Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 1055426 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
i have know idea and i dont see what its got to do with the murder anyway.

its completly unrelated.

John

  • Guest
i have know idea and i dont see what its got to do with the murder anyway.

its completly unrelated.

It's to do with Corinne's credibility isn't it as a witness.  She has already been proven a liar in court so it will be interesting to see what she says in the civil case against her.



Luke Mitchell and mother at Jodi Jones' graveside following the funeral earlier that day.

Jodi's mother had earlier asked the Mitchell's to stay away from the funeral. The floral tribute left by the Mitchell's was later that day lifted by Jodi's mother and returned to the Mitchell doorstep as a sign of her utter contempt for the family.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2011, 07:39:PM by John »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
as far as i know there is no libel case agianst her and i havent heard that theres likely to be one.

if she was lying why all charges of lying agianst droped.

was it becouse the polce knew she was telling the truth.

John

  • Guest
as far as i know there is no libel case agianst her and i havent heard that theres likely to be one.

if she was lying why all charges of lying agianst droped.

was it becouse the polce knew she was telling the truth.

Lets refresh your memory then.

Murderer Mitchell's mother sued for £¼m over deadly caravan

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
thats isnt libel is it.

its got nothing to do with weather her son is incocent or guilty.


John

  • Guest
thats isnt libel is it.

its got nothing to do with weather her son is incocent or guilty.

No its a civil case for damages.

Wonderful how your spelling always improves Missy???   ;D ;D ;D
« Last Edit: April 16, 2011, 07:40:PM by John »

John

  • Guest
I notice the sanctimonious back slapping continues unabated on WAP as the Mitchell camp attempt to rally from yet another defeat.

Keep up the good work chappies and especially the fake persona's parachuted in by scammer Middleton to swell the ranks of the believers.  It would be funny if it wasn't so sad!!   ;D ;D

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Ive put a Little bit about the case on my own forum.

http://mycrimesforum.myfastforum.org/forum4.php

John

  • Guest
Now the cross forum promotion begins.  You never change Middleton do you??   ;D ;D

Personally I believe that anyone who promotes their own forum on here should be banned.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2011, 11:42:AM by John »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
well i sugest you stop doing it yourself then.

now in your above posts you were calling me missy.

now calling me billy.

for christ make up your mind what sex i am

John

  • Guest
You noticed that then missy...... ;)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
you seem to discuss anything but the facts  of this case witch makes me wonder why you started the thread.

John

  • Guest
It seems the Mitchell case is going from bad to worse to a no hoper.  I believe the SCCRC have intimated that they will not be taking any points forward.

So much for Sandra Lean's input.   ;)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
and how would you know what the sccrc are doing.

John

  • Guest
and how would you know what the sccrc are doing.

It's right though isn't it missy?   ;D