The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[nugnug]

no they dont john ferris and gordon dickie dont  david dickie dont james falconer dont joseph jones dont.

no albis whatsoever.

steven kelly has one but its starting to look shaky.

[Janet]

read the beginning of the thread it wasn't me who started all the personal stuff

I'm the one asked to justify every opinion i hold on the case.

and your the one who keeps saying facts you dont like are outrageous

the "facts" as you call the claims about members of the Jones family and others for that matter are not facts at all. That is what I find outrageous. All there is, is total speculation about who else could have, might have or maybe have murdered Jodi Jones.

The fact is that these people have not been charged and convicted. Luke Mitchell has and it is totally outrageous to blame the victims family of murder or covering a murder up, or the multitude of other things that have been said about this family. They have suffered enough.

half the stuff being said about the family was already mentioned in the trial so sorry it is fact.

yes there is a lot of speculation thats what happens on public forums.

just like its happening with the bamber case.

I have never seen any of the "facts" about the Jones family in the newspaper. Even if half of it was mentioned in court where did the other half come from? And obviously whatever was heard in court was dismissed out of hand.

I am not interested in speculation in any of these cases and neither are the courts.

There is speculation and then there is trying to re write history the way you would prefer it. 

Speculation will get no one anywhere fast. In fact I would say it was a hinderance.

[nugnug]

you must be a bit interested or you wouldn't bother to read it

im afraid is not going to stop anytime soon.

[Janet]

no they dont john ferris and gordon dickie dont  david dickie dont james falconer dont joseph jones dont.

no albis whatsoever.

steven kelly has one but its starting to look shaky.

Mr Findlay told the appeal court that "as a result of investigations" he was no longer pursuing an interest in Mr Falconer.
http://news.scotsman.com/jodijonesmurder/Mitchell-legal-team-drops-interest.3776020.jp

Mark Kane as you stated yourself yesterday could not have been scratched by Jodi so he is ruled out.
Steven Kelly's alibi shaky? He was with Janine and his father,that has been accepted.
Joseph Jones was at home. Also accepted.
And whatever the others said was also accepted too.

[Janet]

you must be a bit interested or you wouldn't bother to read it

im afraid is not going to stop anytime soon.

I am sure it is not going to stop anytime soon. Speculation will never be fact and causes more damage so go ahead speculate all you like. It does nothing for Luke Mitchell's chances but what the hell

[nugnug]

well we shall see shant we.

as you think hes guilty why would you care about his chances.

[Janet]

well we shall see shant we.

as you think hes guilty why would you care about his chances.

yes we shall see.

I don't particularly care about his chances. I do care about what is being said publicly about a grieving family due to speculation on people who have never been charged with anything to do with this murder.

[nugnug]

joseph jones was never interviewed.

james falconer john ferris gordon dickie and david dickie were at the murder scene by there own admission

falconer dident come forward for 3 years dispite appeals by the police for the owners of the condom to come forward.

ferris and dickie did not come for a week dispite appeals for them to do so none have any albi

mark kane im convinced has nothing to do with this.

[Janet]

joseph jones was never interviewed.

james falconer john ferris gordon dickie and david dickie were at the murder scene by there own admission

falconer dident come forward for 3 years dispite appeals by the police for the owners of the condom to come forward.

ferris and dickie did not come for a week dispite appeals for them to do so none have any albi

mark kane im convinced has nothing to do with this.

Mr Findlay told the appeal court that "as a result of investigations" he was no longer pursuing an interest in Mr Falconer.
http://news.scotsman.com/jodijonesmurder/Mitchell-legal-team-drops-interest.3776020.jp

Don't you mean these people where near the murder scene around the time of the murder, not at it? There is a difference. None of them have admitted to seeing anything to do with a murder have they?

How do you know who was not spoken to by the police?
where do you get your information from?

[nugnug]

Joesph was not spoken to by the police that's why nothing he said has ever been mentioned because he wasn't interviewed.

so he dident say anything becouse he wasnt asked.

[Janet]

Joesph was not spoken to by the police that's why nothing he said has ever been mentioned because he wasn't interviewed.

so he dident say anything becouse he wasnt asked.

How do you know for 100% certainty that he was not spoken to by the police? You cannot have seen all the police statements made to know this.

 Did you go to the trial?

[nugnug]

if he was no doubt what he said would have been mentioned.

we do you think everyone who says something you don't like has to explain themselves

what everyone else said has been mentioned.

no i never went anywhere near the trial


did you.

[Janet]

if he was no doubt what he said would have been mentioned.

we do you think everyone who says something you don't like has to explain themselves

what everyone else said has been mentioned.

It would not have been mentioned if he had been ruled out. Considering what had just happened to this family the police would not want to upset them any more than they had to.

You are the only Luke Mitchell supporter here, why is that? Are you the Luke Mitchell Spokesperson?
It is nothing to do with not liking what you are saying. Do you expect me just to take your word on the evidence? You have not seen all the police statements. You are making a claim that you cannot be one hundred per cent certain of, yet I have to believe what you tell me?

If there was proof I could see for myself then I would believe it but there is not proof.

[Janet]

No I did not go to the trial. Just like you I have followed this case since it happened.

[nugnug]

i really dont care what you believe

believe what ever you like i believe someting else

and im going to say what believe end of

im just a poster on a forumfor christ sake im  not spokes person for anybody.

im just saying what i think.