The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[nugnug]

i wouldn't have a clue what the sccrc are doing.

and nor would you.

[John]

i wouldn't have a clue what the sccrc are doing.

and nor would you.

Speak for yourself nuggy but I have contacts in the right places.  I was right about the latest appeal and I will be right about the CCRC referral.

[nugnug]

well if thats true then somebodys breaking the law by telling you and this will have to be investgated further.

that couldeven be grounds for a full investigation itself.

it could even be used as new grounds for appeall.

[John]

Stephanie sends her regards missy!   

[nugnug]

if you have obtianed any information about a confidetial ccrc review.

then you have a comited a very serious crime one of course i will  feel compelled to report.

[John]

Aye nuggy and the moon is made of cheese.   

[nugnug]

no i meant it john if i was somebody who believed a word you said i would report it.

[nugnug]

updates.

http://mycrimesforum.myfastforum.org/forum4.php

[wichfinder]

oh his guilty.

[John]

It does appear so in as much as his own brother and mother couldn't get their stories straight in relation to what was at the end of the day a very simple issue.  Liars are always caught out in the end!

[nugnug]

yes that's why were caught out john.

unlike yourself Shane and Corine arnt convicted liars

[John]

That sounds good coming from a coward who hides behind a false identity.

Shane had to tell the truth when faced with a charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice.  In doing so he dropped little bro and big momma right in it.

The guilty verdict against killer Luke renders Corinne a liar by implication, she was very lucky to have the charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice taken no further during the trial. One must bear in mind however that there is no reason why such a charge cannot still be reinstated when the application to the SCCRC fails so she had better watch out. 

That applies to you too nugget since the defamations made publicly by you and others against certain members of the justiciary and former senior police officers have a habit of coming back to haunt.   

[nugnug]

sory a man convicted of  robing old ladys old ladys is in know position somone else a liar

fact they were not convicted of lying unlike yourself.

and your in no postion to call anyone a coward seeing as your hideing away in spain.

you havent even got the bollocks to be in the same country as the people your slaging off.

[nugnug]

ive challenged these people to sue sevral none of them have aint that funny

i welcome all law suits that come my way.

everything ive said about this senoir policeman can back up by fact so if hes reading this i say bring it on.

frontline and rough justice have allready said this he hasnt dared to sue them.

[John]

sory a man convicted of  robing old ladys old ladys is in know position somone else a liar

fact they were not convicted of lying unlike yourself.

and your in no postion to call anyone a coward seeing as your hideing away in spain.

you havent even got the bollocks to be in the same country as the people your slaging off.

Maybe you should get your facts straight yet again imbecile penguin.  I have never been convicted of robbing anyone let alone any old ladies.  As for being convicted of lying, I have never faced a charge of perjury not like the Mitchell's who were both charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice and were warned in relation to a charge of perjury.

You don't know where I live idiot so quit while you are ahead as you are beginning to look stupid now!   

As for suing you, I believe it is only a matter of time before you receive a writ.  The archives relating to you and your defamations are quite interesting and should make for excellent reading on my new forum.