The suggestion that there was only ever just one silencer, with all these different exhibit refences of SBJ/1, SJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1, is outrageous, preposterous and dishonest, and the morons who think this is the true explanation need thier heads seeing to.
If you want to get into namecalling that is exactly how people see you, dishonest and with a screw loose.
There is not one shred of evidence of a second moderator. Your claim that there was a moderator marked SJ/1 is likewise not supported by any evidence whatsoever, makes no sense at all from the standpoint of the SJ prefix being used and seems to be something made up because minute by minute you change when this designation was assiged and to which moderator it was assigned.
You said SJ/1 was assigned to a moderator collected by Stanley Jones on August 7, 1985 even though he left WHF before evidence was collected and spent the day at Goldhanger interviewing people. You further insisted that in September police had SJ/1 in their possession while SBJ/1 was in the lab.
Next you contradicted yourself claiming the police found nothing on SJ/1 and gave it to the extended family. I pointed out that since you alleged SJ/1 came from WHF they would have no basis to give it to the extended family it could only be returned to Jeremy. I also pointed out that this contradicted your claim police had it while the other was in the lab.
You promptly changed to claiming SJ/1 was the moderator collected from Boutflour and asserted SBJ/1 was a suppressor collected by police directly from WHF. You also came up with a new claim that the family gave the silencer back to police so that your original claim coudl seem true.
The way you keep changing claims demonstrates you are just making things up. This is corroborated by your inability to provide any satisfactory explanation for your claims and more significantly inability to produce any evidence to substantiate them.
You have zilch to establish how Stanley Jones would have been in a position to collect any evidence on 8/7/85. Zilch to establish tha the actually did collect anything. Zilch to establish the SJ/1 prefix was used at all in the case. Zilch as far as a reason SJ/1 would have been used.
On the flip side police have provided documentary and testimonial evidence to explain how items collected by Stanley Jones from the relatives were labeled with the SBJ prefix such as the moderator SBJ/1, the scope SBJ/2 and box SBJ/3. There is documentary and testimonial evidence establhsing the SBJ prefix for these items was changed to DB upon learning they were found by Boutflour and changed again to DRB because prefix DB was already being used by the photographer. This not only makes perfect sense it is supported by the documents.
Your claims make no sense, are not supported at all and keep changing with the wind.
These morons have no sense of logic, they have no explanation for why DSJones took possession of one of the two key silencers (SBJ/1) from the scene on 7th August 1985, three full days before the relatives found the other key silencer at the farmhouse.
You have produced no evidence at all that he did. You keep ignoring that he was tasked with interviewing people not collecting physical evidence on the day in question. Much like you invented the SJ/1 designation out of thin air so too have you apparently made up a moderator being collected on 8/7/85.
They have no answer to account for how the same silencer could have been kept in two different places by different people, since the relatives silencer (SJ/1) remained in Ron Cooks personal possession for a total of 17 days, carried about in his pockets all the while between 13th and 30th August 1985, whilst the other key silencer (SBJ/1) was being used as a paper weight on DCI 'Taff' Jones desk at Witham police station until 30th August 1985, at which stage PC Whiddon took possession of it and arranged for it to be sent to the lab' that same date (30th August) inside which the critical loose flake was eventually found on 11th September 1985...
There is no evidence at all it was in 2 different places at different times. The claim it was being used as a paper weight on Taff Jones desk for a month is not supported by any credible evidence. Nor do you have any credible evidence it was in possession of police in a different location when when it was tested at the lab. Cook brought it to the blab and was there as lab personnel tested it, it remained in his charge even as they tested it which is how it was in police custody at the same time it was at the blab. He was there at the lab with it. That doesn't make it in 2 different places it just means it was not relinquished from police custody to control of the lab.
Whilst the loose flake was being found in silencer DB/1 at the lab' on 11th September, Ann Eaton still had possession of the other key silencer (SJ/1) in her possession at home and it only got recollected from her later on, on 11th September 1985. Even then, the silencer given to police by Ann Eaton on 11th September was retained by Essex police, fingerprinted by DS Davidson and DS Eastwood on 13th September 1985, and not sent to the lab' by police to be checked for blood and fibers until 20th September 1985, so how could police still have the silencer until 29th September and it already being at the lab' from as long ago as 30th August, inside which the critical loose flake had already been found and analysed whilst police still had possession of the silencer the blood was supposedly found inside it elsewhere...
Why send a silencer to the lab' on 20th September 1985, to be checked for blood, if blood had already been found inside it, and the silencer had been checked for blood...
These claims about Eaton handing over a moderator in Spetember 1985 are likewise fairytale inventions from you without any support whatsoever that make no sense at all.
It is anyone who believes the tales you are peddling that have problems and need their head checked.
