Author Topic: Why would he?  (Read 19119 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #105 on: March 26, 2011, 12:48:AM »
I try not to offend.  ;)

And, i'm one of the few on this forum thats broke the law to aid our knowledge..i deserve love.  :)

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #106 on: March 26, 2011, 12:51:AM »
I try not to offend.  ;)

And, i'm one of the few on this forum thats broke the law to aid our knowledge..i deserve love.  :)

hmmm broke the law, tell me more ;)

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #107 on: March 26, 2011, 12:54:AM »
I drove from Witham-WHF at similar speeds to police car answering an emergency call.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #108 on: March 26, 2011, 12:56:AM »
how long did it take you

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #109 on: March 26, 2011, 12:59:AM »
Locals route was 16 minutes, but could have got it down by a few minutes if i had flashing lights. Main road route was about 20, but could have took loads off with flashing lights.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #110 on: March 26, 2011, 01:03:AM »
are the roads around there quiet, being in the countryside and all that?

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #111 on: March 26, 2011, 01:04:AM »
The locals route is, hardly pass a house, but the main road route is built up, so couldn't risk running someone over in Tiptree.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #112 on: March 26, 2011, 01:05:AM »
Locals route was 16 minutes, but could have got it down by a few minutes if i had flashing lights. Main road route was about 20, but could have took loads off with flashing lights.


Okay, I remove your freshman status. Though I think you should try it with a flashing light, in the interests of science: can you not borrow one?

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #113 on: March 26, 2011, 01:08:AM »
I reckon, Witham-WHF can be done in 13 minutes, but that would be standing start with engine running.

I'll ask Witham police for an escort next time.  :)

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #114 on: March 26, 2011, 01:08:AM »
The locals route is, hardly pass a house, but the main road route is built up, so couldn't risk running someone over in Tiptree.


you could have gone jogger squashing...F..K your not a jogger are you  ;)

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #115 on: March 26, 2011, 01:09:AM »
 
The locals route is, hardly pass a house, but the main road route is built up, so couldn't risk running someone over in Tiptree.


you could have gone jogger squashing...F..K your not a jogger are you  ;)

Lol, i get out of breath typing.  ;D

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #116 on: March 26, 2011, 01:10:AM »
The locals route is, hardly pass a house, but the main road route is built up, so couldn't risk running someone over in Tiptree.


you could have gone jogger squashing...F..K your not a jogger are you  ;)

Lol, i get out of breath typing.  ;D


:O)  +1

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #117 on: March 26, 2011, 01:10:AM »
lol same here, im blue in the face as we speak

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #118 on: March 26, 2011, 01:17:AM »
The locals route is, hardly pass a house, but the main road route is built up, so couldn't risk running someone over in Tiptree.


you could have gone jogger squashing...F..K your not a jogger are you  ;)

Lol, i get out of breath typing.  ;D


:O)  +1

Have one back.  ;)

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Why would he?
« Reply #119 on: March 26, 2011, 10:03:AM »
Out of interest, have you actually read anything about lie detectors?

Some.  Not loads.  I've read that testers allege accuracy rates in the region of 90% + but that studies have revealed accuracy rates could dip as low as 60% +.

IMO.. where a person is accused of something (not necessarily a serious crime, it could be an everyday life matter which they deem to be of some gravity) and is pleading their innocence in relation to the accusation... those are the kind of situations where a person might verbally 'offer to take a lie detector test'.  Their offer is effectively a plea of cast iron certainty in their own innocence.  Now in everyday life, it could also be a bluff (because it is highly unlikely that the person will actually undergo such a test). 

Just an observation IMO, that it may well be an attempt to 'prove' innocence, despite the legal impotence attached to such tests.