Author Topic: The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting  (Read 49797 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Why would all these firearms officers, refuse to sign the contents of witness statements prepared for them by another, also refuse to attend the trial to testify under oath as per the contents of the witness statements prepared on their behalf by another, who simply "were not present at the scene" that morning?

PC Collins
PC Delgado
PC Rozga
PC Webb
PS Adams
PC Hall
APS Manners
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 08:48:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
For some reason the image that comes to my mind for Mike is Benny Hill.
Well one does question the reason why those statements are not signed?

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Benny Hill was hot.  8)

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Wasn't Benny Hill, funny?
Don't take any notice of them Mike. The are just acting like two silly little boys in a playground.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Benny Hill was hot.  8)

In the Italian Job he was the dork.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Mike, maybe I have overlooked something, but where does it say this:

"I refuse to attend court and give this evidence because I will be prosecuted for perjury, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"...
Maybe Mike will enlighten us? But note that none of the statements of the firearms officers are signed Alias.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Maybe Mike will enlighten us? But note that none of the statements of the firearms officers are signed Alias.

We only see part of the first page of the statements. It says they are from 3 to 6 pages long.

No-Bits

  • Guest
We only see part of the first page of the statements. It says they are from 3 to 6 pages long.

They are just composite statements for circulation during the trial, there are of course signed original statements.

Feel free to check with NGB.

No-Bits

  • Guest
We only see part of the first page of the statements. It says they are from 3 to 6 pages long.

The statements are all located in the archives under Raid Team Statements.


jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/board,11.0.html



Note that these are typed copies, so a statement may indicate that it is 5 pages long, but that refers to the original hand written statement, the typed statement may only be 3 or 4 pages long.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 10:03:PM by Harters »

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
They are just composite statements for circulation during the trial, there are of course signed original statements.

Feel free to check with NGB.
Source please? ;D Oops sorry Adam's habit is catching. But it would of course be helpful if we saw a signed statement by each of them.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
The statements are all located in the archives under Raid Team Statements.


jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/board,11.0.html



Note that these are typed copies, so a statement may indicate that it is 5 pages long, but that refers to the original hand written statement, the typed statement may only be 3 or 4 pages long.
Thank you Hartley. Did any of them testify in court?

No-Bits

  • Guest
Thank you Hartley. Did any of them testify in court?

I expect it was sufficient for only one or two raid team members to give evidence in court, it certainly wouldn't have been necessary for them all to attend.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 10:21:PM by Harters »

No-Bits

  • Guest
Source please? ;D Oops sorry Adam's habit is catching. But it would of course be helpful if we saw a signed statement by each of them.

Mike doesn't have the signed statements, which is why they are not on the forum.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Mike doesn't have the signed statements, which is why they are not on the forum.
Well you did an excellent job in collating all those statements in the archive. I just thought you may have access to more info? Another thing I must ask ngb.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Source please? ;D Oops sorry Adam's habit is catching. But it would of course be helpful if we saw a signed statement by each of them.

You should be demanding a source from Mike.  He alleged the COLP investigation revealed the officers refused to sign because they asserted they didn't want to face perjury charges.

Of course he made that up just like the claim that DRH/50-53 were originally classified DRH 1-4.

His claims are all at this point simply laughable. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry