2014, 06:19:PM »
Alias

Not once, his posts are ridiculous as usual

As for the numerous comments from other members about me being rude ?
I can't recall me being rude just outspoken??

In fact the owner of the company I work bought me a sign for me desk that says it all

He is in quite a powerful position and right behind me with campaigning for Jeremy

You are the one claiming you were communicating in private and right after it Alias posted which suggested she is the one you were communicating with.  I didn't see your post where you said it was someone else not her.  She has been complaining for some time about the same thing also leading to the inference.

If I had seen your post where you denied the claim then I would not have asserted it, it is that simple.  I already said I was wrong about such and that is all that can be said.
 

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: the hitman
« Reply #242 on: September 17, 2014, 06:29:PM »
Christ,the way I see it is yes--------------complain when you have as many as 5 who are hostile towards you, but 1 ?    Come on-----. It's never stopped me.
 Pretty thick-skinned you see.Must be the water. ;D ;D


Hey,I could even name them------------but I won't. They know who they are.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: the hitman
« Reply #243 on: September 17, 2014, 06:37:PM »
You are the one claiming you were communicating in private and right after it Alias posted which suggested she is the one you were communicating with. I didn't see your post where you said it was someone else not her.  She has been complaining for some time about the same thing also leading to the inference.

If I had seen your post where you denied the claim then I would not have asserted it, it is that simple.  I already said I was wrong about such and that is all that can be said.
 

In fact I said the opposite; but that is how it is with you, you half-read people´s posts, then accuse them of whatever pops into your biased mind. Not that factual, are you?