Author Topic: The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting  (Read 49792 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Somebody peering in through the kitchen window before police got into the farmhouse, does not entitle anyone to describe one of the bodies as a murder, and the other body as a suicide, by 7.45am...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Who in their right mind could describe Ralph Bambers death in the kitchen as a suicide?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Sorry mate but I think my interpretation is more logical than your interpretation. The documents are quite plain. I do not feel the necessity to lie either. I can't think that you feel the need to emphasise that I am?

I posted facts and then some different ways people to try to spin them.

What do you disagree with and what are you claiming so far as your interpretation that is so logical and correct?
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The claim that one of the officers peered into the kitchen window and reported that he could see a dead female behind the door, does not equate with that mistake being rectified once police got into the farmhouse, followed by the discover of a female body as well as the male body, and that one of the deaths was a murder, whilst the other was a suicide...

It just simply does not stack up, what police and their supporters are saying is codswallop, utter bullshit, Ralphs body could not be described as a female body after police find his body, and his death could not have been a suicide in a month of sundays...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
The claim that one of the officers peered into the kitchen window and reported that he could see a dead female behind the door, does not equate with that mistake being rectified once police got into the farmhouse, followed by the discover of a female body as well as the male body, and that one of the deaths was a murder, whilst the other was a suicide...

It just simply does not stack up, what police and their supporters are saying is codswallop, utter bullshit, Ralphs body could not be described as a female body after police find his body, and his death could not have been a suicide in a month of sundays...

The people who entered the kitchen all say the same thing as does the person who saw the body befor enetering- tha tth eonly body was the one stopped ove rthe chair which Collins though t was a female but ende dup being  aman.

None of those who entered the kitchen say there were 2 bodies. It was people who were not inside who assumed there were 2 bodies after hearing there was a man inside. 

You have no leg to stand on.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
At the conclusion of every firearms operation there is always a debriefing, and a report on what happened during the operation. These reports are a collection of notes provided by each member of the firearms officer attending and taking part in such an operation. The contents of these reports have never yet been disclosed, but instead witness statements were introduced, dated, later on, giving a false account about what police found upon entering the farmhouse...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
At the conclusion of every firearms operation there is always a debriefing, and a report on what happened during the operation. These reports are a collection of notes provided by each member of the firearms officer attending and taking part in such an operation. The contents of these reports have never yet been disclosed, but instead witness statements were introduced, dated, later on, giving a false account about what police found upon entering the farmhouse...

The contents of witness statements were prepared by the Operations Manager (OM), or by someone else acting under his authority, providing details of what senior officers wanted the individual firearms officers to say in these dodgy witness statements. Many of the firearms officers whose statements were prepared for them by someone else not in their presence, refused to attend the trial and testify, because the contents of their witness statements were untrue, inaccurate, and illegal, this group of firearms officers refused point blank to tell lies about where the bodies had been found. I can supply a full list of all such firearms officers, whose witness statements were falsified in keeping with the tactics that were adopted in the Hillsborough conspiracy:-

PC COLLINS Refused to sign the witness statement prepared for him by someone who did not attend the scene on the day of the incident at whf, 7th August 1985...

"I refuse to attend court and give this evidence because I will be prosecuted for perjury, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"...
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 07:26:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Next Officer who refused to sign the witness statement made on his behalf by the Operations manager (OM) or someone designated to prepare it:-

PC DELGADO

"I refuse to attend court and give this evidence because I will be prosecuted for perjury, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"...

« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 07:43:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

No-Bits

  • Guest
The contents of witness statements were prepared by the Operations Manager (OM), or by someone else acting under his authority, providing details of what senior officers wanted the individual firearms officers to say in these dodgy witness statements. Many of the firearms officers whose statements were prepared for them by someone else not in their presence, refused to attend the trial and testify, because the contents of their witness statements were untrue, inaccurate, and illegal, this group of firearms officers refused point blank to tell lies about where the bodies had been found. I can supply a full list of all such firearms officers, whose witness statements were falsified in keeping with the tactics that were adopted in the Hillsborough conspiracy:-

PC COLLINS Refused to sign the witness statement prepared for him by someone who did not attend the scene on the day of the incident at whf, 7th August 1985...

"I refuse to attend court and give this evidence because I will be prosecuted for perjury, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"...

I'd be surprised if a single person of any consequence actually believed you.  ::)

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I'd be surprised if a single person of any consequence actually believed you.  ::)

Please allow me to finish, before you make any comments like the ones you are making. When I have finished please feel welcome to contact all those I am naming to see if what I am saying is true - good luck with trying to make all these police officers tell lies that senior officers wanted them to tell...

GOODLUCK...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
And the next firearms officer, who refused to sign the contents of the false witness statement prepared for him by an unknown another:-

PC ROZGA

"I refuse to attend court and give this evidence because I will be prosecuted for perjury, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"...
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 08:20:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
I'd be surprised if a single person of any consequence actually believed you.  ::)

I can name several shils who will but won't names names because I get warnings.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I'd be surprised if a single person of any consequence actually believed you.  ::)

You'd better hope there is not another "Hillsborough type" investigation...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

No-Bits

  • Guest
You'd better hope there is not another "Hillsborough type" investigation...

I just think that you're a bit sick, but hey, you already know that.  ::)

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
I just think that you're a bit sick, but hey, you already know that.  ::)

For some reason the image that comes to my mind for Mike is Benny Hill.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry