Legally it should never have been admitted.
The other couple saw him in roughly the same circumstances as AB did. In a car travelling and through the rear view mirror, incidently both described different clothes , hair ect. wonder which one was right?
You are partially wrong on this point gordo30. Both driver and passenger saw him through the front windscreen as they approached him and the driver got a second glance in the rear view mirror after they passed him.
they described him as having near shoulder length hair, a dark green bomber jacket with orange lining, a black t-shirt with white writing on it just as mitchell wore that afternoon.
in court they described seeing him standing by an old wooden gate just yards from the end of the footpath where jodi had her throat cut just minutes earlier.