Author Topic: the hitman  (Read 15469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: the hitman
« Reply #225 on: September 17, 2014, 02:40:PM »
Funny how you now keep saying you are on the fence, since Grahame left & Susan, Caroline & April turned. Leaving poor Janus & Lookout on their own.

You were always very pro Jeremy before. Putting me on ignore because I suggested his guilt.





Nothing " poor " about me,Adam.What makes you say that ? Do you think I care a fig what anyone else thinks ? It's clear you don't know me.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: the hitman
« Reply #226 on: September 17, 2014, 02:49:PM »
Adam you take it from me lookout can look after herself and Alias was never definite one way or another on her stance on Jeremy Bamber.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the hitman
« Reply #227 on: September 17, 2014, 04:39:PM »
Adam you take it from me lookout can look after herself and Alias was never definite one way or another on her stance on Jeremy Bamber.

Lookout may not care how she comes across but the fact remains she comes across as someone completely ignorant of the actual facts of this case and only posting myths including most recently her bogus claim about one of Sheial's nails being torn off.  Her bias is undeniable.  She even said that Nevill calling police and Jeremy both makes no sense but fater having it explained to her that the call would help establish Jeremy's innocence she changed her stance and says it happened. 

A couple of weeks ago while reading old threads I came across a post where Alias asserted his innocence.  Her recent posting certainly suggests she maintains that position.  In fact she is griping because her pro Jeremy stances have been torn apart and she doesn't like it being proved wrong.  As  a result she has been pouting and communicating with Jackie in private.  That alone reveals her loyalties who would communicate with Jackie unless a staunch Jeremy supporter?

I have seen a large amount of tention here because a number of pro-Jeremy supporters are extremely unhappy that the myths are being peeled away and that they are stuck admitting they have nothing to support their position only bias drives them.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the hitman
« Reply #228 on: September 17, 2014, 04:55:PM »
lookout gave her soursce ignore iit if you wish but we all know she did.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2014, 05:14:PM by nugnug »

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Re: the hitman
« Reply #229 on: September 17, 2014, 04:57:PM »
Lookout may not care how she comes across but the fact remains she comes across as someone completely ignorant of the actual facts of this case and only posting myths including most recently her bogus claim about one of Sheial's nails being torn off.  Her bias is undeniable.  She even said that Nevill calling police and Jeremy both makes no sense but fater having it explained to her that the call would help establish Jeremy's innocence she changed her stance and says it happened. 

A couple of weeks ago while reading old threads I came across a post where Alias asserted his innocence.  Her recent posting certainly suggests she maintains that position.  In fact she is griping because her pro Jeremy stances have been torn apart and she doesn't like it being proved wrong.  As  a result she has been pouting and communicating with Jackie in private.  That alone reveals her loyalties who would communicate with Jackie unless a staunch Jeremy supporter?

I have seen a large amount of tention here because a number of pro-Jeremy supporters are extremely unhappy that the myths are being peeled away and that they are stuck admitting they have nothing to support their position only bias drives them.

Scipio - I do not see the purpose in attacking both Lookout and Alias in this way.  It would be far better to stick to discussing the evidence in the case.  By all means argue your point of view vigorously, but please avoid personal attacks on those who do not share your viewpoint.

As  a matter of detail Alias has posted that she had not communicated with Jackie.  However, if she has, so what?  Anyone here is free to use the PM facility and noone should be criticised for doing so.

 

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: the hitman
« Reply #230 on: September 17, 2014, 05:18:PM »
Lookout may not care how she comes across but the fact remains she comes across as someone completely ignorant of the actual facts of this case and only posting myths including most recently her bogus claim about one of Sheial's nails being torn off.  Her bias is undeniable.  She even said that Nevill calling police and Jeremy both makes no sense but fater having it explained to her that the call would help establish Jeremy's innocence she changed her stance and says it happened. 

A couple of weeks ago while reading old threads I came across a post where Alias asserted his innocence.  Her recent posting certainly suggests she maintains that position.  In fact she is griping because her pro Jeremy stances have been torn apart and she doesn't like it being proved wrong.  As  a result she has been pouting and communicating with Jackie in private.  That alone reveals her loyalties who would communicate with Jackie unless a staunch Jeremy supporter?

