The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[susan]

Chelsea  I bet your Mum looked cool Dorothy Perkins caters for the fashion of today.  I myself love Laura Ashley and French Connection my nearest Laura Ashley is 200 miles away

[maggie]

Chelsea  I bet your Mum looked cool Dorothy Perkins caters for the fashion of today.  I myself love Laura Ashley and French Connection my nearest Laura Ashley is 200 miles away

Tough luck susie, serves you right...fancy sayng I have bingo wings.

[guest154]

Not to be rude but... Can we get back on topic, please? There was some good debate in here about the actual topic (the murder of a young girl) and I don't think the conversation being had at the moment should be being had in this topic.

 

[Chelsea]

Susan believe me she looked far from cool. She has Laura Ashley. Her Wallis stuff is nice though.

[susan]

Sorry Mat we girls just getting silly will behave now.

[maggie]

Please, keep on posting Sandra. Between the bullshit meant to distract the members from the actual deabte - I am reading.

Mat, I am curious, last time Dr Sandra Lean was on line you were quite up front with her and if I may say so a tad aggressive.  Today you are sweetness and light. Just wondered why the change?

[guest154]

I'm interested in what she has to say, Maggie. I don't believe much of it. But still she should be allowed to post,

[Neil]

I've never really been able to understand why it matters if someone is lying about their identity.  You just have to judge each post on it's own merits.  I'm convinced that Mat is Mat and John is John.  Would it matter if they were the same person? 

[Chelsea]

Yes, it would matter. We all know what John Lambertons about

[guest154]

I've never really been able to understand why it matters if someone is lying about their identity.  You just have to judge each post on it's own merits.  I'm convinced that Mat is Mat and John is John.  Would it matter if they were the same person?

Thanks, Neil.

It would matter to me. I'm tired of having to prove to people who I am. Was hounded by Keira, so proved to her. Was hounded by Jackie, so proved to her, then by Stephanie Hall so I proved to John so he was able to confirm it on his forum.

Anyone who wants to think differently, well more fool them.

[maggie]

Thanks, Neil.

It would matter to me. I'm tired of having to prove to people who I am. Was hounded by Keira, so proved to her. Was hounded by Jackie, so proved to her, then by Stephanie Hall so I proved to John so he was able to confirm it on his forum.

Anyone who wants to think differently, well more fool them.

I have to object,I'm really sorry but one of these days mat just for once maybe you can admit that at least half the fault was with you. I cannot understand your holier than thou attitude.

[guest154]

Maggie - go away. Your agenda is obvious. It's not my fault if people don't believe who I say I am. You can object all you want.

If people want to say that I'm not who I say I am, then let them - they are free to do as they wish. But each and every one of them is WRONG.

[Neil]

I've said this before but I will say it again!  Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that people with an opposing view, post on here, it makes things a lot more interesting.  What I don't understand however is, what motivates someone to post and proclaim someone's guilt, when that someone has already been convicted?  It's fighting for a cause that has already been won.

[maggie]

Maggie - go away. Your agenda is obvious. It's not my fault if people don't believe who I say I am. You can object all you want.

If people want to say that I'm not who I say I am, then let them - they are free to do as they wish. But each and every one of them is WRONG.

I don't have an agenda except to stand up for my friends when they are being bullied. 

[sandra L]

I'm interested in what she has to say, Maggie. I don't believe much of it. But still she should be allowed to post,

I have an idea, Mat. Why don't you post what you do believe, and why, and then we can compare that against the various other bits and pieces, and see where it leads us?

I can't post transcripts, reports, statements, etc - that's an offence in Scotland, although I can quote bits from some of the documents. Unfortunately, I know that means you have to accept my word that that is actually what the documents say, but there's no real way around that.

However, Luke's site on WAP has been live for three years, as has the forum thread, and I haven't been taken to task by any authority regarding the information I have posted - given the hostility towards any challenges to the judicial system in Scotland, it would be surprising, if I'd said anything which was not accuate, if they didn't come down on me like a ton of bricks.

Also, I'd be risking everything I've worked for for more than 9 years, if I was found to be being dishonest about what's in the papers - why would I take such a stupid risk? I realise that you may not wish to discuss the case on that basis, and I fully understand if that's the case - unlike our friends south of the border, we supporters in Scotland are hog tied when it comes to providing data for online campaigns.