0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What a disgrace. Anyone else spouting this shit would be met with the correct condemnation by all members of the forum. You seem to have a free pass to post unsubstantiated hate.
I don't particularly care what YOU think about my post. On the contrary,there is NO hate in what I posted,,and the simple reason why you say what you do is that June was never a suspect,or was she ? Yes,,she actually was before Sheila became one,and if you followed the case instead of my bloody posts you might just learn something !
I don't care if you agree Maggie, I wasn't asking you to agree. There is no evidence that points anywhere near June having anything to do with this crime - so it's unsubstantiated hate to say that June had anything to do with it, unless you're able to point me in the direction of evidence that says otherwise?
I think you may find that I have stood up and argued in favour of June more than most on this forum and paid quite a price for it but I cannot see why Lookout's post deserved being labelled as 'unsubstantiated hate'. Unsubstantiated yes but not really hate imo.I don't believe for a minute you were asking me to agree or that you care what I think but I was just pointing out once again that you attack Lookout at any opportunity and for no apparent reason.
I don´t agree with lookout on this and have said so. Can´t keep saying it every time she airs her theory!
I'm pretty sure it can be classed as hateful to accuse an innocent dead person of these crimes, it's vulgar to do so.I'm not attacking Lookout for no reason - I'm attacking her post and I said why - unsubstantiated and hateful - goes against all evidence. Even Bamber would condemn it.That's True, Alias.
If it was an argument between June and Sheila I could understand Neville trying to wade in and break it up - but it would not explain why those two boys were shot. Not at all. Also where would the "suicide" come into the scenario.?Also why none of her prints on the gun?
I don't for one moment agree with Lookout's view and see nothing to suggest there is even a remote possibility of things happening that way. But I don't see how it's hateful, it's just her opinion. I have to admit that I find it uncomfortable to read BUT it is a discussion board about the case and as mods we can't tell people what to think.
Nor would it explain Nevill phoning and claiming Sheila had the gun and had gone crazy if June were the one with the gun. If one wants to pretend the fiction that Nevill did call Jeremy then one has to stand by the claim made that Sheila was the one running around mad with the gun.
there were times in Jeremys interview where he did say that he thought his father perhaps had said "she" rather than Sheila - but the call was quick and he was not 100% sure . But I still don't know why the police would implicate June - or was that just the press? And can not see for one moment why the twins would be involved.