Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 1055655 times)

0 Members and 33 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Challenge accepted, give me a minute to read everything.

ill be reading them as well.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
There was no blood DNA sample. Ask Sandra to provide her source for this.

gordo allready knows the source.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710

 :o

are you indulging your sezual fantasys agian.

Offline marty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 463
I like how JF "hacked off all of his hair!" rather simply "just had a haircut"

You should be a journalist, Sandra.

Was he known to cut his own hair?
As far as the community being happy the right person has been caught. I know numerous people from the community and a fair few think the opposite to be fair.
As far as the dog is concerned, Luke's dog was never over the v, seven spaniels were.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Do you have a source confirming that he cut his own hair on this occasion?

Ferris himself, in his statements to police. Other family members in their statements.

Quote
Not sure what point you're trying to make about the dog. My point is that Mia apparently lead Luke to the body just by passing the V in the wall, despite having already passed it on the way up. How do you explain that inconsistency?

Yes, firstly, JaJ and SK both said the dog started jumping about at the wall, just past the V point, standing on her hind legs, scrabbling at the wall and noticeably sniffing. The first inconsistency is that, by the time of the trial, they'd forgotten seeing that (even though they remembered seeing it for a whole month after the murder.)

The dog may very well have reacted on the way up - by Luke's own admission, she was "highly excited" but he would have just pulled her away from the wall - his mission was to get up the path and to Judith's house. At that stage, he was only looking for Jodi on the path itself - he was 14, his girlfriend was missing, and he was on a secluded path in the dark. He also believed JuJ was waiting for him at the other end, with or without Jodi. The dog was not "working" at that stage - she had been given no working commands, and Luke was not looking for "alerts" from her.

Secondly, he could not possibly have known they would want to double check the path, yet when it was suggested, he didn't try to avoid it, he actually asked if anyone had anything of Jodi's so the dog could get a scent from it. AW said she would have "gone back" for something of Jodi's, but it was "too far." The entrance to the path was a 2 minute 40 second walk from Jodi's home - SK or Luke could have sprinted round and back in a few minutes to get something of Jodi's.

Thirdly, if we're talking inconsistencies, JaJ stated in court that the one and only place the family search trio had any intention of looking was the path itself - they didn't look anywhere on the way there, and had no intention of carrying on towards Newbattle if Jodi wasn't on the path. Yet all of the evidence shows the information they had was that Jodi was going to be "mucking about up here" - up here being Mayfield/Easthouses - they should have had no reason whatsoever to head straight for the path. Having gone there, it made no sense for them not to "double check" the Newbattle Road as well, if Jodi was not on the path - after all there are dozens of places a young girl could have been snatched off the pavement into woodland on the Newbattle Road.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Quote
Quote
But how could anyone have known at that point which direction Jodi took that night? She wasn't believed to be going to Luke's house

Yes she was. Even Luke was at home waiting on her, or was he not?! Oops. 


The search trio had no reason to believe she was going to Newbattle. Judith insisted she was not going to Newbattle. The only person who did know she was going to Newbattle was Luke himself,

Quote
Quote
why did they consider looking at the path at all?


Why did Luke? He brought a torch/sniffer dog and everything...

They had no reason to. Luke was going up the path Jodi would have used to come to Newbattle - the very place here entire family believed she was not going to be.

Quote
Quote
Jodi's mother also told police that sometimes, when they were hanging around "up here" they went to Scotts caravans. The search trio also walked straight past there without looking.


Considering she had just spoken to Luke on the phone who confirmed he wasn't with Jodi, it would be obvious she wasn't at Scotts Caravans with him. Don't let that obvious explanation get in the way of attempting to making Judy sound guilty (of God knows what) though.

