The last ultimate test of gun, to prove sound moderator was not used in shooting

[mike tesko]

DS Jones took possession of one of the silencers (SBJ/1) from the scene on 7th August 1985, this silencer was in police possession when Jones and Jones went to speak to Jeremy at his cottage on 9th August 1985 - When interviewed by COLP in 1991, DS Jones confirmed in his answers to COLP questioning that DCI Taff Jones spoke to Jeremy about the silencer when they went along to see him on afternoon of 9th August 1985. Police therefore not only knew about the silencer from 7th August 1985, but they had possession of one of them, the one bearing the identifying mark of SBJ/1...

The relatives did not find the SBJ/1 silencer on 10th August 1985, because that (SBJ/1) silencer was already in police possession by that stage, and had been from the first morning of the investigation (7th August 1985)...

Silencer found by relatives was SJ/1...

Silencers SBJ/1 and SJ/1 are not the same silencers...

[mike tesko]

Unfortunately not, the accuracy of his post common knowledge.  As you well know Mr T!!!!!

Read this, and then tell me that police did not know about the existence of a silencer until relatives handed one of them (SJ/1) over to DS Jones on evening of 12th August 1985:-

Notes taken by COLP of interview of DS Jones

[No-Bits]

Oh dear, you're scraping the barrel a bit here Mr T!!!! 10 out of 10 for the effort though. 

[mike tesko]

On 9th August 1985, DCI Jones questioned Jeremy Bamber about the silencer:-

[mike tesko]

So, on 9th August 1985, not only do police know about one of the silencers, they already have possession of one (SBJ/1), and what is more, the police let Jeremy know that they know about the existence of the silencer before  they hand the keys to the farmhouse back to the family, later that same evening...

So, if Jeremy was the killer, why did Jeremy allow the police to give the keys to the farmhouse over to the relatives, who despised Jeremy?

[No-Bits]

Why are the dates 1986?

[No-Bits]

Why are the dates 1986?

Epic fail Mr T 

[No-Bits]

Total skullduggery in fact, shame on you. 

[scipio_usmc]

Total skullduggery in fact, shame on you. 

The worst part is that when one constantly does such it will make people doubt actual evidence of wrongdoing if such ever were found. 

I wondered why people kept saying Jeremy wants the site closed but I now think I get it.

[mike tesko]

Total skullduggery in fact, shame on you. 

Shame on you too, because did relatives re enact the events with the police as described prior to the trial (October 1986)?

[No-Bits]

The worst part is that when one constantly does such it will make people doubt actual evidence of wrongdoing if such ever were found. 

I wondered why people kept saying Jeremy wants the site closed but I now think I get it.

The sad thing is that people are oblivious to it, or even fall for it. 

[mike tesko]

Relatives conspired with police in 1985 / 1986 to introduce false silencer, blood and paint evidence, as confirmed by the posts provided, Silencer SBJ/1 was in police possession from 7th August 1985, and the chief conspirator who is now dead, falsified his pocketbook entries to hide what police and relatives got up too:-

One of the key conspirators was the relatives best friend, non other than the despicable crook known as DS Stan Jones, who quite literally cooked his pocketbook because he had been so deeply involved in helping relatives to frame Jeremy with the dodgy silencer, blood and paint evidence, there was insufficient room in two opr more pocketbooks issued to him to record it all down in - so he made false entries in several different pocketbooks...

[mike tesko]

DS Stan Jones was a criminal - he lied about silencers SBJ/1 and SJ/1...

[mike tesko]

Why are the dates 1986?

There was a review in 1986 of the investigation, the notes of which COLP investigators took possession of as part of their 1991 / 1992 investigation, so your point is?

[mike tesko]

What stands to reason is that SBJ/1 taken on 7 August was also a photo and that these phtoos were given a different prefix on the official forms because someone else actually took them not Jones.

SbJ/1 was the moderator found by Bouthflour, SBJ/2 the scope found by Boutflour, the box the moderator was in was SBJ/3.  All of these items transitioned to DB 1-3 and then DRB 1-3. 

 

You need to buck your ideas up mate, your losing the plot...

If you can read English, try and decipher the following:-