The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[marty]

He could have changed his clothes after the murders though. Experts testified the killer had a good chance of getting her blood on his clothing and if Mitchell did then he must have thrown them out.  It is believed he did so which is why the DNA on the pants wasn't played up more plus it could have come from innocent contamination.  Finding blood on his clothing would have been far more damning.

Experts testified that he would have to have had some sort of coveralls,hat,goggles,gloves on for no trace to be left on him but he said it was not impossible.

[nugnug]

when he was qustioned his hair and fingernails were dirty so he hadent washed.

[marty]

Exactly nugnug, so his hair and everything else must have been covered then. So when he was seen by so called witnesses,did they see him dressed in all this gear or carrying a bag/rucksack whatever.

[scipio_usmc]

Experts testified that he would have to have had some sort of coveralls,hat,goggles,gloves on for no trace to be left on him but he said it was not impossible.

Mitchell had enough time to dispose of the clothing he wore.  If the clothing had blood on it then surely he would have gotten rid of it. 

[marty]

Where,then 11inch in diameter log burner

[nugnug]

Exactly nugnug, so his hair and everything else must have been covered then. So when he was seen by so called witnesses,did they see him dressed in all this gear or carrying a bag/rucksack whatever.

no they certanly did not .

[nugnug]

Mitchell had enough time to dispose of the clothing he wore.  If the clothing had blood on it then surely he would have gotten rid of it.

but he hadent had dirty figngernails and dirty hair when examend witch would indicate he hadent washed and changed.

if the proscutions timing is correct he hardly had any time to to change his clothes.

[marty]

I read it on the wap forum.it was discussed at length. There was also diagrams of the t shirt and where the various samples were found. And as far as I am aware everything on the wap forum was verified from the case papers by sandra lean. Alas, since she is not power of attorney anymore it was all taken down. I'm sure it was on Luke's website under other suspects as well. Alas, it has all been taken down also.
I'm sure nugnug would have seen that.

[nugnug]

it is also in the gaurdion i belive and i belive it has been posted here but ill have to go check.

[Stephanie]

I read it on the wap forum.it was discussed at length. There was also diagrams of the t shirt and where the various samples were found. And as far as I am aware everything on the wap forum was verified from the case papers by sandra lean. Alas, since she is not power of attorney anymore it was all taken down. I'm sure it was on Luke's website under other suspects as well. Alas, it has all been taken down also.
I'm sure nugnug would have seen that.

Why would 'power of attorney' affect information on a website? Doesn't make sense? Could there be another reason for this?

[marty]

Pwahahahaha

[Stephanie]

Pwahahahaha

By your laughter, are you suggesting Mr Middleton is being disingenuous about the power of attorney claim?

[David1819]

What is going on with this case? can someone please give me a dummies introduction?

[nugnug]

heres a basic outline i will post more later.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jodi_Jones

[marty]

No. There's zero happening that's all