Author Topic: why the police might of moved the body.  (Read 3775 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #30 on: June 15, 2014, 10:19:PM »
Did you see the 2002 court transcript ?

There is no suggestion that the police pulled Sheila's legs. So who did ?

I don´t know. Sheila´s body was moved around - I can´t say it was Jeremy who did it. Could have been the EP. They wouldn´t be eager to admit to it, would they?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #31 on: June 15, 2014, 10:20:PM »
At 03.48 the three occupants – Sergeant Bews and PCs Myall and Saxby – reached Pages Lane, the private road leading to White House Farm. A few minutes later, Bamber arrived at the scene. The three officers were parked a short distance into the lane; Bamber pulled up behind them and left his silver Astra to speak with them. After identifying himself, he was asked to clarify what his father had managed to tell him before being abruptly cut off. The young man reiterated that Nevill, sounding very distressed, had asked him to come over at once because his sister Sheila had gone crazy and got hold of a gun. 

Does not seem like 60. Are you including the raid team ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #32 on: June 15, 2014, 10:24:PM »
To be fair an additional patrol car from Chelmsford arrived at the scene later.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #33 on: June 15, 2014, 10:27:PM »
I don´t know. Sheila´s body was moved around - I can´t say it was Jeremy who did it. Could have been the EP. They wouldn´t be eager to admit to it, would they?

Why an earth would the police pull Sheila's legs before the crime scene photographer arrived ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #34 on: June 15, 2014, 10:32:PM »
how do we know it would of happend before he arrived.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #35 on: June 16, 2014, 01:45:AM »
how do we know it would of happend before he arrived.

You need to be more precise in who you are suggesting did what. We can't tell what you are tlaking about with just pronouns. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #36 on: June 16, 2014, 08:38:AM »
Why an earth would the police pull Sheila's legs before the crime scene photographer arrived ?
CPR

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #37 on: June 16, 2014, 10:13:AM »
CPR




I'll go along with that,Grahame.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #38 on: June 16, 2014, 10:26:AM »



I'll go along with that,Grahame.
Whatever anyone says, that is the sign that someone has attempted CPR on Sheila. Another sign of course is the blood running out of the mouth. If there is pooled blood in the mouth and you apply CPR then that is what would happen. What happened after that? She was put on her side in the recovery position by someone who was trying to stop the blood going into her airway. That is why there is a lot of blood on her left side. If she was found on her back then you wouldn't get the blood pooling on her left side and under her armpit. These are classic signs of someone applying CPR and then turning her on her left side.
I conctantly wonder why more people have not noticed this? But of course we do know don't we? Because of all the police statements which say that the position in which she was photographed was the polition in which she was found.
It doesn't matter about the questions of how and why. It is just observing the body as it is.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #39 on: June 16, 2014, 10:53:AM »
Whatever anyone says, that is the sign that someone has attempted CPR on Sheila. Another sign of course is the blood running out of the mouth. If there is pooled blood in the mouth and you apply CPR then that is what would happen. What happened after that? She was put on her side in the recovery position by someone who was trying to stop the blood going into her airway. That is why there is a lot of blood on her left side. If she was found on her back then you wouldn't get the blood pooling on her left side and under her armpit. These are classic signs of someone applying CPR and then turning her on her left side.
I conctantly wonder why more people have not noticed this? But of course we do know don't we? Because of all the police statements which say that the position in which she was photographed was the polition in which she was found.
It doesn't matter about the questions of how and why. It is just observing the body as it is.






Grahame,,I wouldn't mind betting that what was heard on tape,was Sheila spluttering,,especially if she was on her back. That alone would prompt them to go in.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #40 on: June 16, 2014, 11:43:AM »
You need to be more precise in who you are suggesting did what. We can't tell what you are tlaking about with just pronouns.

its impossble to be precise as it could of happend at any time before it was photographed.

remember the title of this thread is might not did.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2014, 11:56:AM by nugnug »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #41 on: June 16, 2014, 11:57:AM »
Why an earth would the police pull Sheila's legs before the crime scene photographer arrived ?





EP have been pulling our legs for long enough now !

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #42 on: June 16, 2014, 12:27:PM »
there simple answer to that so he could get her legs in the photograph.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #43 on: June 16, 2014, 12:38:PM »
I did not see it. Would be good to see the source.

Thought most of the officers were outside, comforting a sobbing Jeremy.

The way people speak, it is as if  there were hundreds of officers outside WHF. There was only a handful.

Adam you have seen the source before .


Question 1- if you were on the jury and you had seen a photo where it looks like the scene of how the victim was holding the gun looked staged and it was indicated this was because it was in fact muder and not suicide - would it affect your judgment on the case?

Question 2 - if later on the police admitted they had moved the hand in order to take photos and that was not the exact original positon of the gun and hand as found on entry - would that affect your opinion ?

A simple yes or no will do.

This is only to point out how small details can be so vital. Nothing more.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: why the police might of moved the body.
« Reply #44 on: June 16, 2014, 01:10:PM »
well the jury be under the impression they were looking actually photo not a staged one.

so if the body was moved it would mean the jury had been misled.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2014, 01:11:PM by nugnug »