Nope, wrong again. The search trio was told Jodi had not been with Luke, but that they were expected to have been mucking about "up here." Since she'd failed to meet up with Luke five to five and a half hours earlier, it would surely have made sense to have checked the places she might have headed for, in case something had happened to her along the way which prevented her from meeting Luke? Nobody's trying to make Judy "look guilty" of anything - the truth is simply the truth.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Quote
Quote
The sighting/description of the girl and the youth given by AB is not credible and, in my opinion, the mistaken description of clothes, etc, coupled with the early pictures of Jodi aged five and eight, seriously hampered the search for witnesses who may have seen Jodi.

Why is it not credible? Who did AB see and why have they disappeared off the face of the Earth?

All of the other evidence! Wrong descriptions, wrong times, claims that it was her husband who saw a youth (no female), failure to identify Luke, failure to identify the parka jacket... there's a mountain of evidence demonstrating that this sighting was not credible. Oh yes, and as for disappearing off the face of the earth, none of the 10 witnesses known to be on the path saw them.


Quote
Quote
A lot depends on the time she actually left her home. If it was much earlier than 5pm (and there is some evidence that this may, in fact, have been the case

I would love to see what evidence you have of that. Please.

Judith's early statements about Jodi coming in from school, trying to talk to her mum, and Judith telling her to "be quiet, shoo and go out." Judith herself suggested in some statements that this was as early as 4.30pm


Quote
Quote
What reason could there have been for her mother apparently trying to keep her quiet and get her out of the house so soon after arriving, especially since Jodi was supposed to be grounded?)

You tell us. Don't make accusations and expect us to answer them for you.

That's a question, not an accusation.

Quote
Quote
The road on which Jodi was walking is a fairly busy road - from there she could have taken the Mayfield route I described earlier, or walked towards Newtongrange (but there is nothing to suggest she had any connection with/reason to go to Newtongrange.) This route could also have taken her on a circuitous route either to Mayfield or Newtongrange, but that's about it - it's not a route that gives access to a large number of places

There's absolutely no evidence to suggest she did any of this, but hey lets give this priority over the independent sightings.

Because nobody bothered to look for any evidence that she did. I already said there was no reason for her to go to Newtongrange, but she could have headed for Mayfield - the "independent sightings" do not preclude this.

Quote
Quote
ver made public, and never, to my knowledge, followed up by police investigators. It was discovered by the SCCRC investigation, almost 10 years later,  that one of the witnesses to Stocky Man on the day of the murder saw a person on TV on the day of Jodi's funeral, and recognised him as the man she'd seen following Jodi. She returned to the police with this information, but no further action was taken on her up-dated statement.

So why wasn't this mentioned in the SCCRC submission?

Oh dear, It was discovered by the SCCRC investigation, almost 10 years later, - the SCCRC found it.

Quote
Quote
jodie could of died at more or less anytime bettween her last being seenn and the body being found.

Yes thanks for that nugnug, I think we can all agree that Jodi died between her last sighting and the discovery of her body.

I think nugnug was making reference to the claimed 5.15pm time of death not necessarily being reliable, since there was zero evidence for that being the time she died.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Quote
Quote
One big problem with a prolonged attack is th lack  of noise, Jodi fought her attacker and fought for her life wouldn't she have screamed for it also! The lack of any credible witnesses to noise from any area that night is really strange, if the crime was later than 5:15 were getting to the time when dog owners were taking their dogs for their last evening walk someone had to have heard something

Likewise wouldn't she be screaming if she was being stalked/pursued through the woods as Sandra suggests?

Unless of course she was over there with someone she knew, by choice.

Ah! Something on which we can agree. The question then would have to be, who would that someone be? There were two people known to her, at the V point, at the exact time it was claimed she was murdered. There are witnesses to this, both people admit they were there and both people lied to try to cover up the fact that they were there. Neither of them was Luke.


Quote
Quote
As we know, hardly a single word of JaF's statement can be believed - we know it was his condom and that's about it. But interestingly, he claimed it was getting "grey dark" and he thought it was about 9 - 9.30. It didn't start getting dark until around 10.30 that evening, but even if he was mistaken about the level of darkness, what can we make of the time? Another mistake? An outright lie? Or the truth, in which case, either he did, in fact, step over Jodi's body, or she wasn't there.