I have seen a large amount of tention here because a number of pro-Jeremy supporters are extremely unhappy that the myths are being peeled away and that they are stuck admitting they have nothing to support their position only bias drives them.

Jackie have I been communicating with you in private?
I have not, wtf is wrong with you?! You are making things up about me out of the blue! I demand you take that back, because it is a blatant lie.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2014, 05:19:PM by Alias »

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Re: the hitman
« Reply #231 on: September 17, 2014, 05:24:PM »
Jackie have I been communicating with you in private?
I have not, wtf is wrong with you?! You are making things up about me out of the blue! I demand you take that back, because it is a blatant lie.

You will see from the post above that I have already challenged Scipio on this Alias.  He should now withdraw his comment.


Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: the hitman
« Reply #232 on: September 17, 2014, 05:26:PM »
You will see from the post above that I have already challenged Scipio on this Alias.  He should now withdraw his comment.

Thank you.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: the hitman
« Reply #233 on: September 17, 2014, 05:37:PM »
Jackie have I been communicating with you in private?
I have not, wtf is wrong with you?! You are making things up about me out of the blue! I demand you take that back, because it is a blatant lie.

Alias

Not once, his posts are ridiculous as usual

As for the numerous comments from other members about me being rude ?
I can't recall me being rude just outspoken??

In fact the owner of the company I work bought me a sign for me desk that says it all

He is in quite a powerful position and right behind me with campaigning for Jeremy
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the hitman
« Reply #234 on: September 17, 2014, 05:49:PM »
Jackie have I been communicating with you in private?
I have not, wtf is wrong with you?! You are making things up about me out of the blue! I demand you take that back, because it is a blatant lie.

I thought that Jackie said that you and her were communicating in PMs about this.  I didn't see any post that NGB is mentioning where Jackie ended up denying such thus was unaware she did so.

Thus I was wrong about you communicating with her.

I also don't know what happened with Harters.  I spent this weekend volunteering for charity and evidently missed some fireworks and still have not been able to piece together what happened.

I returned monday to see several insults exchainged between long time posters and am still trying to play catch up here.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: the hitman
« Reply #235 on: September 17, 2014, 05:59:PM »
Funny how you now keep saying you are on the fence, since Grahame left & Susan, Caroline & April turned. Leaving poor Janus & Lookout on their own.

You were always very pro Jeremy before. Putting me on ignore because I suggested his guilt.

Oi - don't bring me into it. And let me make it clear I am quite happy not being in your gang ;D

And as We explained before you were not put on ignore because you suggested his guilt.




Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: the hitman
« Reply #236 on: September 17, 2014, 06:03:PM »
Alias

Not once, his posts are ridiculous as usual

As for the numerous comments from other members about me being rude ?
I can't recall me being rude just outspoken??

In fact the owner of the company I work bought me a sign for me desk that says it all

He is in quite a powerful position and right behind me with campaigning for Jeremy

It´s a hint, jackie, it´s a hint!  ;)

Neil

  • Guest
Re: the hitman
« Reply #237 on: September 17, 2014, 06:04:PM »
I thought that Jackie said that you and her were communicating in PMs about this.  I didn't see any post that NGB is mentioning where Jackie ended up denying such thus was unaware she did so.

Thus I was wrong about you communicating with her.

I also don't know what happened with Harters.  I spent this weekend volunteering for charity and evidently missed some fireworks and still have not been able to piece together what happened.

I returned monday to see several insults exchainged between long time posters and am still trying to play catch up here.
I hold both Patti and Hartley in the highest regard.  It's a real shame that two of the most clued up, interesting and respectful posters on this forum, have fallen out. 

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: the hitman
« Reply #238 on: September 17, 2014, 06:07:PM »
Jackie I have seen you being rude to Caroline and harters you have stated many times my posts are rubbish which I don't think is very nice but hey ho I can live with it as it is your opinion which you are entitled to.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: the hitman
« Reply #239 on: September 17, 2014, 06:09:PM »
I hold both Patti and Hartley in the highest regard.  It's a real shame that two of the most clued up, interesting and respectful posters on this forum, have fallen out.

me too. Hopefully they can sort it out. We need a balance of people to have a decent  discussion.