The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting

[mike tesko]

Unsigned versions of witness statements, usually are produced from hand written versions signed by the witness in question. Unsigned witness statements, which are often referred to as 'COMPOSITE STATMENTS', can only legally be made by the witnesses themselves, otherwise they have been illegally produced, since the citation at the beginning of these statements clearly states, and specifies that the witness statement has made of the witnesses own free will, but in reality this does not happen, since sometimes witnesses refuse to sign such statements...

[mike tesko]

Signrd witness statements, udually mean thay the contents of such eitness statements are the original version of the contents...

[grahameb]

1) Some of the statements Harters pointed to were signed so his claim those particular statements had not been signed was a lie.

2) there is no documents he could point to from COLP that stated what he claimed regarding anyone telling COLP they refused to sign because the statements were lies.

This is not new.  Mike has a history of on one hand claimimg documents are secret so he can't produce a copy yet claims on the other hand to know for a fact they exist and what they state.  You do the math.   

Mike has graduated to the club of, I have to check outside myself to see if the sky is blue because he might lie so that I get caught out in the rain without an umbrella...

I must have missed these statements? I can't seem to find them? Could you point them to me please? Thanks.

[scipio_usmc]

I must have missed these statements? I can't seem to find them? Could you point them to me please? Thanks.

Look at reply 738 for starters where Harters posted 2 statements.  Mike is intentionally lying on this point just like others.  Given the number of lies I have seen from Mike just in the past 2 weeks I fail to see how you or anyone who posts on this site can consider anything he says to be worthy of consideration.   

[Jane]

Look at reply 738 for starters where Harters posted 2 statements.  Mike is intentionally lying on this point just like others.  Given the number of lies I have seen from Mike just in the past 2 weeks I fail to see how you or anyone who posts on this site can consider anything he says to be worthy of consideration.

Curious to know why you think it's down to you to spell it out. I feel perfectly certain that we can form our own opinions and. work things out for ourselves

[scipio_usmc]

Curious to know why you think it's down to you to spell it out. I feel perfectly certain that we can form our own opinions and. work things out for ourselves

1) Graham asked

2) your opinions are based on lies, and ignorance (some of it intentional)

I realize you don't like having it exposed that your opinions are baseless but too bad.  A forum is for debating and when you form opinions based on bogus information then it is free to expose to prove you are wrong.

You try to do so to those who argue against you but can't do so competently while we cna prove it against you and that eats you up.

[guest154]

Curious to know why you think it's down to you to spell it out. I feel perfectly certain that we can form our own opinions and. work things out for ourselves

Grahame asked him where they were - so he told him. 


Thanks for posting them Hartley.

[Jane]

1) Graham asked

2) your opinions are based on lies, and ignorance (some of it intentional)

I realize you don't like having it exposed that your opinions are baseless but too bad.  A forum is for debating and when you form opinions based on bogus information then it is free to expose to prove you are wrong.

You try to do so to those who argue against you but can't do so competently while we cna prove it against you and that eats you up.

A psychologist too!!!!!!! My God, is there NO end to the skills you think you have?

[mike tesko]

No signed statements bearing dates and different contents which I posted have been produced by anyone, where the fuck are they?

DORK and TURNIP and their supporters are nothing but devious liars...

[Jane]

Grahame asked him where they were - so he told him. 


Thanks for posting them Hartley.

Thanks for that Mat.

[mike tesko]

Police killed Sheila, if a silencer was used, they would have known about it, long before relatives found the one they found...

[scipio_usmc]

A psychologist too!!!!!!! My God, is there NO end to the skills you think you have?

One need not be a psychologist to see how it eats you up anytime you have it stressed how baseless your opinions truly are.

It is plainly obvious when you make posts like the above attacking me for answering Graham. 

 

[mike tesko]

Blood could not have got into the silencer by process of backspatter because only blood and nothing else was discovered in it. Where is the fleshy tissue and bone fragments that should also be present in the silencer, but none is...

This suggests that the silencer was tampered with deliberately...

You simply cannot just have blood drawn back into a silencer minus fleshy tissue and bone fragmentation,  this proves there was no backspatter linked to the presence of the blood in the silencer...

[Jane]

One need not be a psychologist to see how it eats you up anytime you have it stressed how baseless your opinions truly are.

It is plainly obvious when you make posts like the above attacking me for answering Graham.

Please forgive me for being human, but I'd failed to see that Grahame was asking the question of you. I mistakenly thought he'd asked it of Harters and you'd responded in a way which sounded to me as if you were attacking Grahame.

[grahameb]

Mike: These people refused to sign statements.

Hartley: Hey everyone,  look at these signed statements.

Oh dear. 

But Hartley those statements mention only the bare bones of statements and contain nothing of what Mike has mentioned. No one is going to prosecute anybody with statement like that.
 Also how do you explain the "unsigned" statements that Mike posted up? Did any of those you listed testify in court?