The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[susan]

I am winding you up Maggie May I work in Poundland.  Now off to the gym.

[MaggieMay]

That was quite cruel Susan. The prospect of Susan being sexually violated was quite distressing to me. Do poundland pay you a good wage ? OR does everyone on Jeremy Bamber Forum indulge in lies. Well Susan, I can now offer you a probationary period of three months as my P.A

[Jan]

Jansus are you ok yah ? Ya gone awfully awfully quiet Jansus

sorry don't understand your comment , What is the Scheme?

[Jan]

The Scheme is a documentary about a Glasgae housing estate where u live in one of em  tenenants

sorry your grammar deteriorated a bit there - or is that text speak?

Not me - other end of the country .

[Jan]

and according to the fellows at the University you are forced to share toiletries in the back gardens. I would lodge a complaint to my Member of Parliament if I and my husband Davies were ever in such a horrendous situation. There must surely be laws protecting you against such utter violations

think we need to get back to the thread. Especially as you last few posts make absolutely no sense to me.

[MaggieMay]

You really do need to catch up Janus. Now, lets get back to the topic

[MaggieMay]

The Scheme is a valid documentary made by the award winning filmmaker who compares your predicament to the other channel five documentary named "Benefits Street"

[Caroline]

They are rather quite distinct Susan. Separate Laws from very different proclamations. Why do you feel the need to pole dance Susan ? I assume you pole dance in the nude, which is most degrading  to women. Surely their must be another option available to you Susan?

I'm quite relieved that Special Constable Caroline has not appeared to dictate what we can and can not say.

Idiot!

[Neil]

Idiot!

Never a good idea to rise to the bait, it only encourages him!

[nugnug]

maybe we will get back on topic now though actully i dont hold out much hope.

[Jan]

yes - I had a question about wondering how good the forensic evidence would be as it appears the body was not covered? Or is it just they had some evidence of other DNA , but it was just not made clear in court that it existed?

Do you think there was a particular reason that the boyfriend was targeted as the murderer even though there were obviously other people in the vicinity during the period of time in question - or was he just an easy target?

A cover up because the evidence was not protected from the elements?

[nugnug]

to be honest im undecided as to why they picked luke.

though the body was left out for a long time in the rain there were still dna profiles found on the clothes there actually several different dna profiles one was linked to the victems sisters boyfriend. the others are as yet unknown but none of them match luke.

[Jan]

to be honest im undecided as to why they picked luke.

though the body was left out for a long time in the rain there were still dna profiles found on the clothes there actually several different dna profiles one was linked to the victems sisters boyfriend. the others are as yet unknown but none of them match luke.

thank you NugNug. Seems like they had to make him appear as a "monster" to get a conviction - and say his perfectly innocent phone calls were part of the plan. Ring any bells with another case?

[nugnug]

yes i certainly think there's a parallel.

[Lithium]

The Scheme isn't in Glasgow.