Did Jeremy have the 'opportunity' to commit the massacre ?

[Adam]

Just as important as forensic and circumstantial evidence is whether the accused had the opportunity to commit the crime.

A defence that can show there was no or a limited opportunity could put reasonable doubt into the jury.

The prosecution argued Jeremy committed the massacre for money. Did he have the 'opportunity' to achieve his aim ?

INSIDE WHF. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Was everyone connected to the will in one place ? Yes.

Was everyone likely to be asleep ? Yes.

Were 4/5 of the people physically weaker than Jeremy ? Yes.

Was there a deadly weapon available ? Yes.


GETTING TO WHF. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Was it close enough ? Yes.

Were there different routes there ? Yes.

Was there a way there without being seen ? Yes.

Were there several transport options ? Yes.


ENTRY INTO AND OUT OF WHF. WAS THERE AN OPPORTINITY ?

Was there a quiet way in ? Yes.

Was there a way to lock a window from outside ? Yes.


THE TIME LIMITS. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Jeremy was left to his own devices between 10.30pm - 3.00am. Was that enough time ? Yes.

Are there any witnesses that saw or spoke to Jeremy between the above times ? No.


DIVERTING THE BLAME. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Was there a scapegoat ? Yes.


Jeremy certainly had the 'opportunity' to commit the massacre. Of that we must all agree.

[nugnug]

all depends what time it was comited theres no definite answer to that.

[Jan]

Just as important as forensic and circumstantial evidence is whether the accused had the opportunity to commit the crime.

A defence that can show there was no or a limited opportunity could put reasonable doubt into the jury.

The prosecution argued Jeremy committed the massacre for money. Did he have the 'opportunity' to achieve his aim ?

INSIDE WHF. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Was everyone connected to the will in one place ? Yes.

Was everyone likely to be asleep ? Yes.

Were 4/5 of the people physically weaker than Jeremy ? Yes.

Was there a deadly weapon available ? Yes.


GETTING TO WHF. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Was it close enough ? Yes.

Were there different routes there ? Yes.

Was there a way there without being seen ? Yes.

Were there several transport options ? Yes.


ENTRY INTO AND OUT OF WHF. WAS THERE AN OPPORTINITY ?

Was there a quiet way in ? Yes.

Was there a way to lock a window from outside ? Yes.


THE TIME LIMITS. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Jeremy was left to his own devices between 10.30pm - 3.00am. Was that enough time ? Yes.

Are there any witnesses that saw or spoke to Jeremy between the above times ? No.


DIVERTING THE BLAME. WAS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY ?

Was there a scapegoat ? Yes.


Jeremy certainly had the 'opportunity' to commit the massacre. Of that we must all agree.

so did Sheila - so you are back to square one- glad you have so much time on your hands.

 - and yet again I repeat - the police did not manage to lock a window from the outside - so NOT proven your supposition on this point is again hearsay.

[grahameb]

It appears Adam that you have answered all your own questions? So no need for me to answer any.

[maggie]

so did Sheila - so you are back to square one- glad you have so much time on your hands.

 - and yet again I repeat - the police did not manage to lock a window from the outside - so NOT proven your supposition on this point is again hearsay.

Hi jansus I agree, am sick of Adam saying that thw window could be locked from the outside, it's not true, the police admitted after the trial that the windows could not be locked from the outside.

[lookout]

 I don't know what Adams' motive is,,but his repetitive posts tell me that it's someone on a mission of some sort,as he's posting for postings' sake. We've heard it all before.

What's your aim,Adam ? Because clearly,you have NO interest in the case at all.

[susan]

Hello lookout  Adam uses the forum as a platform to be heard maybe he should become a preacher and have his own flock

[lookout]

 Hi Susan,,a soapbox would suffice, under a small tree in a small corner tucked away in Hyde Park.

[susan]

Ha Ha lookout should he dress for the occasion

[lookout]

 Yes,Susan--------a dress would be appropriate 

[Jan]

Hi Susan,,a soapbox would suffice, under a small tree in a small corner tucked away in Hyde Park.

Well he certainly thinks he is king of the Threads- obviously trying to break some sort of record.

Bless.

[lookout]

 He,,with a lot of others,won't be smirking and posting their self-satisfying posts when the truth comes out.
While Jeremys' account of the night of the 7th has NEVER faltered,,others have had their statements altered,edited and re-thought about in many instances. So it would seem that Jeremy has told the truth !

It must have rattled EP during his interrogation,,until late at night,for days,that Jeremy gave the same answers each time.

 

[susan]

Ha Ha lookout I like it can just imagine it where is he anyway gathering info for more threads

[lookout]

 His ID should be Spider-----------because he does a lot of spinning. His posts are full of it.

[Alias]

Hello lookout  Adam uses the forum as a platform to be heard maybe he should become a preacher and have his own flock

At Sunday service, he would just say, Sermon already made. It is the same sermon as last Sunday´s. Remember to read up on the 19 Commandments. Source Please. Amen

And don´t forget to say your "five sources" twenty times every day, now, bugger off, peeps.

He would quickly lose his "flock", eh!