He wouldn't have had to "step over Jodi's body", why do you keep saying this? It's an insult to the intelligence of anybody who has ever seen the crime scene. Why can't he have just walked past/been near it? In reality, he would have no reason to step as close to the wall as where Jodi lay.

Anyone who has seen the crime scene knows you have just blatantly tried to mislead people. The pathway behind the wall, from the V point, runs along the front of the wall. Jodi's body was lying out from the wall with her feet closest to the path. Unless he was scrambling through bushes, this was the only route (the one he, himself, claimed to have taken) by which he could reach the point he said he reached before turning back after doing what he did.

Quote
Quote
i find it hard to belive that the spaneils wouldent of sniffed out the body but that goes on the assumption that there was a body there at the time.

But you don't find it hard to believe Luke's dog never sniffed out the body when they walked directly past it on the way up the path... Different story on the way back though in front of the search party. That's what I find hard to believe.


The spaniels were behind the wall, in the woodland strip, not on leads. I've already explained that the dog may have reacted on the way up, that reaction being perceived as her being "excitable." The official line is that Luke went to extraordinary lengths to "cover up" then led the family directly to the body - isn't that kind of hard to believe?

Quote
Quote
That's just half an hour before JF was supposed to return to JoJ's house to smoke cannabis with him, but somehow, he forgot to go

Or simply changed hid mind? But hey don't let a chance to point suspicion at anyone but Luke go to waste. Luke's family can completely forget seeing him in the house and being served dinner by him but that's fine I suppose.

Or simply changed his mind, except, that's not the reason he gave. Luke's mother never "forgot" seeing him, Shane could not remember if he'd seen Luke or not, initially - not quite the same thing, is it? Again, no pointing fingers of suspicion, just the facts.

Quote
Quote
is there anyone out there who still believes jodi was on that path and the crime being committed at this time......

Yes. Nobody heard any struggle because she was over there with her boyfriend...

Who left not a trace of himself on her, at the crime scene, or anywhere along the "escape route," in his home, anywhere.


Quote
Quote
Hi sandra

I know it's a bit off topic, I'm really interested in what's being g posted at the moment but do you know what the general feeling g regarding luke and his guilt or innocence is within the local community now.?

Surely there is doubt and if so is it spoken about at all.

There isn't. The only people who believe Luke is isn't is the small few you'll see posting on forums like this.  The local community is comfortable that the right person is behind bars, supported by the complete absense of any other similar attacks since Luke's incarceration.


Interesting claim. I guess we'll just have to agree to differ (another point of agreement!)

Quote
Quote
Why is every item contaminated by singular sperm cells!! we can produce up to 200 million in one ejaculaton so why just singular ones dotted around every item of clothing apart from the hoodie?

Because this reinforces the fact that innocent transfer explanation is by far the most likely. Nobody ejaculated at the murder scene.

It reinforces the fact that transfer is a plausible explanation, not "innocent" transfer. I suppose JaF filled that condom by transferring drop by drop, did he? No-one has ever tried to suggest anyone ejaculated on Jodi or on her clothing.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2017, 04:00:PM by sandra L »

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
I like how JF "hacked off all of his hair!" rather simply "just had a haircut"

You should be a journalist, Sandra.

Just had a haircut which he did by himself so neatly and professionally that he had to get a barber to fix it because he made such a mess of it. That better?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
he was in rather a hurry to have it cut.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Couldn't wait for an appointment at the barber's apparently!

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i can only he must of got somthing in his hair that couldentbe easly washed out.


Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
haha

like what

or he could somone gave him a diy hair cut laugh.

or could posbly of taking some ilcit subsantance and thought it might be a good idea to hack his own hair off.

somties people do.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
hahah like glue :))

could of been good thinking.