Author Topic: garden crops  (Read 3260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: garden crops
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2014, 05:20:PM »
I agree - in those days it would be very handy to add to the "character assassination"

an to that charge i don't think hes got any claim of innocence.

so i am rather surprised that wasn't biged up.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: garden crops
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2014, 05:22:PM »
 Doesn't make him a murderer though.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: garden crops
« Reply #17 on: June 17, 2014, 05:24:PM »
no but i thought they would charged him with it while they were looking for evidence to charge him with murder handy bit of character assassination.

rather funny they never thought of that.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: garden crops
« Reply #18 on: June 17, 2014, 05:31:PM »
no but i thought they would charged him with it while they were looking for evidence to charge him with murder handy bit of character assassination.

rather funny they never thought of that.

Prior bad acts must at least be indictments if not convictions in order to be used unless there were some direct relation to the crime.  For instance if it were documented that the fight witesses between Jeremy and Nevill had to do with Nevill growing drugs then the drug issue could come in through the witness to the fight testifying about such.  But in reality the witness didn't know what the fight was over so no issue was raised at all for said fight.

You can't just say look he grew drugs so he is a bad seed and likely guilty of murder.  Bad acts have to be used for nuanced purposes and brought in, in nuanced ways like the potential example I gave. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: garden crops
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2014, 05:35:PM »
they dident need them to be admissable in court they just had to get it in the papers.


if a jurer has had read of it in a newspaper then the damage is done.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2014, 05:36:PM by nugnug »

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: garden crops
« Reply #20 on: June 17, 2014, 05:46:PM »
Wasn´t it opium and not cannabis?

Yes

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: garden crops
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2014, 05:51:PM »
so that would be even more damaging.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: garden crops
« Reply #22 on: June 17, 2014, 05:53:PM »
Also used in the manufacturing of heroin.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: garden crops
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2014, 05:58:PM »
I am not sure from reading a bit further whether it was specifically JB that was being watched? was it not to do with the theft of the crops in general ? So did they suspect it was an inside job or outside job and WHF was just being watched in general ?

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: garden crops
« Reply #24 on: June 17, 2014, 06:04:PM »
They used to have those dried opium plants at florists here - they were for flower decorations. Youngsters would buy them and boil the "heads" into "tea", which gave a mild opium effect. They are prohibited now - the authorities found out about this.
Can´t help wondering if Sheila and Jeremy would have done the same with the crops readily available to them at the farm?!

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: garden crops
« Reply #25 on: June 17, 2014, 06:17:PM »
I am not sure from reading a bit further whether it was specifically JB that was being watched? was it not to do with the theft of the crops in general ? So did they suspect it was an inside job or outside job and WHF was just being watched in general ?

Are you talking about the Caravan burglary when you say job?

There is no evidence Jeremy was being watched by police of any kind until after the murders when they came to suspect him. 

Some people are claiming without any evidence to back up their claims that police definitely would have been watching him prior to the murders because of neighbors complained that he was growing drugs.  I doubt  aneighbor;s complain would result in his phone being tapped and him being followed aorund and there is no evidence that such occurred.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline wilf

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: garden crops
« Reply #26 on: June 17, 2014, 06:47:PM »
a small ammount for own use, back garden style, seems small fry to get special branch involved. and phone taps are home office controled so not given out without good reason. if crop theft related to drugs us was the problem how come MAFF wernt involved it was their licence?
all seems a bit cloak and dagger to me. this is an awful tradgedy without  getting theories of organised crime into the mix

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: garden crops
« Reply #27 on: June 17, 2014, 06:49:PM »
a small ammount for own use, back garden style, seems small fry to get special branch involved. and phone taps are home office controled so not given out without good reason. if crop theft related to drugs us was the problem how come MAFF wernt involved it was their licence?
all seems a bit cloak and dagger to me. this is an awful tradgedy without  getting theories of organised crime into the mix

I have to agree with you here. A few cannabis plants in a back yard would be a matter for the local police, nothing more.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: garden crops
« Reply #28 on: June 17, 2014, 06:58:PM »
 Maybe it was the opium poppies that were the attraction. They were worth money if grown for the pharmas in the manufacture of medicines,etc.
There were a few notorious drug gangs around at that time too.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: garden crops
« Reply #29 on: June 17, 2014, 07:00:PM »
What canabis was there at WHF and who was moving it? WHF was licenced to grow drugs for medical use but was this canabis? the licence would surely have had provision for possible criminal exploitstion? there are lots of other madical drugs grown  digitalis for example.  am I missing something?
 there was a field full of canabis grown near one of my walks it had NO street value as it had NO mind altering effect. it was for its fiber use in a type of spray plastering in the building industry. mind you stopped you in your tracks to see acres of it
Yes it was cannabis. But I'm not prepared to divulge my source, because they told me in confidence.