Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 730278 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16861
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
ok then

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16861
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710


i have to wonder why you would so desprate to look a sccrc submission.

were you frightend you would be mentioned in it by any chance.

Neil

  • Guest
How is Lithium related to this case?

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16861
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i dont know but if you read all his posts he certanly is.


Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148

guest154

  • Guest
No shock.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16861
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48611
 It doesn't look too promising.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16861
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
on the face of it but theres more to come yet.

Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
What part was not a shock mat? I have to agree with you though as I didn't think it was going to go our way either. The trouble is that the way Lukes trial went based completely on circumstantial evidence then it was always going to be hard. In most cases of MoJ's its concrete evidence,witness testimony or procedural manipulations that get the verdict over turned and of course there were none of those in this case anyway.

On the other hand we have an independent body having done part of the police's job in investigating and came up with more evidence that could if it had been available gone a very long way to finding Luke innocent, the fact that it may lead to another suspect is not what the SCCRC are there fore so again not a surprise.

guest154

  • Guest
Hi Gordo.

I don't think it's a shock that the SCCRC rejected - although I didn't think that this information was to be released until Monday 14th July, so I was shocked to read about it already - don't suppose you know who/where this was openly spoken about first?

Also - not shocked about SL's apparent actions (If what Michaela says is true) as it's not the first time she's cut all contact off with the people she's meant to be working with.

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148

I don't know what is going on within the Wrongly Accused Person people. I just posted the link after reading it.  Gordo might know more about what is going on behind the scenes.

Offline Michaela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Hi Gordo.

I don't think it's a shock that the SCCRC rejected - although I didn't think that this information was to be released until Monday 14th July, so I was shocked to read about it already - don't suppose you know who/where this was openly spoken about first?

Also - not shocked about SL's apparent actions (If what Michaela says is true) as it's not the first time she's cut all contact off with the people she's meant to be working with.

The Mail on Sunday ran an article about it. Its on WAP site.  Other newspapers followed suit.

Offline gordo30

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
Mat.

What made you think that the information was going to be released on that specific date? let alone when the information was even going to be pasted to Luke?

SL's actions are indicative to her, Luke's case will be placed in the hands of those more apt to deal with it.

guest154

  • Guest
Mat.

What made you think that the information was going to be released on that specific date? let alone when the information was even going to be pasted to Luke?



That's just the date I'd heard, Gordo - can't really say much more than that.

As for SL - has there been any news you can report? I heard Lukes family have been banned off the other forum/unable to get any contact with SL?