Well if you insist on reassessing and giving YOUR evaluation of everything, that happens to others, to suit your own view point, I guess the whole history of the world would be quite different.......................but I'm forgetting myself, you've already done it. You've rewritten history, haven't you?
I would remind you that there are numerous ways of attacking. You seem to have mastered the art of one of them rather competently yourself.
Everytime a Bamber supporter is shown to have a baseless position the tears and feigning indignities come out to try to change the subject.
Frankly after the the lies and misconceptions by Jeremy supporters I wonder whether this supposed witness statement even exists. No name is ever mentioned for him quite curiously which one would want to include if they actually read it as claimed:
"The witness statement of an Electric Board official who went to White House Farm to read the electric metre two days before the shootings is revealing. The man had an arrangement with the Bambers where he could get the key and let himself in to read the meter. On this particular occasion, the official was confronted by Sheila inside the farmhouse; she screamed and shouted abuse at him. The man was terrified and ‘feared for his life’ and was grateful when June appeared, calmed Sheila down and took her away. June commented that Sheila hadn’t been taking her medication and wasn’t well. The Electric Board official made a witness statement to the police, but this statement was never passed on to Jeremy’s defence team."
If we assume this actually happened all it demostrates is the guy knew where the key was because he routinely unlocked the door with it to let himself in to read the meter. The account describes it as a longstanding arrangment not something new. Sheila would be aware of this arrangement why? He let himself in, she saw a stranger who entered unannounced and she screamed at it to get out.
Did she physically assault him? No If she had assualted him to chase him out would such have been indicative of her having delusions again and being violent during delusions? No
To any rational person is is perfectly understnadable and acceptable to chase a stranger from your house and property. She didn't go get a gun to chase him or any other weapon so it is not something that can be used to try to refute claims she woudl no touch guns and had no interest. If it happened it is not of any use at all unless one is dishonest and tries to spin it as Jeremy supporters do out of desperation because they have no actual evidence of her having delusions after being released from the hospital in March or any violence during the any psychotic episodes. Since there was no such evidence supporters scan through everything trying to see what they could twist to try to pretend there is evidence and this is basically the only episode they can try to spin.
Supporters look dishonest and pathetic trying to pretend this (if it actually happened) supports the view she was relapsing and violent.
Just as pathetic and dishonest when asserting Sheila would have changed her clothing before killing herself and the clothes in the bucket are evidence of this and that is why her clothign had no GSR or blood though such clothing was only for her lower half and the blood and GSR would have mainly been on the clothing on her upper half and no such clothing she could have changed out of was found.
You voluntarily have decided to wage an agenda in support of Jeremy as opposed to following the evidence objectively. You do so despite the complete lack of evidence to use to support your position. That is your choice. The fact you have no evidence to support your position doesn't give you licencse to spin things and then not be called on it.
So if you have a problem with being challenged then don't post nonsense claims and distortions it is that simple.
